Table 1.
| ||||||
Aldehyde | Ligand Ia (trans-trans) |
Ligand Ib (cis-trans) |
Ligand Ic (cis-cis) |
|||
R | Conva [%] | eeb [%] | Conva [%] | eeb [%] | Conva [%] | eeb [%] |
| ||||||
Ph | 99 | 60 (R) | 99 | 38 (R) | 99 | 94 (S) |
4-NO2C6H4 | 99 | 29 (R) | 99 | 8 (R) | 99 | 91 (S) |
2-CH3OC6H4 | 99 | 80 (R) | 99 | rac | 99 | 94 (S) |
4-ClC6H4 | 99 | 52 (R) | 99 | 7 (R) | 99 | 95 (S) |
2-thienyl | 94 | 66 (R) | 99 | 20 (R) | 86 | 95 (S) |
naphth-2-yl | 96 | 69 (R) | 94 | 25 (R) | 94 | 93 (S) |
PhCH2CH2 | 98 | 73 (R) | 91 | 38 (R) | 95 | 89 (S) |
t-Bu | 35 | 80 (R) | 30 | 41 (R) | 32 | 96 (S) |
iPr | 98 | 83 (R) | 94 | 43 (R) | 99 | 91 (S) |
aThe conversion was determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude product. bThe enantiomeric excess was determined by chiral HPLC.