Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 31;67(2):455–476. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00280

Table 7.

Results of linear mixed-effects regressions examining direction of effects on peak frequency.

Model of peak frequency Hypothesis Est SE df t p
Overbite + 0.0014 0.0026 280.5 0.5275 .5983
SN-GoGn −0.0012 0.0014 217.6 −0.8590 .3913
FMA −0.0006 0.0014 217.7 −0.4073 .6842
Overjet (Class I) N/A −0.0204 0.0119 65.4 −1.7184 .0905
Overjet (Class II) + 0.0055 0.0064 60.1 0.8628 .3917
Overjet (Class III) −0.0004 0.0040 149.4 −0.0951 .9243
ANB (Class II) −0.0006 0.0065 58.1 −0.0923 .9268
ANB (Class III) + 0.0006 0.0034 148.1 0.1756 .8609
Wits (Class II) 0.0012 0.0042 58.1 0.2849 .7767
Wits (Class III) + 0.0017 0.0029 148.3 0.5889 .5569
U1-SN N/A 0.0003 0.0010 214.9 0.2954 .7680
IMPA N/A −0.0010 0.0011 216.9 −0.8855 .3769

Note. Est = estimate; SE = standard error; df = degrees of freedom; SN-GoGn = Sella-Nasion-Gonion-Gnathion; FMA = Frankfort-mandibular plane angle; N/A = not applicable; ANB = A-point-Nasion-B-point; Wits = Wits appraisal; U1-SN = Upper-1 (central incisor) to Sella-Nasion Angle; IMPA = mandibular incisor to mandibular plane angle.