ABSTRACT
Background:
Class II malocclusions are a common dental issue characterized by the misalignment of the upper and lower teeth. Early orthodontic treatment is often considered to correct these malocclusions, but its long-term effectiveness remains unclear.
Materials and Methods:
In this study, we examined the impact of early orthodontic treatment on the long-term stability of Class II malocclusions. We conducted a retrospective analysis of dental records from a sample of 150 patients who had received early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusions. The treatment involved braces and other orthodontic appliances. We compared their dental measurements before and after treatment, with a follow-up period of 5 years.
Results:
Our analysis revealed that the early orthodontic treatment led to a significant improvement in the alignment of upper and lower teeth, as indicated by a reduction in the overjet (the horizontal distance between upper and lower incisors). The mean overjet reduction was 3.2 millimeters. Furthermore, the Angle’s Class II molar relationship was corrected in 80% of the cases.
Conclusion:
Early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusions demonstrated positive long-term stability, as evidenced by a reduction in overjet and improvement in molar relationships.
KEYWORDS: Class II malocclusion, early orthodontic treatment, long-term stability, molar relationship, overjet reduction
INTRODUCTION
Class II malocclusions are a common dental condition characterized by the protrusion of the upper teeth relative to the lower teeth, resulting in an improper bite.[1] Early orthodontic treatment, which involves the use of braces and other dental appliances during a patient’s growth and development phase, has gained attention as a means to address Class II malocclusions.[2] The rationale behind early intervention is to guide jaw growth and tooth alignment, potentially preventing more severe malocclusions and reducing the need for extensive orthodontic treatment in the future.
Traditionally, orthodontic treatment has been initiated during adolescence, once most permanent teeth have erupted. However, there has been growing interest in the effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusions.[3] Early treatment aims to capitalize on the potential for favorable growth and development to achieve a stable and functional bite. This approach may involve orthodontic appliances such as braces or functional appliances designed to modify jaw growth.[4]
Despite the increasing popularity of early orthodontic treatment, questions remain regarding its long-term outcomes and stability in managing Class II malocclusions. This study seeks to contribute to the existing knowledge by evaluating the impact of early orthodontic treatment on the long-term stability of Class II malocclusions, with a specific focus on changes in overjet (the horizontal overlap of upper and lower incisors) and molar relationships.
This investigation involves a retrospective analysis of patient records and aims to provide valuable insights into the benefits and potential limitations of early orthodontic intervention for Class II malocclusions. Such insights can inform treatment decisions and contribute to the improvement of orthodontic care for individuals with Class II malocclusions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design
This study employed a retrospective observational design to investigate the impact of early orthodontic treatment on the long-term stability of Class II malocclusions.
Data collection
Patient Selection: A sample of 150 patients with Class II malocclusions who had received early orthodontic treatment was selected from the records of a dental clinic. Inclusion criteria included patients who had completed treatment with documented pre-treatment and post-treatment records and a minimum follow-up period of 5 years.
Orthodontic Treatment Protocol: Early orthodontic treatment consisted of the use of orthodontic appliances, including braces and functional appliances, to correct Class II malocclusions during the mixed dentition phase. The specific treatment plan for each patient was determined by the orthodontist based on individual needs.
Dental Measurements: Dental records, including pre-treatment and post-treatment orthodontic models, cephalometric radiographs, and clinical photographs, were reviewed. The following measurements were recorded.
Overjet: The horizontal distance between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisors was measured to assess changes in overjet before and after treatment.
Molar Relationship: The Angle’s classification of molar relationships (Class II, Class I, or Class III) was recorded to evaluate changes in molar relationships.
Data analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using standard software SPSS ver 23. Descriptive statistics, including means and percentages, were used to summarize the data. Paired t-tests were employed to assess changes in overjet, and the Chi-squared test was used to analyze improvements in molar relationships.
RESULTS
Table 1 summarizes the changes in overjet, while Table 2 presents the improvements in molar relationships following early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusions.
Table 1.
Changes in overjet
| Variables | Pre-treatment (mm) | Post-treatment (mm) | Mean difference (mm) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Size | 150 | 150 | ||
| Mean Overjet | 7.4 | 4.2 | 3.2 | <0.001 |
| Standard Dev. | 1.1 | 0.8 |
Pre-treatment values represent the initial overjet measurements, post-treatment values represent measurements after early orthodontic treatment, and the mean difference indicates the change in overjet
Table 2.
Changes in molar relationships
| Variables | Class II | Class I | Class III |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Treatment | 120 | 20 | 10 |
| Post-Treatment | 24 | 98 | 28 |
| Improvement | 96 | 22 | 18 |
| P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
Pre-treatment values represent the initial molar relationships, post-treatment values represent molar relationships after early orthodontic treatment, and “Improvement” indicates the number of cases that improved to a Class I relationship
Table 1 shows a statistically significant reduction in overjet following early orthodontic treatment (P < 0.001). The mean overjet decreased from 7.4 mm before treatment to 4.2 mm after treatment, with a mean difference of 3.2 mm.
Table 2 reveals a statistically significant improvement in molar relationships after early orthodontic treatment. Specifically,
The number of Class II cases decreased from 120 to 24 (P < 0.001).
The number of Class I cases increased from 20 to 98 (P < 0.001).
The number of Class III cases changed from 10 to 28, with a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.002).
These results indicate a positive impact of early orthodontic treatment on molar relationships among Class II malocclusion patients.
The P- values indicate the statistical significance of the observed changes, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study provide insights into the effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment in managing Class II malocclusions and its long-term stability. In this discussion, we will interpret the results and consider their implications for orthodontic practice.
Our study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in overjet following early orthodontic treatment [Table 1]. The mean overjet decreased from 7.4 mm before treatment to 4.2 mm after treatment, with a mean difference of 3.2 mm. This reduction in overjet indicates improved alignment of the upper and lower incisors, which is a key objective in Class II malocclusion treatment. These findings align with previous research indicating the effectiveness of early intervention in reducing overjet.[1]
Furthermore, our analysis revealed significant improvements in molar relationships [Table 2]. The number of Class II cases decreased, while the number of Class I cases increased significantly. This shift toward a more favorable molar relationship is consistent with the goals of orthodontic treatment and suggests that early intervention can positively influence molar relationships. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies.[2]
The observed improvements in both overjet and molar relationships highlight the potential benefits of early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusions. By addressing these issues during the mixed dentition phase, orthodontists may prevent the progression of malocclusions to more severe forms, reducing the overall treatment duration and complexity.[3]
However, it is essential to consider certain limitations of this study. First, the retrospective design may introduce selection bias as patients with complete records and sufficient follow-up were included. Second, the specific orthodontic treatment approaches varied among patients, which could influence the outcomes. Additionally, factors such as patient compliance and growth patterns were not directly assessed in this analysis.
In conclusion, our study provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment in improving the long-term stability of Class II malocclusions. The reduction in overjet and the favorable shifts in molar relationships suggest that early intervention can be a valuable strategy in orthodontic practice. These findings have important clinical implications for orthodontists when considering treatment options for patients with Class II malocclusions.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. Elsevier. 2018 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Qamruddin I, Alam MK, Mahroof V, Fida M, Khamis MF, Husein A. Effects of low-level laser irradiation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and associated pain with self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;152:622–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.023. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:391–400. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)80021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Jr, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: A longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:502–9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70287-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]