Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 9;16(3):e55852. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55852

Table 4. Table with prevalence for articles employing the Polguj method.

ND, no data available

Author Type IA (%) Type IB (%) Type IC (%) Type II (%) Type IIIA (%) Type IIIB (%) Type IIIC (%) Type IV (%) Type V (%)
Polguj et al. (2011) [4] 15.10 3.50 5.80 2.30 8.20 2.30 44.20 7.00 11.60
Ahmed (2018) [14] 15.38 24.61 ND 1.54 21.53 26.15 ND 3.08 7.69
Polguj et al. (2013) [28] 14.12 3.08 6.98 1.95 2.92 0.97 52.27 4.72 12.99
Vyas et al. (2012) [32] 6.00 5.00 9.33 2.67 2.33 2.67 37.67 3.67 30.67