Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 8;11(2):024009. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024009

Table 2.

Segmentation performance comparison (DSC) of fine segmentation models.

Model Prostate Rectum SV Femoral heads
UNet 0.866 ± 0.034 0.846 ± 0.036 0.687 ± 0.141 0.942 ± 0.017
UNet + E 0.867 ± 0.042 0.847 ± 0.041 0.737 ± 0.103 0.942 ± 0.017
UNet + E + ASE 0.861 ± 0.039 0.847 ± 0.055* 0.751 ± 0.081 0.939 ± 0.015
Residual UNet 0.861 ± 0.044 0.854 ± 0.045 0.736 ± 0.100 0.941 ± 0.017
Residual UNet + E 0.854 ± 0.059 0.844 ± 0.046 0.711 ± 0.121 0.941 ± 0.016
Residual UNet + E + ASE 0.861 ± 0.052 0.842 ± 0.053 0.744 ± 0.098 0.939 ± 0.016
Dense UNet 0.860 ± 0.040 0.839 ± 0.061 0.726 ± 0.128 0.941 ± 0.017
Dense UNet + E 0.863 ± 0.054 0.850 ± 0.041 0.673 ± 0.146 0.942 ± 0.017 *
Dense UNet + E + ASE 0.864 ± 0.040 0.858 ± 0.040 * 0.710 ± 0.139 0.941 ± 0.016
*

denotes statistically significant improvement over same model without enhancement or self-ensembling (p<0.05 using Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction). SV: seminal vesicles. Bold indicates the best performance for each organ.