Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 8;11(2):024009. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024009

Table 4.

Segmentation performance of the full two-step segmentation pipeline and other state-of-the-art segmentation methods.

Model Metric Prostate Bladder Rectum SV Femoral heads Average
nnUNetv2 DSC 0.826 ± 0.075 0.935 ± 0.091 0.832 ± 0.045 0.722 ± 0.108 0.926 ± 0.019 0.848 ± 0.067
HD95 6.327 ± 5.070 25.103 ± 67.73 10.332 ± 8.152 4.953 ± 1.871 4.804 ± 2.197 10.304 ± 17.003
nnFormer DSC 0.830 ± 0.073 0.930 ± 0.100 0.838 ± 0.047 * 0.720 ± 0.094 0.923 ± 0.022 0.848 ± 0.067
HD95 6.001 ± 4.151 24.911 ± 67.24 9.289 ± 7.881 4.771 ± 1.351 5.237 ± 2.778 10.042 ± 16.681
Swin UNETR DSC 0.831 ± 0.067 0.920 ± 0.175 0.828 ± 0.049 0.727 ± 0.106 0.924 ± 0.033 0.846 ± 0.086
HD95 5.829 ± 3.115 11.554 ± 46.12 8.561 ± 6.060 5.550 ± 6.155 5.040 ± 4.418 7.307 ± 13.173
Two-Step Pipeline DSC 0.836 ± 0.071 0.947 ± 0.038 * 0.828 ± 0.057 0.724 ± 0.101 0.933 ± 0.020 0.854 ± 0.057
HD95 5.454 ± 2.790 3.931 ± 4.864 * 8.840 ± 6.760 4.444 ± 1.385 3.947 ± 2.064 * 5.323 ± 3.573

SV: seminal vesicles. Bold indicates the best performance for each organ.

*

denotes statistically significant improvement over the second best performing method (p<0.05 using Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction).