Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 22;9(5):415–427. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00034-7

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcomes

Treatment effect (difference between groups; 95% CI) p value
Top-down vs accelerated step-up treatment effect
Primary outcome measure
Sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission 64 percentage points (57 to 72) <0·0001
Secondary outcome measure
Endoscopic remission 23 percentage points (11 to 36) <0·0001
Quality of life (IBD-Q) numerical score 8·54 (3·51 to 13·60) <0·0001
Number of flares −1·29 (−1·42 to −1·16) <0·0001
Number of steroid courses −0·87 (−0·97 to −0·76) <0·0001
Number of hospital admissions and surgeries −0·12 (−0·23 to −0·02) 0·023
Biomarker–treatment interaction effect
Primary outcome measure
Sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission 1 percentage point (−15 to 15) 0·944
Secondary outcome measure
Endoscopic remission 2 percentage points (−24 to 25) 0·902
Quality of life (IBD-Q) numerical score 1·42 (−8·76 to 11·60) 0·784
Number of flares 0·06 (−0·33 to 0·20) 0·640
Number of steroid courses 0·05 (−0·16 to 0·26) 0·638
Number of hospital admissions and surgeries −0·11 (−0·32 to 0·11) 0·332

Sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission and endoscopic remission data are presented as absolute differences (absolute difference in percentage points). Quality of life data are presented as absolute differences using the IBD-Q numerical score. Number of flares, steroid courses, hospital admissions and surgeries are presented as difference in number of events per patient per year.