Table 4.
Reader 1 without CI | Reader 1 with CI | Reader 2 without CI | Reader 2 with CI | Reader 3 without CI | Reader 3 with CI | |
Radiographs of sacroiliac joints | ||||||
Precision | 76.2% | 76.2% | 63.4% | 64.4% | 63.4% | 77.2% |
Sensitivity | 63.6% | 56.4% | 54.6% | 50.9% | 38.2% | 61.8% |
Specificity | 91.3% | 100% | 73.9% | 80.4% | 93.5% | 95.7% |
ppV | 89.7% | 100% | 71.4% | 75.7% | 87.5% | 94.4% |
npV | 67.7% | 65.7% | 57.6% | 57.8% | 55.84% | 67.7% |
Radiologists’ confidence M (SD) | 5.3 (1.9) | 5.9 (2.2) | 4.6 (1.9) | 4.8 (2.1) | 5.9 (3.3) | 7.2 (2.4) |
Radiographs and MRI of sacroiliac joints | ||||||
Precision | 79.8% | 81.8% | 76.8% | 77.8% | 82.8% | 83.8% |
Sensitivity | 72.4% | 72.4% | 79.3% | 74.1% | 72.4% | 72.4% |
Specificity | 90.2% | 95.1% | 73.2% | 82.9% | 97.6% | 100% |
ppV | 91.3% | 95.5% | 80.7% | 86.0% | 97.7% | 100% |
npV | 69.8% | 71.4% | 71.4% | 70.9% | 69.4% | 71.9% |
Radiologists’ confidence M (SD) | 6.5 (1.5) | 6.0 (2.1) | 7.4 (2.9) | 6.9 (2.1) | 5.9 (2.1) | 8.8 (2.4) |
.M, mean; npv, positive negative value; ppV, positive predictive Value.