Skip to main content
Public Health in Practice logoLink to Public Health in Practice
. 2024 Apr 4;7:100492. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100492

Herbal medicines use among HIV/AIDS patients on antiretroviral therapy and its influence on viral suppression and CD4 count: A survey at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania

Karol J Marwa a,⁎, Josephine Kadodo b, Shabani Iddi c, Anthony Kapesa d
PMCID: PMC11002646  PMID: 38595639

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the magnitude of concurrent use of herbal medicines with ART, its associated factors and effect on viral load suppression and CD4 count among people living with HIV.

Study design

This was a cross-sectional study involving 375 HIV positive patients on ART attending at care and treatment clinic (CTC).

Methods

Data were obtained through face-to-face interviews using pre-structured questionnaires and patient's files through a checklist. Adherence was assessed though pill count method while CD4 count and viral load suppression were assessed using the Tanzania National guidelines for the management of HIV and AIDS. Data were analysed using STATA version 15. Independent predictors for herbal medicine use or viral suppression were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Out of 375 PLHIV, 37 (35%) reported to use herbal medicines concurrently with ART. Predictors for herbal medicines use were existence of chronic disease (OR = 4.53; CI = 1.87–10.95) (p = 0.001), male gender (OR = 0.57; CI = 0.35–0.93) (p = 0.02) and HIV clinical stage (OR = 1.71; CI = 0.99–2.94) (p = 005). PLHIV who used herbal medicines along with ART did not have a significantly higher chance of achieving viral suppression than PLHIV who did not use herbal medicines (OR = 1.42; CI = 0.71–2.82). There was no statistically significant difference on CD4 count (p = 0.8943) and viral load (p = 0.8612) between herbal medicines users and non-users.

Conclusion

The utilization of herbal medicine among PLHIV on ART remains notably prevalent. Nonetheless, it is worth noting that despite the prevailing herbal medicine usage, there is no substantial effect on viral suppression. The primary determinants of the adoption of herbal medicines use were having chronic medical conditions and the stage of progression of the HIV infection.

Keywords: Herbal medicines, HIV, Treatment outcomes and Tanzania

1. Background

Herbal medicine is defined as herbs, herbal materials, herbal preparations and finished herbal products that contain active ingredients, part of plants, other plant materials or combination thereof [1]. More than 80% of population in developing countries particularily in Africa and Asia use herbal medicine for various conditions/diseases [2] whereby the pooled prevalence estimates of herbal medicines use among people living with HIV (PLWH) is high up to 90% [3,4]. Studies in developing countries suggest that belief in traditional medicine among PLWH is very strong to the extent that some individuals would quit antiretroviral therapy (ART) for herbal medicine [[5], [6], [7]].

The major issue regarding the use of herbal medicines in HIV patients on ART is the potential for herbal-drug interactions whereby herbal drugs may alter the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) thus influencing the efficacy and safety of these drugs [8]. The mechanisms of herbal-drug interactions involves the possibility of herbal drugs to induce or inhibit drug metabolizing enzymes (CYP450 isoforms) and transporters (P-glycoproteins). Clinically significant herbal drug interactions among HIV/AIDS patients on ART have been reported in some African countries [8,9]. Worse enough, studies have indicated that, majority of HIV/AIDS patients using herbal medicines and ARVs concomitantly do not disclose this information to their health care providres when they attend routine clinic visits [[10], [11], [12]] thus may act as a confounder during the assessment of clinical and immunological outcomes during clinic visits.

A part from HIV/AIDS patients who use herbal medicines concurrently with ART being at a risk of experiencing treatment failure or toxicity, herbal-drug interactions may also be a source for sub-therapeutic drugs levels exposure to the virus thus posing a risk for resistance considering high level of mutations conferring resistance to first-line ART that have been recently reported in Tanzania and other countries [13,14] thus jeorpodazing the United Nations HIV/AIDS 95-95-95 global target by 2035 which aims at ensuring 95% of individuals on ART achieve significant viral suppression (<1000 copies/ml) and complete eradication of HIV epidemic is attained [15].

In Tanzania, more than half of the population use traditional medicines particularly herbal medicines for management of various diseases/conditions including HIV symptoms [16]. The country is estimated to have over 12,000 plant species and approximately 10% of these are used for medicinal purposes [17]. The influence of herbal medicines use among HIV patients taking ART on clinical outcomes is uncharacterized phenomenon globally as well as Tanzania. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of herbal medicines utilization and to assess its associated factors and potential impact on markers of immunological response and early clinical failure in individuals living with HIV/AIDS who are undergoing ART.

2. Methods

2.1. Study area and design

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) Care and Treatment Clinic (CTC). BMC is a consultant and teaching referral hospital for the Lake and Western zones of the United Republic of Tanzania serving Mwanza, Mara, Geita, Kagera, Kigoma, Simiyu Tabora and Shinyanga regions. The CTC department was started in 2004 and serves about 14,000 clients [18].

2.2. Study participants and sampling procedure

This study included HIV positive patients on ART at the CTC unit of BMC. We enrolled participants who returned to the clinic for ARV refills and medical evaluation based on clinical symptoms and immunological progress. An assumed prevalence of herbal medicines use of 50% was used since prevalence of herbal medicines use among PLHIV is unknown in the study area to obtain 384 participants using the Kish Leslie (1965) formula. A systematic sampling method was employed where by numbers were assigned on the daily patient register from 1 to 10; then all 1st, 3rd and 5th numbers were picked randomly. Patients who were represented by these numbers were included in the study up to when the sample size was reached. The picked participants were interviewed on the same date of their visit to the clinic. Data for nine particpants was not included in the analysis due to incompleteness of the information.

2.3. Data collection

Data were collected using a pre-tested structured (Swahili translated) questionnaire which was administered through face to face interviews after obtaining written consent from respondents. The questionnaire captured the information on the socio-demographic characteristics, magnitude of herbal use and predictors for herbal use practice.

Data comprising clinical diagnoses, ART initiation, adherence to ART, CD4 count and viral load were obtained from patient's files using a pre-tested checklist which was adopted from similar studies in other areas. Then, files were extracted by the data clerks while data was extracted by the principal investigator after file reviews. The questionnaire and checklist instruments can be found in additional file 1.

2.4. Assessment of adherence to ART

Data on adherence to ART was obtained from CTC records whereby pill count method was employed. Patients were required to provide all ART pills that were dispensed during the last clinic visit and the remaining pills from the prior visit. The formulas below were used in calculating adherence.

% of pills missed = (No. of pills remaining / Total No. of pills prescribed) x 100 %

adherence = 100 - % of pills missed.

Adherence <95% to ART was considered as poor adherence while adherence >95% to ART was considered as optimal adherence according to the Tanzania National guidelines for the management of HIV and AIDS.

2.5. Assessment of CD4 count and virological load suppression

In Tanzania, HIV viral load testing is usually done at six months after initiation of ART. Plasma HIV viral load ≥1000 copies/ml was regarded as virological failure while plasma HIV viral load < 1000 copies/ml was regarded as virological suppression. CD4 count ≤350 cells/mm3 was defined as immunological failure as per the Tanzania National guidelines for the management of HIV and AIDS.

2.6. Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using STATA version 15 (Statistical Corporation, College Station, TX, US). Data were checked for errors, missing data and inconsistencies before the analysis. Chi-square and Fischer's exact tests were performed for determining association between categorical variables where appropriate. Demographic and socio-economic variables were assessed using logistic regression. The potential associations were assessed at univariate and multivariate level (using the multivariate model). Stepwise backward logistic regression was used to determine whether these variables were independent predictors for herbal medication use or viral suppression; odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported as a measure of effect. Tests of significance were performed using the 0.05 level to infer significance.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the study participants

A total of 375 PLHIV with a mean age of 39 years [Standard Deviation (SD): 0.7] were included in this study. Of the total, 132 (35%) used herbal medicines concomitantly with ART where by females were the most herbal medicines users 96 (72.7%). There were statistically significant difference in herbal medicine use between males and females (p = 0.047) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of sudy participants.

Variable Characteristic Herbal medicine use
Chi 2 P-value
Yes n(%) No n(%)
Sex
Female 96 (72.7) 152 (62.6) 2.0414
0.047
Male
36 (27.3)
91 (37.4)
Age (Years)
Mean 39.2

0.302
Standard deviation
0.7
Marital status
Married 71 (53.8) 138 (56.8) 0.3125
0.576
Not married
61 (46.2)
105 (43.2)
Family size
1–5 67 (50.8) 135 (55.6) 14.7758
0.097
6–10
65 (49.2)
108 (44.4)
Residence
Urban 107 (81.1) 218 (89.7) 6.6586
0.036
Rural
25 (18.9)
25 (10.3)
Care stored drugs
Me 122 (92.4) 240 (98.8) 11.6268
0.020
Child 6 (4.5) 3 (1.2)
Relative 2 (1.5) 0 (0)
Mother 1 (0.8) 0 (0)
House girl
1 (0.8%)
0 (0)
Occupation
Business 82 (62.2) 174 (71.6) 6.1601
0.406
Student 14 (10.6) 19 (7.8)
Farming 12 (9.1) 14 (5.8%)
Unemployed 10 (7.6) 13 (5.3)
Fishing 6 (4.5) 15 (6.2)
Daily wage jobs 4 (3.0) 5 (2.1)
Employed
4 (3.0)
3 (1.2)
Assets owned
House 37 (28.0) 67 (27.6) 7.0604
0.423
Radio 78 (59.1) 153 (63.0)
Television 9 (6.8) 16 (6.6)
Car
0 (0)
1 (0.4)
Sponsor
Myself 106 (80.3) 212 (87.2) 4.6333
0.201
Father/mother 14 (10.6) 18 (7.4)
Insurance 3 (2.3) 6 (2.5)
Others
9 (6.8)
9 (3.7)
Level of education
Primary 100 (75.7) 194 (79.9) 4.6713
0.323
Secondary 22 (16.7) 37 (15.2)
Certificate/diploma 7 (5.3) 9 (3.7)
University 0 (0) 2 (0.8)
Others
3 (2.3)
1 (0.4)
Chronic medical condition Yes 16(12.2) 9(3.7) 9.7403 0.002
No 116(87.8) 238(96.3)

3.2. Factors associated with the use of herbal medicines

Having chronic medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, peptic ulcer disease and hypertension, was significantly associated with herbal medicines use (p = 0.002). Other factors associated with the use of herbal medicines concurrently with ART therapy were gender (p = 0.047), area of residence (p = 0.036) and person caring stored drugs (p = 0.020) as shown in Table 1.

Having a with a chronic medical condition was a strong predictor for herbal medicines use (OR = 4.53; CI = 1.87–10.95; p = 0.001). Herbal medicines use concurrently with ART was less likely in males compared to females (OR = 0.57; CI = 0.35–0.93; p = 0.02). Patients on clinical stage 2 & 3 (OR = 1.71; CI = 0.99–2.94; p = 005) had higher odds of using herbal medicines compared to those on clinical stage 1 (OR = 1.71; CI = 0.95–3.09; p = 0.07). Patients on second line ART and who have used ART for more than 5 years had higher odds of using herbal medicines (OR = 1.71; CI = 0.42–6.81 & OR = 1.31; CI = 0.79–2.18 respectively) but this observed trend was not statistically significant (Table 2).

Table 2.

Factors associated with herbal medicines use among PLHIV on ART.

Variable Category Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
cOR 95% CI P Value aOR 95% CI P Value
Clinical stage 1 Ref . . Ref . .
2 1.65 0.97–2.80 0.06 1.71 0.99–2.94 0.05
3 1.77 1.01–3.10 0.04 1.71 0.95–3.09 0.07
4 1.19 0.56–2.53 0.64 1.04 0.46–2.29 0.93
Regimen First line Ref . . Ref . .
Second line 1.48 0.39–5.63 0.56 1.71 0.42–6.81 0.45
Chronic disease No Ref . . Ref . .
Yes 3.58 1.53–8.36 0.003 4.53 1.87–10.95 0.001
Education Primary 1 . . 1 . .
Above primary 0.86 0.53–1.41 0.57 0.83 0.49–1.37 0.46
Sex Female Ref . . Ref . .
Male 0.63 0.40–1.01 0.057 0.57 0.35–0.93 0.02
Duration on ART 0–5 years Ref . . Ref . .
>5 years 1.44 0.89–2.32 0.13 1.31 0.79–2.18 0.28
Viral suppression Yes Ref Ref
No 1.23 0.64–2.36 0.52 1.41 0.71–2.78 0.328

3.3. Types, sources and reasons for use of herbal medicines among PLHIV

For the purpose of this study, herbal medicine was considerd as plant parts used for medicinal purposes. The use of plant parts for food purposes was excluded in this definition. The major herbal medicines used by PLHIV concurrently with ART were Allium sativum (24.2%), Zingiber officinale (22.7%), Moringa oleifera (17.4%) and Aloe vera (14.4%). The most reported source of these herbal medicines was herbal shops accounting for 56.7%. The main reason for using herbal medicines concurrently with ART was to achieve combined effect of the two (56%) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Herbal medicines used, sources, types of preparation used and reasons among PLHIV.

Herbal medicines used Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Allium sativum (Alliaceae) 32 24.2
Zingiber officinales (Zingiberaceae) 30 22.7
Moringa oleifera 23 17.5
Aloe vera (Aloaceae) 19 14.4
Others
28
21.2
Total
132
100
Source of herbal medicines
Herbal medicine shops 75 57.3
Others 44 33.6
Traditional healer
12
9.1
Total
131
100
Type of preparation
Mixed preparation 49 37.1
Leaves 42 31.8
Roots 33 25
Others
8
6.1
Total
132
100
Reason for using herbal medicines
Combining effects 76 57.6
ARV side effects 19 14.3
Conviced by fellow patient or HCWs 31 23.5
Others 6 4.6
Total 132 100

3.4. Change in viral load and CD4+ count among people using ART and herbal medicine

The findings of this study suggest lack of significant difference in the change of viral load and CD4+ count among PLHV on concurrent use of ART with herbal medicine compared those using ART alone (Table 4).

Table 4.

Viral load and CD4 count among PLHIV using herbal medicines compared to those not using herbal medicines.

SN Variable Herbal medicine use
95% Conf. Interval P-value
Yes
No
Mean Mean
1 CD4 starting (cells/mm3) 365.75 368.96 −49.00 to 55.42 0.54
2 CD4 during treatment (cells/mm3) 423.07 505.35 −47.91 to 212.49 0.89
3 Viral load starting (copies/ml) 8961.25 2734.47 −11013.48 to −1440.07 0.99
4 Viral during in midline time (copies/ml) 4165.89 1189.69 −5899.24 to −53.15 0.97
5 Current Viral load (copies/ml) 1533.42 651.90 −2475.5 to 712.45 0.86

3.5. Factors associated with viral suppression among PLHIV on ART

Patients on ART only had increased odds of archieveing viral suppression (OR = 1.42; CI = 0.71–2.82) compared to those who took ART and herbal medicines concurrently. Education level above primary education was a strong predictor of viral non-suppression in both models (OR = 0.47; CI = 0.23–0.92). Patients on advanced WHO HIV clinical stage (stage 4) had lower odds of archieving viral suppression than those on early stage of the disease (OR = 0.38; CI = 0.13–1.09) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Factors associated with viral suppression among PLHIV on ART.

Variable Category Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
cOR 95% CI P Value aOR 95% CI P Value
Clinical stage 1 Ref . . Ref .
2 0.69 0.31–1.56 0.37 0.71 0.31–1.62 0.41
3 0.72 0.30–1.72 0.46 0.71 0.28–1.76 0.46
4 0.46 0.17–1.24 0.12 0.38 0.13–1.09 0.07
Herbal medicines Yes Ref . . Ref .
No 1.23 0.64–2.36 1.42 0.71–2.82 0.31
Chronic disease Yes Ref Ref . .
No 0.31 0.04–2.31 0.25 0.24 0.03–1.93 0.18
Education Primary Ref Ref
Above primary 0.45 0.23–0.88 0.02 0.47 0.23–0.92 0.03
Sex Female Ref Ref
Male 0.66 0.35–1.28 0.22 0.65 0.33–1.28 0.21
Duration on ART 0–5 years Ref Ref
>5 years 1.45 0.75–2.82 0.26 1.40 0.68–2.81 0.35

4. Discussion

In this study, we identified the level of herbal medicines use and associted factors among PLHIV. The influence of herbal medicines use on CD4 improvement and viral load supression among these patients was also evaluated. Viral load measurement among PLHIV on ART every six months is essential in confirming viral replication and treatment failure (immunological and clinical) [19].

Herbal medicines use was high (35.2%) among PLHIV receiving ART at the CTC clinic in Tanzania. The documented prevalence of concurent herbal medicines and ART use among PLHIV receiving ART is similar to findings from urban areas in Ethiopia [11]. This similarity may be due to similarities in culture, lifestyle, beliefs and economic levels within these African populations. However, these findings are relatively low as compared studies done in Nigeria, Uganda and Kenya [[20], [21], [22]]. This discrespancy can be attributed to diferences in study populations where by most of participants in the present study were from urban area of Mwanza, City while in those previous studies, particpants were mainly from rural area. Studies have documented the use of herbal medicines to be higher in rural than urban populations [23,24].

The most commonly herbal medicines used concurrently with ART in our study population were Allium sativum, Zingiber officinales, Moringa oleifera and Aloe vera. These herbal medicines have been suggested to have various effects when taken concurrently with ARVs. Allium sativum has been suggested to lower plasma concentration of protease inhibitors such as saquinavir through its CYP450 enzymes inducing potential [25,26] while the suggested mechanism of suMoringa oleifera was inhibition of HIV replication [27] and inhibition of CYP450 enzymes mainly CYP3A4 [28] thus could influence plasma levels of ARV used in clinical practice.

The findings fromthis study suggest that having chronic medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, peptic ulcer disease and hypertension, is significantly associated with herbal medicines use among PLHIV on ART. This corresponds to a study in Thailand which reported high use of herbal medicines among patients with chronic diseases [23]. The present study has also reported higher odds of herbal medicines use concurrently with ART therapy in females. This could be explained by difference in health seeking behaviour between the genders in the population whereby more females tend to attend to health facility for consultation than males.

Moreover, our current study implies that patients with the advanced stage of the diseases have higher odds of using herbal medicines which may possibly be due to side effects of ART or an increase in opportunistic infections and lower odds of viral suppression compared to those in the early clinical stage. Patients on second line ART had higher odds of using herbal medicines than those on the first line although this observed trend was not statistically significant. Patients are normally switched to second line whenever there is failure in treatment or severe adverse effects, therefore patients may be tempted to look for an alternative treatment due to the treatment outcomes. Duration of ART use was a strong predictor for herbal medicine use although this observed trend was not statistically significant.

To rule out the influence of ART adherence on immunological and clinical outcomes, the ART adherence was evalauted. The present study reports a good adherence among patients who used ART and herbal medicines concurently and those who use ART alone regardedless of the disease stage. The lack of difference in adherence between the two groups indicates lack of influence of adherence in the reported results between herbal medicines users and non users.

Despite the high use of herbal medicines among PLHIV on ART, viral suppression remained significantly high among patients who used herbal medicines concurrently with ART and those who used ART only (Table 5) suggesting insignificant influence of herbal medicines use on viral load supression in the study area. This finding is encouraging taking into account herbal medicines use has been reported to result into poor viral supression among patient on ART in other areas in Africa.

The observation on similar viral suppression in herbal users and non users is supported by the mean CD4 count and mean viral load between the two groups. Whereby there was no statistically significant difference between PLHIV using on herbal medicines cocurrently with ART and those on ART only. However, it is worth to note that, although there was no statistically significant difference, an interesting trend was observed for the viral load. Patients using ART concurrently with herbal medicines had higher initial viral load and viral load after six months than their counterpart (Table 4) implying that herbal medicines could still have an effect on viral load suppression.

The lack of differences in the viral load supression and CD4 cell improvement between herbal medicines users and non users may also suggest lack of significant herbal medicines-ART interaction(s) in the study area. The use of herbal medicines is a function of belief, it could be that, these medicines have little or do not have any effect on immunological or clinical outcomes among PLHIV.

This study was limited by the fact that the proportion of virally suppresed PLHIV was obtained among those who had viral load records since not all participant files had viral load records thus the viral suprresion proportion may have been over estaimated or underestimated. Furthermore, there was a potential for recall bias since the herbal medicine details were obtained from face-to-face interviews. In Tanzania, HIV viral load testing is usually done at six months after initiation of ART therefore changes in VL and CD4 with time could not be established in the present study. Lastly, The dose of herbal medicines taken and the influence of individual genetics which could substantially modify ART effect on viral suppression were not etablished in this retrospective study.

5. Conclusion

The concurrent use of herbal medicines alongside ART is high among PLHIV attending CTC in the study area. However, immunological and clinical outcomes were not compromised by herbal medicines use among PLHIV on ART suggesting a lack of pharmacological effect or herbal medicines-ART interactions for the herbal medicines used in this setting.

Authors’ contributions

JK participated in proposal development, data collection and manuscript drafting. KJM played a key role in concept development, supervision of the data collection, data analysis and manuscript drafting. AK and SI contributed in concept development, data analysis and revising the manuscript for submission.

Funding

This work was technically supported by the Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences and Bugando Medical Centre. No grant was received.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical and study approval was granted by the joint Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences (CUHAS)/Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) Institutional Review Board. All patients or parent/guardian signed a written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Written consent was obtained from all study participants after clarification on the objectives of the study and their right to quit the study without compromising the clinical care provided to them.

Declaration of competing interest

All authors declare to have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank study participants,nurses,pharmacists and medical doctors at the CTC for their valuable cooperation and inputs during the study period.

Abbreviations

ACT

Artemisinin-based combination therapy

ART

antiretroviral therapy

ARVs

antiretroviral drugs

BMC

Bugando Medical Centre

CTC

care and treatment clinic

PLHIV

people living with HIV

WHO

World Health Organization

References

  • 1.Organization WH . World Health Organization; 2019. WHO Global Report on Traditional and Complementary Medicine 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tesfahuneygn G., Gebreegziabher G. Medicinal plants used in traditional medicine by Ethiopians: a review article. J Respir Med Lung Dis. 2019;4(1):1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu J.P., Manheimer E., Yang M. Herbal medicines for treating HIV infection and AIDS. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005;(3) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003937.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lorenc A., Robinson N. A review of the use of complementary and alternative medicine and HIV: issues for patient care. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2013;27(9):503–510. doi: 10.1089/apc.2013.0175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roura M., Busza J., Wringe A., Mbata D., Urassa M., Zaba B. Barriers to sustaining antiretroviral treatment in Kisesa, Tanzania: a follow-up study to understand attrition from the antiretroviral program. AIDS patient care and STDs. 2009;23(3):203–210. doi: 10.1089/apc.2008.0129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Musheke M., Bond V., Merten S. Individual and contextual factors influencing patient attrition from antiretroviral therapy care in an urban community of Lusaka, Zambia. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2012;15 doi: 10.7448/IAS.15.3.17366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Azia I.N., Mukumbang F.C., Van Wyk B. Barriers to adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a regional hospital in Vredenburg, Western Cape, South Africa. South. Afr. J. HIV Med. 2016;17(1):1–8. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fasinu P.S., Gurley B.J., Walker L.A. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic herb-drug interactions in antiretroviral therapy. Curr. Drug Metabol. 2015;17(1):52–64. doi: 10.2174/1389200216666151103115053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mills E., Foster B.C., van Heeswijk R., Phillips E., Wilson K., Leonard B., Kosuge K., Kanfer I. Impact of African herbal medicines on antiretroviral metabolism. Aids. 2005;19(1):95–97. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200501030-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shelley B.M., Sussman A.L., Williams R.L., Segal A.R., Crabtree B.F. ’They don't ask me so I don't tell them’: patient-clinician communication about traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine. Ann. Fam. Med. 2009;7(2):139–147. doi: 10.1370/afm.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shiferaw A., Baye A.M., Amogne W., Feyissa M. Herbal medicine use and determinant factors among HIV/AIDS patients on antiretroviral therapy in tikur anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. HIV/AIDS-Research and Palliative Care. 2020:941–949. doi: 10.2147/HIV.S283810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haile K.T., Ayele A.A., Mekuria A.B., Demeke C.A., Gebresillassie B.M., Erku D.A. Traditional herbal medicine use among people living with HIV/AIDS in Gondar, Ethiopia: do their health care providers know? Compl. Ther. Med. 2017;35:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sangeda R.Z., Gómes P., Rhee S.-Y., Mosha F., Camacho R.J., Van Wijngaerden E., Lyamuya E.F., Vandamme A.-M. Development of HIV drug resistance in a cohort of adults on first-line antiretroviral therapy in Tanzania during the stavudine era. Microbiol. Res. 2021;12(4):847–861. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mbhele N., Chimukangara B., Gordon M. HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitors: a review of current drugs, recent advances and drug resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2021;57(5) doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.HIV/AIDS JUNPo: Understanding Fast-Track: Accelerating Action to End the AIDS Epidemic by 2030. June 2015. Geneva, Switzerland) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stanifer J.W., Patel U.D., Karia F., Thielman N., Maro V., Shimbi D., Kilaweh H., Lazaro M., Matemu O., Omolo J. The determinants of traditional medicine use in northern Tanzania: a mixed-methods study. PLoS One. 2015;10(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mahunnah R., Uiso F., Kayombo E. vol. 8. Dar es Salaam University Press; Dar es Salaam–Tanzania: 2012. (Documentation of Traditioanal Medicine in Tanzania: A Traditioanal Medicine Resource Book). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gunda D.W., Kilonzo S.B., Mtaki T., Bernard D.M., Kalluvya S.E., Shao E.R. Magnitude and correlates of virological failure among adult HIV patients receiving PI based second line ART regimens in north western Tanzania; a case control study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019;19(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3852-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Organization WH: WHO . vol. 2021. WHO Geneve; Suisse: 2016. (Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Idung A.U., Abasiubong F. Complementary and alternative medicine use among HIV-infected patient's on anti-retroviral therapy in the Niger Delta Region, Nigeria. Clin. Med. Res. 2014;3(5):153–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lubinga S., Kintu A., Atuhaire J., Asiimwe S. Concomitant herbal medicine and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) use among HIV patients in Western Uganda: a cross-sectional analysis of magnitude and patterns of use, associated factors and impact on ART adherence. AIDS Care. 2012;24(11):1375–1383. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.648600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nagata J.M., Jew A.R., Kimeu J.M., Salmen C.R., Bukusi E.A., Cohen C.R. Medical pluralism on Mfangano Island: use of medicinal plants among persons living with HIV/AIDS in Suba District, Kenya. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011;135(2):501–509. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.03.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Peltzer K., Pengpid S. The use of herbal medicines among chronic disease patients in Thailand: a cross-sectional survey. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2019:573–582. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S212953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Henke O., Bruchhausen W., Massawe A. Use of herbal medicine is associated with late-stage presentation in Tanzanian patients with cancer: a survey to assess the utilization of and reasons for the use of herbal medicine. JCO Global Oncology. 2022;8 doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Borrelli F., Capasso R., Izzo A.A. Garlic (Allium sativum L.): adverse effects and drug interactions in humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007;51(11):1386–1397. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200700072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Piscitelli S.C., Burstein A.H., Welden N., Gallicano K.D., Falloon J. The effect of garlic supplements on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002;34(2):234–238. doi: 10.1086/324351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sangar V., Samant L., Pawar S., Vaidya S., Chowdhary A. In silico approach to combat HIV using phytoconstituents of Moringa oleifera Lam. J. Chem. Pharmaceut. Res. 2015;7:997–1021. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Monera T.G., Wolfe A.R., Maponga C.C., Benet L.Z., Guglielmo J. Moringa oleifera leaf extracts inhibit 6β-hydroxylation of testosterone by CYP3A4. Journal of infection in developing countries. 2008;2(5):379. doi: 10.3855/jidc.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health in Practice are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES