Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Behav. 2023 Dec 10;52:101840. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101840

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study participants (n = 114).

Mean (standard deviation)

Age (years) (n = 112) 47.0 (12.6)
BMI (kg/m2) (n = 113) 30.7 (6.5)

N (%)

Race/ethnicity
 White 91 (79.8 %)
 Black or African American 7 (6.1 %)
 Asian 4 (3.5 %)
 Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin 2 (1.8 %)
 Middle Eastern or North African 2 (1.8 %)
 American Indian or Alaska Native 0 (0.0 %)
 Multiple races/ethnicities or other 5 (4.4 %)
 Prefer not to answer 3 (2.6 %)
Gender identity
 Cisgender female 104 (91.2 %)
 Cisgender male 4 (3.5 %)
 Non-binary or genderqueer 1 (0.9 %)
 Prefer not to answer 5 (4.4 %)
Self-reported eating disorder history (n = 112) 17 (15.2 %)
High eating disorder risk 45 (39.5 %)
Weight cycling history 39 (34.2 %)
Frequent dieting 55 (48.2 %)
Larger body size (n = 113) 51 (45.1 %)
Higher subjective social status (n = 112) 62 (55.4 %)
Higher educational attainment 52 (45.6 %)

High eating disorder risk: Eating Disorder Examination-Question Short score ≥ 1.2).

Weight cycling history: loss of 10 lbs 6+ times.

Frequent dieting: “often” or “always” (versus “rarely” or “never”).

Larger body size: body mass index ≥30.

Higher subjective social status: 6–10 rating on the Mac MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status (versus 1–5).

Higher educational attainment: advanced degree (versus less than an advanced degree).