Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 25;15:1364658. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1364658

Table 4.

Proposed plasma Aβ42/40 ranges for clinical decision makinga.

Plasma Aβ42/40 range Designation ADRC, N (% of cohort) PET positivity, N (%) MCI, N (%) AD, N (%) ApoE4, N (%) Real world, N (% of cohort) Real world, projections of PET positivity, Nb Potential next evaluation and management considerations
<0.150 Positive (low ratio) 91 (36.4) 61 (67.0) 50 (54.9) 34 (37.4) 43 (47.3) 1,468 (23.7) 984 Follow up for AD workup (high risk)
0.150–0.159 Indeterminant (lower ratio) 37 (14.8) 31 (83.8)c 14 (37.8) 18 (48.7) 25 (67.6) 1,128 (18.2) 945 Follow up for AD workup (indeterminant risk)
0.160–0.169 Indeterminant (higher ratio) 38 (15.2) 7 (18.4) 19 (50.0) 2 (5.3) 7 (18.4) 1,080 (17.4) 199 Follow up for AD workup (low risk)
≥0.170 Negative (high ratio) 84 (33.6) 2 (2.4) 41 (48.8) 0 (0.0) 13 (15.5) 2,516 (40.6) 60 Follow up for non-AD etiology
All All 250 101 (40.4) 124 (49.6) 54 (21.6) 88 (35.2) 6,192 2,188

Aβ, beta-amyloid; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ApoE4, apolipoprotein E4 proteoform; MCI, mild cognitive impairment. aPercentage of individuals falling within a range unless otherwise specified. bReal world projections of positron emission tomography (PET) positivity are based on percent PET positivity in the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) cohort. cNo statistically significant difference was observed between the percentage of PET positivity in the <0.150 and 0.150–0.159 groups (p = 0.090 by 2-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction).