Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Nov 3;158:105450. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450

Table 1. Domains of Assumptions Shaping Scientific Frameworks and Resulting Theory.

This table summarizes domains of theoretical assumptions for scientific frameworks which shape the scientific theories resulting from them. As a case study, we highlight the framework of assumptions for Affect-as-Information Theory, to provide an exemplar in affective research. The first two rows correspond to domains of assumptions embedded in our individual contexts as affective researchers; the latter rows are the assumptions about affective phenomena themselves. Each unitalicized domain forms the basis of the italicized domain following it. Finally, the last row, indicated in bold, corresponds to the collective of all the domains of assumptions above it.

Domain of Assumptions (collectively, framework) Description Relationships between Domains of Assumptions Shorthand Exemplar in Affective Research Affect-as-Information Theory (Schwarz and Clore, 1983, 2003; Clore et al., 2001; Schwarz, 2012)
Pragmatics assumed context-dependent motivation for the study of theoretical constructs Shapes metaphysics and mechanism and, therefore, determines construct and operationalization. why a construct should be studied and why a certain operationalization should be used to study it Affect should be studied as information, by observing its effect on judgments, to situate subjective experience in decision-making.
Theoretical virtues assumed desiderata for what makes good framework and theory (e.g., parsimony, elegance, simplicity) shaped by aesthetic preferences; frames how theory that applies construct and operationalization is evaluated why an explanation of a phenomenon is good Characterizing affect as information provides parsimonious explanation for its influence on decision-making.
Metaphysics assumed nature of phenomenon shaped by pragmatics what the phenomenon is One set of studies testing affect-as-information theory examines mood as an influence on decision-making.
Construct assumed abstraction of phenomenon shaped by pragmatics, metaphysics, and (sometimes) operationalization; what construct is studied Mood is construed as ranging from positive to negative.
Mechanism assumed process of phenomenon guided by pragmatics and metaphysics how phenomenon arises In the mechanism of mood functioning as information, positive valence biases positive judgment and negative valence biases negative judgment.
Operationalization assumed measurement of abstracted phenomenon guided by pragmatics, construct, and mechanism how construct is observed Overall positive to negative mood was manipulated by prompting recall of happy or sad events.
Teleology assumed purpose of the phenomenon existing determined by pragmatics; motivates metaphysics and mechanism why phenomenon exists Affect-as-information theory suggests that mood functions as information in order to indicate benign or problematic environment.
Framework (or paradigm) a set of the above domains of assumptions; terms used to articulate and organize testable theories usually explicitly or implicitly consists of all of the above all of the above All of the above