Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 25;78(4):889–899. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad618

Table 3.

Characteristics of the Included Scores

Characteristics All Level
N = 242
n (%)e
Level 1d, N = 193
n (%)e
Level 2, N = 49
n (%)e
Category
 1 First/early contact with healthcare facility ➝ Fatal outcome 100 (41.3) 79 (40.9) 21 (42.9)
 2 First/early contact with healthcare facility ➝ Deterioration 112 (46.3) 94 (48.7) 18 (36.7)
 3 Severe disease or ICU admission ➝ Deterioration or fatal outcome 13 (5.4) 12 (6.2) 1 (2.0)
 4 First diagnosis and contact with outpatient healthcare facility ➝ Hospitalization 14 (5.8) 5 (2.6) 9 (18.4)
 5 Acute infection ➝ PCC 3 (1.2) 3 (1.6) 0 (0.0)
Study design
 Prospective 33 (13.6) 30 (15.5) 3 (6.1)
 Retro- and prospective 12 (5.0) 3 (1.6) 9 (18.4)
 Retrospective 182 (75.2) 150 (77.7) 32 (65.3)
 Unknown 15 (6.2) 10 (5.2) 5 (10.2)
Multicenter design
  ≥ 2 centers 103 (42.9) 54 (28.3) 49 (100.0)
Samples size
 Cumulative number of participants ≥1000 87 (36.0) 47 (24.4) 40 (81.6)
 Estimated events per variablea (median, IQR) 15.6 (IQR = [6.6, 267.3])
Health sector
 Hospitals/emergency department 216 (89.6) 182 (94.8) 34 (69.4)
 In- or outpatient sites 16 (6.6) 3 (1.6) 13 (26.5)
 Outpatient sites 7 (2.9) 5 (2.6) 2 (4.1)
 Other 2 (0.8) 2 (1.0) 0 (0.0)
Population
 Patients in the emergency department 25 (10.3) 18 (9.3) 7 (14.3)
 Inpatients with severe disease 37 (15.3) 35 (18.1) 2 (4.1)
 Inpatients without restriction to specific conditionsb 158 (65.3) 132 (68.4) 26 (53.1)
 Inhabitants of one region 1 (0.4) 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)
 Out- and inpatients 11 (4.5) 2 (1.0) 9 (18.4)
 Outpatients 10 (4.1) 5 (2.6) 5 (10.2)
Study/recruitment time
 2020 38 (77.6)
 2020–2021 4 (8.2)
 2020–2022 7 (14.3)
Country
 China 45 (18.6) 39 (20.2) 6 (12.2)
 Italy 25 (10.3) 24 (12.4) 1 (2.0)
 United States 33 (13.6) 18 (9.3) 15 (30.6)
 Other 139 (57.4) 112 (58.0) 27 (55.1)
Timing of predictor measurement
 Admission to hospital or emergency department 190 (79.8) 159 (84.1) 31 (63.3)
 Admission to ICU 7 (2.9) 6 (3.2) 1 (2.0)
 SARS-CoV2 testing/diagnosis 13 (5.5) 12 (6.3) 1 (2.0)
 Other 28 (11.8) 12 (6.3) 16 (32.7)
Outcomes
 Deterioration (composite, with fatal outcomes) 109 (45.0) 91 (47.2) 18 (36.7)
 Fatal outcomes (single endpoint) 116 (47.9) 94 (48.7) 22 (44.9)
 Hospitalization 14 (5.8) 5 (2.6) 9 (18.4)
 Post-acute COVID syndrome 3 (1.2) 3 (1.6) 0 (0.0)
Handling of missing values
 Any imputation method applied 19 (38.8)
 Multiple imputation 11 (22.4)
Modeling technique
 (Cox, (Bayesian) Logistic, LASSO) Regression 41 (83.7)
 Machine learning 2 (4.1)
 Mixed methods or other 6 (12.2)
Validationc
 Separate cohort present 138 (57.0) 89 (46.1) 49 (100)
 Geographical validation 10 (20.4)
 Temporal validation 17 (34.7)
 Temporal and geographical validation 7 (14.3)
 Random split 13 (26.5)
 Validation with different population characteristics 1 (2.0)
 Independent external validation 2 (4.1)
Discrimination
 AUC of the strongest validation ≥ 0.75 190 (78.5) 141 (73.1) 49 (100.0)
 AUC (median, IQR) 0.83 (IQR = [0.77, 0.90]) 0.84 (IQR = [0.77, 0.91]) 0.81 (IQR = [0.80, 0.85])
Calibrationc
 Any method applied 30 (61.2)
 Calibration plot or table 23 (46.9)
 Hosmer-Lemeshow 12 (24.5)
Application
 Formula 65 (26.9) 65 (33.7) 0 (0.0)
 Points-based and formula 172 (71.1) 123 (63.7) 49 (100.0)
 Formula 3 (1.2) 3 (1.6) 0 (0.0)
 Other 2 (0.8) 2 (1.0) 0 (0.0)

We present n (%) for categorical information and the median (IQR) for continuous information. The column “All” includes all scores fulfilling the a priori inclusion criteria. In contrast, Level 1 merely includes scores that did not fulfill the selection criteria and Level 2 only includes the scores fulfilling the criteria (see Methods section). As a result of two granularity levels of data extraction, some information is only available for Level 2 scores.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; COVID, coronavirus disease; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; PCC, post-COVID-19 condition; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

aEvents per variable (EPV) were estimated using the absolute number of candidate predictors. Some studies did not precisely name the number of candidate predictors. To generate assumptions regarding the sample size, we counted predictors indicated as candidates in tables or texts (signed by “∼” in Supplementary Table 2), even though we acknowledge that using the number of regression coefficients instead is more precise [15].

bRegarding population characteristics, “severe disease” includes ICU patients and patients with respiratory complications, pneumonia, intubation, or other severe conditions.

cMultiple options possible.

dLevel 1 (L1) includes those scores among “all” scores that did not fulfill the Level 2 selection criteria.

eOr median with IQR.