Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 20;44(3):585–593. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.03.21

表 2.

不同模态组合间的比较

Comparison between different modal combinations

Models Accuracy (%) Precision (%) Recall (%) F1-score (%)
OM(No Seg) model: The model trained on optical microscope data without segmenting glomerular regions. OM model: The model trained on optical microscope datawith segmenting glomerular regions. IM model: The model trained on immunofluorescence microscope data. TEM model: The model trained on transmission electron microscope data. OM&IM model: The fusion model trained on optical microscope and immunofluorescence microscope data. The naming convention for the other models was the same.
OM(No Seg) model 72.90±3.67 72.80±3.62 72.87±3.49 72.60±3.66
OM model 77.50±3.06 78.13±3.91 76.93±3.17 76.93±2.98
IM model 87.08±4.25 87.53±3.62 87.27±4.12 86.87±4.04
TEM model 38.08±3.78 36.73±3.61 38.20±3.44 35.60±3.71
OM&IM model 87.92±3.06 88.60±3.81 88.00±3.00 87.87±3.44
IM&TEM model 87.09±2.43 87.00±2.20 86.93±2.72 86.67±2.39
OM&TEM model 75.83±2.12 76.73±3.19 75.87±2.07 75.60±2.12
OM&IM&TEM model 88.34±2.12 88.73±2.40 88.27±2.23 88.13±2.08