表 2.
不同模态组合间的比较
Comparison between different modal combinations
| Models | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-score (%) |
| OM(No Seg) model: The model trained on optical microscope data without segmenting glomerular regions. OM model: The model trained on optical microscope datawith segmenting glomerular regions. IM model: The model trained on immunofluorescence microscope data. TEM model: The model trained on transmission electron microscope data. OM&IM model: The fusion model trained on optical microscope and immunofluorescence microscope data. The naming convention for the other models was the same. | ||||
| OM(No Seg) model | 72.90±3.67 | 72.80±3.62 | 72.87±3.49 | 72.60±3.66 |
| OM model | 77.50±3.06 | 78.13±3.91 | 76.93±3.17 | 76.93±2.98 |
| IM model | 87.08±4.25 | 87.53±3.62 | 87.27±4.12 | 86.87±4.04 |
| TEM model | 38.08±3.78 | 36.73±3.61 | 38.20±3.44 | 35.60±3.71 |
| OM&IM model | 87.92±3.06 | 88.60±3.81 | 88.00±3.00 | 87.87±3.44 |
| IM&TEM model | 87.09±2.43 | 87.00±2.20 | 86.93±2.72 | 86.67±2.39 |
| OM&TEM model | 75.83±2.12 | 76.73±3.19 | 75.87±2.07 | 75.60±2.12 |
| OM&IM&TEM model | 88.34±2.12 | 88.73±2.40 | 88.27±2.23 | 88.13±2.08 |