Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 28;11:1338247. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1338247

Table 1.

Clinical features, laboratory outcomes, treatment strategies, and outcomes of the 18 patients.

Patients Age (years)/gender Incubation (d) Skin Rash Enlarged lymph nodes Highest temperature (°C) Eosinophil count/Percent (*109/L/%) ALT (U/L) AST (U/L) Diagnostic score Outcome
1(2) 4/F 14 Yes Yes 40.0 2.94 >500 >400 6a Improved
2(3) 43/F 21 Yes Yes 38.5 1.05 108 66 7a Improved
3(4) 61/M 14 Yes No 38.8 5.90 21 28 5a Improved
4(4) 67/F 24 Yes Yes 38.5 1.13 102 69 7a Improved
5(4) 83/M 28 Yes No 37.2 3.25 104 90 6a Improved
6(4) 77/M 14 Yes No 38.5 1.30 105 36 5a Improved
7(4) 59/M 21 Yes No 38.6 1.10 117 59 5a Improved
8(4) 60/M 20 Yes Yes 38.9 0.80 240 161 7a Improved
9(4) 39/F 8 Yes Yes 40.0 2.60 13 22 6a Improved
10(4) 48/M 28 Yes No 38.0 13.1% 1,242 881 5a Improved
11(5) 74/F 9 Yes No 38.5 36% 64 90 5b Dead
12(6) 61/F 31 Yes - 39.2 2.68 27 - 7a Improved
13(6) 29/M 18 Yes - 39.7 1.64 30 - 4a Improved
14(6) 54/F 4 Yes - 39.8 0.90 39 - 4a Improved
15(6) 12/M 14 Yes - 40.0 0.79 1,099 - 6a Improved
16(6) 69/F 18 Yes - 38.3 1.47 52 - 5a Improved
17(6) 53/M 25 Yes - 39.8 2.60 212 - 8a Improved
18case 60/F 29 Yes Yes 39.5 1.33 114 68 8a Improved

aRegiSCAR scoring system (Total score < 2 excluded, 2–3: possible, 4–5: probable, and >5: definite) (14).

bJapanese Consensus Group Criteria (five criteria: atypical; seven criteria: typical) (13).