Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 27;14(4):2870–2883. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1204

Table 1. Peak CT number and CNR at different stenoses and reconstruction algorithms.

Percent stenosis HIR MBIR DLR 2nd generation DLR
25% plaque
   Peak CT number (HU) 342.4 (338.6–354.3) 334.5 (325.3–341.0) 365.3 (335.6–375.1) 357.7 (347.0–365.4)
   CNR 15.5 (14.7–16.1) 15.9 (15.5–17.9) 22.1 (20.6–23.5) 38.3 (36.4–40.2)
50% plaque
   Peak CT number (HU) 321.5 (301.3–339.5) 319.3 (298.1–335.3) 336.4 (312.3–352.4) 341.8 (321.1–349.7)
   CNR 14.4 (13.3–15.0) 15.1 (14.5–16.9) 20.4 (18.8–21.3) 36.5 (34.6–38.2)
75% plaque
   Peak CT number (HU) 209.5 (181.8–238.9) 216.3 (181.4–237.5) 210.9 (180.7–234.9) 223.4 (185.3–247.7)
   CNR 9.4 (8.2–10.5) 10.2 (8.9–11.7) 13.1 (10.5–14.3) 24.3 (20.1–26.3)
Background portion
   Mean CT number (HU) 0.6 −1.3 0.1 0.4
   Standard deviation (HU) 23.0 21.0 16.9 9.5

The peak CT number and CNR values are presented as median (interquartile range). CT, computed tomography; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio; DLR, deep learning-based reconstruction; HIR, hybrid iterative reconstruction; MBIR, model based iterative reconstruction.