Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;30(11):1545–1555. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i11.1545

Table 2.

Per-protocol data and analysis

Item
Overall population
Placebo treatment
AN-PEP treatment
Number of patients 37 20 17
Age in yr, median (range) 40 (29-46) 41 (31-48) 39 (28-45)
Females, n (%) 31 (83.8) 17 (85.0) 14 (82.3)
CeD serology in AU/mL, median (IQR)
IgA DGP at baseline 3 (1-5) 2 (1-5) 3 (1-5)
At end of study 3 (2-6) 3 (2-5) 3 (2-6)
IgA tTG at baseline 17 (7-43) 13 (6-36) 17 (11-48)
End of study 12 (6-48) 11 (5-20) 17 (7-62)
SCI global score at randomization median score (IQR) 36.0 (31.0-44.0) 35.0 (30.0-45.5) 40.0 (33.0-44.0)
End of the study median score (IQR) 33.0 (28.0-39.0) 32.0 (28.5-37.5) 35.0 (28.0-41.0)
SCI scores > 38 at randomization, n (%) 17 (45.9) 7 (35.0) 10 (58.8)
End of study, n (%) 10 (27.0) 5 (25.0) 5 (29.4)a
Stool GIP median and CI (IQR) of the average concentration for period, µg/g
Run-in period 0.40 (0-0.86) 0.37 (0-0.73) 0.55 (0-0.93)
Treatment period 0.30 (0.10-0.80)b 0.25 (0.11-0.79)c 0.32 (0-0.89)d
a

Comparison with run-in (McNemar test): P < 0.03.

b

Comparison with run-in values P (Wilcoxon): P = 0.43.

c

Comparison with run-in values P (Wilcoxon): P = 0.79.

d

Comparison with run-in values P (Wilcoxon): P = 0.33.

CeD: Celiac disease; CSI: Celiac symptom index; DGP: Deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies; GIP: Gliadin immunogenic peptides; IQR: Interquartile range; tTG: Tissue transgluteminase antibodies.