Table 3.
Results using the risk of bias tool 2
|
Ref.
|
D1
|
D2
|
D3
|
D4
|
D5
|
Overall
|
| Stahl et al[44], 2017 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Burmeister et al[43], 2011 | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Visser et al[42], 2018 | ! | + | + | + | + | ! |
| Markar et al[41], 2017 | ! | + | + | + | + | ! |
| Goense et al[40], 2017 | ! | + | + | + | + | ! |
| Favi et al[39], 2017 | ! | + | + | + | + | ! |
| Anderegg et al[35], 2017 | ! | + | + | + | + | ! |
| Spicer et al[38], 2016 | ! | + | + | + | + | ! |
| Luc et al[36], 2015 | ! | + | + | + | + | ! |
| Münch et al[37], 2018 | ! | + | + | ! | + | ! |
+: Low risk; !: Some concerns; -: High risk. D1: Randomization process; D2: Deviation from the intended interventions; D3: Missing outcome data; D4: Measurement of the outcome; D5: Selection of the reported result.