Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropharmacology. 2020 Dec 1;184:108415. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108415

Fig. 3. The sIPSC response to mCPBG depends on EtOH exposure and the exposure time.

Fig. 3.

A, B. The charge transfer and peak frequency of sIPSCs were not potentiated until EtOH was applied (paired t-tests *P <0.05, n = 5). C. EtOH potentiation of sIPSC charge transfer with different EtOH incubation times (unpaired t-tests *P <0.05, n = 4 for 0, 60 s conditions, n = 10 for 210 s condition). D. When a second mCPBG application was given at different time points after EtOH exposure, the potentiation of the mCPBG response was smaller at longer EtOH wash-out times (unpaired t-tests *P <0.05, **P <0.001, n = 6 for 90s condition, n = 9 for other conditions). E, F. The charge transfer and peak frequency of sIPSC responses to high K+ were not potentiated by EtOH exposure (n = 5).