Skip to main content
Parasitology logoLink to Parasitology
. 2021 Mar 11;148(8):895–903. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021000433

Toxoplasma gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals: a systematic review

Tooran Nayeri 1,2,3, Shahabeddin Sarvi 1,2, Ahmad Daryani 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11010209  PMID: 33691818

graphic file with name S0031182021000433_figAb.jpg

Key words: Cold-blooded, fish, reptile, shellfish, snake, Toxoplasma gondii

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is known for its ability to infect warm-blooded vertebrates. Although T. gondii does not appear to parasitize cold-blooded animals, the occurrence of T. gondii infection in marine mammals raises concerns that cold-blooded animals (frogs, toad, turtles, crocodiles, snakes, and fish) and shellfish are potential sources of T. gondii. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals worldwide. We searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 1 August 2020 for eligible papers in the English language and identified 26 articles that reported the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals. These articles were subsequently reviewed and data extracted using a standard form. In total, 26 studies [involving 9 cross-sectional studies including 2988 samples of cold-blooded animals (129 positive cases for T. gondii) and 18 cross-sectional studies entailing 13 447 samples of shellfish (692 positive cases for T. gondii)] were included in this study. Although this study showed that shellfish and cold-blooded animals could be potential sources of T. gondii for humans and other hosts that feed on them, further investigations are recommended to determine the prevalence of T. gondii in shellfish and cold-blooded animals.

Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is an obligate, intracellular, zoonotic, protozoan parasite that infects nearly all warm-blooded animals including humans, livestock, and some species of marine mammals as intermediate hosts and it is estimated that about 30% of the human population is affected by this parasite. In intermediate hosts, T. gondii multiplies by asexual reproduction leading to intracellular cysts in muscles and other organs. However, in felids as final hosts, sexual reproduction leads to discharge oocysts in their feces (Tenter et al., 2000; Dubey et al., 2008; Taghadosi et al., 2010; Aguirre et al., 2019). In immunocompetent humans, T. gondii infection is usually asymptomatic but may result in influenza-like symptoms. Although T. gondii can be serious, particularly for pregnant women, immunosuppressed individuals, or congenitally infected offspring (Tenter et al., 2000). Among immunocompromised individuals, T. gondii infection is common in late acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), in which 25% of patients develop toxoplasmic encephalitis (Jones et al., 2001; Aspinall et al., 2002). If T. gondii infection occurs during pregnancy, it can cause miscarriage or congenital anomalies that affect the brain, eyes, or other parts of the fetus (Kim et al., 2009). Disseminated toxoplasmosis and mental disorders can occur years after exposure to the parasite, and eye diseases have significant lifelong effects on a person's quality of life (Havelaar et al., 2012). The main routes of transmission of the infection are the contact with soil contaminated with T. gondii oocysts excreted from infected felids, ingesting meat containing encysted bradyzoites, consumption of water and vegetables containing sporulated oocysts, passing the parasite from the mother to the fetus through the placenta, blood transfusions, and organ transplants (Dubey and Beattie, 1988; Taghadosi et al., 2010; Koutsoumanis et al., 2018).

The viability of Toxoplasma oocysts varies according to environmental conditions. The oocyst can remain infectious in areas with high and low humidity as well as in hot and dry regions (Walker et al., 1992). Sporulated T. gondii oocysts can remain infectious in soil for at least 18 months (Esmerini et al., 2010). Freshwater runoff and drainage canals can transport cat feces containing oocysts in the soil to coastal waters through rivers and streams; the oocysts can contaminate freshwater and marine fauna (Fayer et al., 2004). The oocysts can survive for at least 6 months in seawater. In aquatic environments, bivalve shellfish such as mussels, oysters, clams, and cockles are filter feeders that have the unique ability to concentrate and retain suspended particles, including T. gondii oocysts from the environment after filtering a large volume of water (Putignani et al., 2011; Coupe et al., 2018). Experimental studies have shown that oocysts may remain viable for up to 85 days in oysters (Lindsay et al., 2004). The specific small subunit ribosomal RNA of T. gondii could be detected for up to 21 days after exposure in artificially exposed mussels, but viable oocysts were detected for only 3 days (Arkush et al., 2003). Consumption of waterborne pathogens leads to the storage of these pathogens in bivalves' tissues (Ribeiro et al., 2015). Massie et al. showed that T. gondii is not capable of infecting invertebrates and the parasite is unable to spread or survive in visceral organs such as muscles. Nevertheless, oocysts may be concentrated in organs such as the digestive tract and others that are in close contact with water containing the organism (Massie et al., 2010). Bivalve shellfish are known as excellent beacons for monitoring the health of estuarine ecosystems (Marquis et al., 2019) and can act as paratenic hosts for T. gondii oocysts (Cong et al., 2019) that in these hosts, the parasite lives without any developmental stage and is then transmitted to the next host. Bivalve shellfish is a source of infection for marine mammals when consumed as food (Cole et al., 2000). In some areas, bivalves are preyed upon by sea otters and other marine mammals, so obtaining and concentrating T. gondii oocysts by bivalves plays an important role in the mechanism of transmission of this parasite from land to sea (Miller et al., 2008). The occurrence of toxoplasmosis in marine mammals raises concerns that cold-blooded marine animals could be potential sources of T. gondii infection (Omata et al., 2005). Cole et al. in 2000 showed that marine mammals could become infected by consuming invertebrates. Besides, oysters can be a danger to public health because people like to eat oysters in nature. In some countries, mussels are very popular because of their taste and nutritional value. However, they may represent a danger to people given the oysters are eaten raw in most coastal areas of the world, such as China (Cong et al., 2019).

In the case of fish, a study in goldfish (Carassius auratus) showed that T. gondii tachyzoites could persist for up to 3 days after infection by intramuscular inoculation. This has also been confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of inoculated tissues and bioassay in mice with homogeneous tissues of infected fishes by intraperitoneal inoculation (Omata et al., 2005). Given that experimentally the tachyzoites of T. gondii survive for more than 7 days in cell culture at 37°C, it does not appear that the infection of the organism in cold-blooded animals is epidemiologically significant under natural conditions (Omata et al., 2005). Because oocysts-carrying fishes may be able to mechanically transmit viable parasites to larger predators at the top level of the food chain, including marine mammals, different routes of transmission should be considered. A new route for oocyst transmission involves the complex interaction of suspended bioparticles, biofilms, small invertebrates, and gastropods. Extracellular polymeric materials are relatively abundant in the marine environment and are involved in the transmission of soil-derived pathogens, including T. gondii, by combining marine macroaggregates or adhering to biofilms on the surface of seaweeds or other benthic organisms (Wotton, 2004; Shapiro et al., 2014). Most marine mammals feed on aquatic cold-blooded animals, and T. gondii does not multiply in cold-blooded animals (Bossart, 2011). T. gondii causes mortality in free-range marine mammals, including some endangered species (Cole et al., 2000; Conrad et al., 2005; Di Guardo and Mazzariol, 2013). Certain marine mammals (e.g. seals) serve as food animals for humans (Forbes et al., 2009; Tryland et al., 2014; Reiling et al., 2019). Therefore, fish can affect public health by infecting marine mammals. Also, the risk of T. gondii in fish, acting as carriers of oocysts on the body surface or transiently in the guts, is an occupational issue, and workers, especially pregnant women, should be aware of the risk of exposure to parasite during the primary production stages (fishing and harvesting) and while moving raw fish to produce fishery products and even some fish are eaten raw (Marino et al., 2019). The meat and eggs of reptiles are considered a delicacy as well as their leather has attracted the attention of many consumers and has led to the breeding of species such as crocodiles (Magnino et al., 2009; Hoffman and Cawthorn, 2012). Considering the importance of mollusks (shellfish) and some cold-blooded animals as seafood and the absence of sufficient information on the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals worldwide, this article aims to help to better understand the potential of these animals to transmit toxoplasmosis to humans based on the available literature.

Methods

Study design

This systematic review was performed following the preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statements (PRISMA) (Moher et al., 2015). The methods of this systematic review have already been published in the PROSPERO database under the following number CRD42020203071.

Search strategy

We identified original articles on the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals worldwide published in the English language from inception to 1 August 2020. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science using the terms (with the Boolean term OR): ‘toxoplasmosis’ OR ‘Toxoplasma gondii’ OR ‘T. gondii’ and cold-blooded and mollusk search terms (with the Boolean term OR): ‘reptile’ OR ‘snake’ OR ‘fish’ OR ‘shellfish’ OR ‘bivalve shellfish’ OR ‘oyster’ OR ‘mussel’ OR ‘mollusk’ OR ‘snail’ OR ‘turtle’ OR ‘cold-blooded’. Toxoplasma search terms and cold-blooded and mollusk search terms were combined with the AND Boolean term. Also, the bibliographies of any eligible papers identified were studied for additional references.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

We imported English language papers that have been formally published as journal articles and studies investigating the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals by microscopic techniques as well as molecular and serological methods. Narrative reviews, systematic reviews, experimental studies, and dissertations were excluded.

Study selection and data extraction

Two independent reviewers assessed titles and abstracts to obtain articles that met the inclusion criteria. If the title and abstract of the article could not be rejected with certainty by both researchers, the full text of the article was retrieved and assessed for eligibility. In this study, researchers did not have any disagreement and the coefficient of agreement (κ) was 100%. In the next step, two investigators extracted the data related to the retrieved papers and placed them in summary tables under the following headings: first author's last name, year of publication, place of study, samples, diagnostic methods, genes, type of antibody, cut-off, the total number of samples, number of Toxoplasma positive, and genotypes. The lists of extracted information are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1.

Data characteristics of the included cross-sectional studies for the prevalence of T. gondii in cold-blooded animals

Id First author's last name (year of publication) Place of study Type of animals Samples Diagnostic methods Type of antibody Cut-off Genes Total number of samples Toxoplasma positive n (%)
1 Levine and Nye (1976) USA Frog and toad Brain, small intestine, lung, heart, spleen, liver and kidney Microscopic 183 (Frog: 171 and toad: 12) 1 (0.54) [Frog: 1 (0.58) and toad: 0 (0)]
2 Taghadosi et al. (2010) Iran Fish (Salmonidae) Serum ELISA IgM and IgG ⩾0.183 50 IgM: 5 (10) and IgG: 0 (0)
3 Zhang et al. (2014) China Fish (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Cyprinus carpio, Monopterus albus and Carassius auratus) Digestive tract tissues PCR 1172 (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: 456, Cyprinus carpio: 309, Monopterus albus: 98 and Carassius auratus: 309) 1 (0.08) [Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: 1 (0.22), Cyprinus carpio: 0 (0), Monopterus albus: 0 (0) and Carassius auratus: 0 (0)]
4 Aakool and Abidali (2016) Iraq Fish (Cyprinuscarpi) Muscle, liver, enteric and gill PCR B1 96 [Muscle: 24, liver: 24, enteric: 24 and gill: 24 ] 18 (18.75) [Muscle: 0 (0), liver: 0 (0), enteric: 16 (66.66) and gill: 2 (8.33)]
5 Nasiri et al. (2016) Iran Reptile (snakes) Brain Nested-PCR GRA6 68 55 (80.88)
6 Feitosa et al. (2017) Brazil Reptile (turtle, snakes, lizards and crocodiles) Serum MAT IgM and IgG ⩾25 12 (Turtle: 5, snakes: 2, lizards: 2 and crocodiles: 3) 4 (33.3) [Turtle: 2 (40), snakes: 0 (0), lizards: 0 (0) and crocodiles: 2 (66.66)]
7 Anah and Al-Mayali (2018) Iraq Reptile (snakes) Liver, heart, kidney and brain PCR 18S rRNA 30 5 (16.66) [Liver: 4 (80), heart, kidney and brain: 1 (20)]
8 Marino et al. (2019) Italy Fish Intestines, gills, and skin/muscles Real-time PCR and digital PCR (dPCR) 1293 (441 pools; each pool: variable; skin/muscle: 147, gill: 147 and intestine: 147) 32 (7.26) [skin/muscle: 16 (10.88), intestine: 11 (7.48) and gills: 11 (7.48), in one group of Boops boops, DNA was detected in all types of tissues]
9 Ferreira et al. (2020) Brazil Reptile (crocodiles) Serum MAT and IHAT IgM and IgG MAT: 1:25 and IHAT: 1:8 84 MAT: 8 (9.5), IHAT: 26 (30.95) and MAT/IHAT: 7 (8.33)

ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; MAT, modified agglutination test; IHAT, indirect hemagglutination test; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IgM, immunoglobulin M; IgG, immunoglobulin G; n, number.

Table 2.

Data characteristics of the included cross-sectional studies for the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks (shellfish)

Id First author's last name (year of publication) Place of study Samples Diagnostic methods Genes Total number of samples Toxoplasma positive by molecular methods n (%) Genotypes: n
1 Miller et al. (2008) USA Haemocytes and D TaqMan, conventional PCR and PCR–RFLP B1 and SAG1 1109 1 (0.09) X
2 Esmerini et al. (2010) Brazil Tissues and the enclosed liquid Nested-PCR and PCR–RFLP B1 600 [300 (60 pools; each pool: 5 oysters) and 300 (20 pools; each pool: 15 mussels)] 10 (1.66) (2 pools of oysters (3.33) and 0 pools of mussels (0))
3 Putignani et al. (2011) Italy H, G, and D Nested-PCR and FLAG B1 1734 (186 pools; each pool: Variable; H: 62, G: 62 and D:62) 2 pools (1.08) [G pool: 1 (1.61), H pool: 1 (1.61) and D pool: 0 (0)]
4 Aksoy et al. (2014) Italy G and D Real-time PCR and HRM B1 53 7 (13.2) [D: 4 (7.54), G: 1 (1.88) and DG: 2 (3.77)]
5 Zhang et al. (2014) China Digestive tract tissues PCR ITS1 398 0 (0)
6 Shapiro et al. (2015) USA H Simplex PCR screening and multiplex genotyping assays and PCR-RFLP ITS1 and B1 959 13 (1.4) I: 2, II/III: 1, X: 2 and atypical: 2
7 Ribeiro et al. (2015) Brazil G and D PCR and nested-PCR SAG1 624 (208 pools; each pool: 3 shellfish; D: 208 and G: 208) PCR = 0 (0) and Nested-PCR = 17 (4.08) [D: 4 (1.92) and G: 13 (6.25)]
8 Marangi et al. (2015) Italy qPCR and HRM B1 113 (Turkey = 53 and Italy = 60) Turkey = 7 (13.2) and Italy = 0 (0)
9 Marquis et al. (2015) USA Rectum, G and mantle tissue PCR 230 4 (1.73)
10 Staggs et al. (2015) USA H, G and D qPCR or endpoint PCR Rep 529 gene 41 (Morro Bay: 15 and Point Lobos: 26) 19 (46.34) [Morro Bay = 5 (33.3): H: 4 and G: 1] and [Point Lobos = 14 (54): H: 7, G: 7, and D: 1]
11 Cong et al. (2017) China H, G and D TaqMan, conventional PCR and PCR–RFLP B1 998 26 (2.61%) #9: 1
12 Monteiro et al. (2019) Brazil G, GIT and IL Nested-PCR B1 400 (40 pools; each pool: 10 shellfish; G: 40, GIL: 40 and IL: 40) 7 (5.83) [G: 2 (5), GIT: 3 (7.5) and IL: 2 (5)]
13 Coupe et al. (2018) New Zealand H Nested-PCR, RT-PCR and PCR–RFLP dhps 104 13 (12.5)
14 Cong et al. (2019) China H, G and D Semi-nested PCR B1 2215 55 (2.48) [D: 23 (1.04), H: 33 (1.49), G: 5 (0.23), DH: 4 (0.18), HG: 1 (0.04), and DG: 1 (0.04)] #9: 4
15 Marquis et al. (2019) USA Mantle, G and rectum qPCR 1440 446 (31)
16 Tedde et al. (2019) Italy Internal tissues Semi-nested PCR B1 1620 (135 pools; each pool: 12 shellfish) 28 pools (20.74) (each pool: 12 shellfish)
17 Silva et al. (2020) Brazil G and visceral mass Nested-PCR SAG1 400 (80 pools; each pool: 5 shellfish) 2 pools (2.5) (each pool: 5 shellfish)
18 Santoro et al. (2020) Italy D qPCR and semi-nested PCR B1 409 43 (10.5)

H, hemolymph; G, gill; D, digestive gland; GIT, gastrointestinal tracts; IL, intervalvular liquid: DH, digestive gland and hemolymph; HG, hemolymph and gill; DG, digestive gland and gill; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PCR–RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; qPCR, quantitative PCR; FLAG, real-time PCR fluorescent amplicon generation assay; HRM, high-resolution melting analysis; n, number.

The quality of publications

In this review, the methodological quality of each of the selected publications was estimated based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria (Stang, 2010). This checklist includes three different categories, namely selection, comparability, and exposure. One of these cases is two options and can get two points in the evaluation. The selected publications were then classified as low quality (1–2), moderate quality (3–5), and high quality (6–7). The quality scores of different eligible studies are represented in online Supplementary Table S1.

Results

Study identification and selection

In the initial literature search, a total of 2534 records were identified; after removing duplicates and non-eligible papers based on title and abstract, 47 articles were selected for full-text screening. Of 47 studies, 18 articles were excluded because they were experimental design, two papers had irrelevant outcomes, one was a review article, and one was a dissertation. In addition, an article was added while checking references. Finally, 26 articles were reviewed. Cross-sectional articles published from 1976 to 2020 were included in the systematic review. Figure 1 briefly shows the search process in this systematic review article.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Flow diagram of the study design process.

Prevalence of T. gondii in cold-blooded animals

Cold-blooded animals in which the prevalence of T. gondii has been studied include frogs and toad (Levine and Nye, 1976), turtles (Feitosa et al., 2017), crocodiles (Feitosa et al., 2017; Ferreira et al., 2020), snakes (Nasiri et al., 2016; Anah and Al-Mayali, 2018), and fish (Taghadosi et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2014; Aakool and Abidali, 2016; Marino et al., 2019). One of these studies examined crocodiles and turtles (Feitosa et al., 2017). Fish and oysters were also studied in one study (Zhang et al., 2014). The included studies in our systematic review study were conducted in Iran (n = 3), followed by Brazil (n = 2), USA, Iraq, Italy, and China (n = 1).

A total number of 2988 samples of cold-blooded animals in nine studies were entered into the systematic review, including 146 serum samples (50 fish and 96 reptiles) were evaluated for anti-T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies using different serologic tests [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), modified agglutination test (MAT), and indirect hemagglutination test (IHAT)] out of which 17 cases (5 fish and 12 reptiles) were positive for anti-T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies. In a study by Ferreira et al. (2020), the number of positive cases was calculated based on MAT and IHAT findings. The result of the MAT is included here. Also, 2659 samples (1268 fish and 441 pools from 1293 fish as well as 98 reptiles) of different tissues, such as brain, intestines, lung, heart, spleen, liver, kidney, digestive tract tissues, gill, and skin/muscles, were examined for the prevalence of T. gondii using different molecular tests (PCR, nested-PCR, real-time PCR, and digital PCR) out of which 111 cases (19 fish and 32 pools from fish as well as 60 reptiles) were positive for T. gondii. One study used a microscopic method to diagnose T. gondii in amphibian (frog and toad), and of the 183 samples examined, only one was positive (Levine and Nye, 1976). In one study, the fishes were not tested separately, and each species was divided into groups of 3, 5, 6, 8 or 10 units according to the size and weight of the fish. From each fish, intestine, gills, and multiple aliquots of skin–skeletal muscles complex (maximum weight 10 g) were divided separately in asepsis (Marino et al., 2019). The genes used in these studies were B1, GRA6, and 18S rRNA (Aakool and Abidali, 2016; Nasiri et al., 2016; Anah and Al-Mayali, 2018). The characteristics of the included studies are depicted in Table 1.

Prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks (shellfish)

The prevalence of T. gondii in shellfish was investigated in 18 articles. As illustrated in Table 2, the identified studies were conducted in five countries distributed worldwide, including the USA (n = 5), Italy (n = 5), Brazil (n = 4), China (n = 3), and New Zealand (n = 1). A total number of 13 447 samples (8069 shellfish and 1327 pools from 5378 shellfish) were examined for the prevalence of T. gondii using different molecular tests [TaqMan, PCR, nested-PCR, semi-nested PCR, PCR–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP), real-time PCR, endpoint PCR, real-time PCR fluorescent amplicon generation assay (FLAG), high-resolution melting analysis (HRM), simplex PCR screening, and multiplex genotyping assays] out of which 692 cases (634 shellfish and 58 pools) were positive for T. gondii. In several studies, specimens were used as pooled samples (Esmerini et al., 2010; Putignani et al., 2011; Ribeiro et al., 2015; Monteiro et al., 2019; Tedde et al., 2019; Silva et al., 2020). The pools of several shellfish were formed based on the similarity of morphometric characteristics (Silva et al., 2020). Each pool was analysed as an experimental sample. Then, using a digital scale, the maximum amount of sample for DNA extraction was weighed according to the manufacturer of the kit protocol (Tedde et al., 2019). In these studies, the B1 gene of T. gondii as the target sequence was the most common gene for molecular assays (Miller et al., 2008; Esmerini et al., 2010; Putignani et al., 2011; Aksoy et al., 2014; Marangi et al., 2015; Shapiro et al., 2015; Cong et al., 2017, 2019; Monteiro et al., 2019; Tedde et al., 2019; Santoro et al., 2020).

Discussion

In this study, the current knowledge about the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks (shellfish) and cold-blooded animals is systematically described. According to Tables 1 and 2, the highest and lowest prevalence rates of T. gondii in cold-blooded animals were related to the studies performed by Nasiri et al. as 80.88% (55/68) (Nasiri et al., 2016) and Zhang et al. as 0.08% (1/1172) (Zhang et al., 2014). Moreover, the highest and lowest prevalence rates of T. gondii in shellfish were observed in studies conducted by Staggs et al. as 46.34% (19/41) (Staggs et al., 2015) and Zhang et al. as 0% (0/398) (Zhang et al., 2014). Differences in prevalence in various regions are influenced by factors such as species, the size of the sample, method of detecting, the type of environment, and geographical location (Cong et al., 2019). The low levels of basic sanitation in the area and the presence of various species of wild and domestic cats may be predisposing factors to increase the incidence of parasites (Ribeiro et al., 2015). Another important factor is the type of tissue samples. The gills and digestive glands are the places where parasites are most often identified (Robertson, 2007; Leal and Franco, 2008). Gills are ideal tissues for the detection of the parasite; oysters use a filter-feeding mechanism and can filter 5 L. Therefore, light particles such as T. gondii oocysts are retained in the gills (Ribeiro et al., 2015).

In most of the studies included in this systematic review, molecular methods have been used to investigate the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals (Zhang et al., 2014). In the PCR method, the PCR type, the copy number of the target gene in the sample, and the inhibitors in the tissue samples are the main factors that may affect the detection limit. Various tests used in studies (nested-PCR, semi-nested PCR, real-time PCR, digital PCR, TaqMan, PCR–RFLP, endpoint PCR, FLAG, HRM, simplex PCR screening, and multiplex genotyping assays) and targets (B1, ITS1, GRA6, 18S rRNA, rep 529 gene, dhps, and SAG1) seem to be more sensitive than conventional PCR (Hurtado et al., 2001). Among them, the B1 gene, which has 35 copies in the genome, is the most widely used. The ITS-1, a non-coding spacer region, is used as a target for the development of a PCR method for the differentiation of species among apicomplexans such as Toxoplasma (Hurtado et al., 2001; Jauregui et al., 2001). This region is conserved and the ITS-1 sequences showed 100% identity in 20 isolates of T. gondii (Homan et al., 1997). The results of a study showed that the detection limit of the ITS-1 PCR assay was 500 fg of T. gondii DNA. This amount of DNA is present in 4.5 tachyzoites (Opsteegh et al., 2010). In addition, false-positive amplification occurs frequently using the B1 and ITS-1 primer sets. It is not known whether the dhps gene is single or multiple. In one study, this gene was able to detect 50 oocysts in the hemolymph (Coupe et al., 2018). In comparison to dhps gene, the rep529 gene is purportedly the most sensitive (Su et al., 2010) because there are approximately 200–300 copies of this marker in the T. gondii genome (Homan et al., 2000; Costa and Bretagne, 2012).

Due to the technical limitations, the detection of the resistant form of the parasite (oocyst) in environmental samples is a scientific challenge. Although the nested-PCR method is very sensitive to detect T. gondii, because the oocyst has a very tough wall, it can interfere with DNA extraction. Therefore, it is difficult to detect oocysts in the environment (Ribeiro et al., 2015). In vitro encystation, grinding with glass beads, digestion with proteinase K, and the use of heat shocks are various techniques used to break the oocyst wall, but protocols were not standardized according to temperature and the number of freeze/thaw cycles (Dumètre and Dardé, 2003). The nested PCR method confirms the presence of T. gondii DNA, but does not differentiate between unsporulated and sporulated oocysts, the differentiation of these oocysts is important in disease transmission, as only sporulated T. gondii oocytes can be infectious (Dubey et al., 1998). To investigate this, a study used RT-PCR of the sporozoite-specific SporoSAG gene and detected T. gondii sporozoite mRNA in four of seven mussels (Coupe et al., 2018). Although in this study it is possible to detect SporoSAG mRNA in sporulated but non-viable oocysts, it is not possible to claim with certainty that infectious oocysts were found in these mussels (Coupe et al., 2018). In another study, nested PCR and FLAG were used. The results were consistent. Ease of use and speed, no need for post-reinforcement management for faster analysis, reduced risk of amplitude contamination and quantitative interpretation of results are some of the advantages typical of the real-time PCR technology that FLA demonstrates (Putignani et al., 2011). Some studies use the qPCR method. Despite the development of many qPCR techniques, some of them have limitations in the cost and performance of certain dyes in PCR. For example, TaqMan probes are expensive or dyes, which reduces reproducibility and/or analytical sensitivity (Bustin, 2002; Eischeid, 2011). Dyes such as SyberGreen may inhibit PCR, but EvaGreen is more suitable for routine multiplex qPCR applications due to its less inhibitory effect and lack of dye redistribution (Mao et al., 2007; Li et al., 2010; Eischeid, 2011).

To improve the sensitivity of the assay, it is best to use a hemolymph sample instead of whole tissue homogenates, as the hemolymph is less viscous and probably contains less material that may inhibit DNA amplification by PCR (Shapiro et al., 2015). Some authors report detection limits of 100 oocysts in mussel tissues homogenate (Esmerini et al., 2010), five oocysts in mussel hemolymph (Shapiro et al., 2015) and even a single oocyst in mussel hemolymph (Staggs et al., 2015). One study showed that the diagnosis of T. gondii in mussels that were experimentally infected using hemolymph and gill tissue was similar, while the detection of the parasite in the digestive gland was more sensitive in later depuration periods (Arkush et al., 2003). Another diagnostic method is bioassay in mice, in which the amount of material orally administered to each mice and sporulated or viable positive samples is important. In one study, the sensitivity of isolation by bioassay was 103 oocytes and the sensitivity of detection by nested-PCR was 102 oocytes (Esmerini et al., 2010).

Given that production of shellfish has been considered as an industry worldwide and the consumption of contaminated raw shellfish may represent a considerable health threat, the importance of T. gondii in raw or undercooked seafood to serve as a method of parasite transmission should not be ignored. China is the world's largest producer and consumer of shellfish (Cong et al., 2019), and France, Spain, and Italy produce two-thirds of all European mussels (Tedde et al., 2019). France produces >90% of cupped oysters (about 150 000 tons per year) and Spain <5000 tons as well as Italy produces <500 tons per year, which is not enough for internal consumption (Putignani et al., 2011). Oysters are cultured for the consumption of humans (Monteiro et al., 2019). In some parts of the world, such as Brazil, oyster farming is a source of income for families (de Souza Sampaio et al., 2019).

Evaluation of the genotype is an important variable in studying the risk of contamination in cold-blooded animals and potential subsequent infection in humans, because infection with different clonal lineages of T. gondii offers very different clinical consequences. Type I strains are highly pathogenic in mice and are associated with acquired ocular disease and diffuse congenital toxoplasmosis. However, the detection of type I strains in cases of chronic infection reactivation in immunocompromised patients or placentas with non-congenital infection suggests that they may also be responsible for asymptomatic infections in healthy patients (Dardé et al., 2007). Type II strains are the most common strains in human diseases. These strains are responsible for many cases of asymptomatic toxoplasmosis in Europe and are also pathogenic for immature fetuses and immunocompromised patients (Dardé et al., 2007). Besides the three main clonal lineages of T. gondii, atypical and recombinant strains have been identified (Dardé, 2008). The distribution of T. gondii genotypes varies in different geographical areas (Lehmann et al., 2006); in North America and Europe, three distinct lineages (types I–III), in South America, very diverse with few lineages, in China, seven genotypes (Zhang et al., 2014). In America, new genotypes X and A have been identified in sea otters (Sundar et al., 2008). Also, the T. gondii genotypes isolated from aquatic animals may be consistent with those isolated from terrestrial animals. Given that there is limited information on T. gondii genotypes from oysters, fish, and marine mammals in the world, further studies on T. gondii genotypes in aquatic animals are needed to provide stronger evidence for T. gondii transmission between aquatic animals and other animals, including humans. However, this risk factor was not specifically investigated in most studies; accordingly, this is considered as a basic gap. Also, a useful method for assessing the risk of infection in the consumer is to determine the parasitic load and parasite genotype, and the occurrence of T. gondii and the severity of the infection can be affected by the parasite form, dose, genotype, and immune status of the host (Santoro et al., 2020). There were several limitations in the present systematic review as follows: (1) a limited number of studies have examined the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals; (2) the use of English articles due to lack of fluency in other languages; (3) the use of various diagnostic methods without equal specificities and sensitivities; and (4) lack of access to published information on the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals from many parts of the world.

Conclusion

Toxoplasma gondii can cause infection ranging from asymptomatic or mild infection in immunocompetent people to miscarriage or serious consequences for the fetus in pregnancy, and fatal encephalitis in AIDS patients. Due to the occurrence of T. gondii in shellfish and cold-blooded animals, the consumption of these animals as raw or undercooked in some parts of the world can be a serious public health concern. Therefore, people need to be aware of the risk of acquiring T. gondii through eating raw seafood, especially fishes and bivalve mollusks. Finally, many questions remain to be answered in future investigations and it is required to carry out further studies to obtain more accurate details regarding the prevalence of T. gondii in mollusks and cold-blooded animals.

Acknowledgements

This article is an approved plan from the Student Research Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran (number: 8317).

Author contribution

A.D. conceived and designed the study, and S.S. critically revised the manuscript. T.N. searched the literature, extracted the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Financial support

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical standards

The code of ethics of this plan is (IR. MAZUMS.REC.1399.616).

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182021000433.

S0031182021000433sup001.docx (15.2KB, docx)

click here to view supplementary material

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. Aakool AA and Abidali SJ (2016) Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii in native freshwater fish Cyprinuscarpio in Wasit Province Iraq. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research 4, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguirre AA, Longcore T, Barbieri M, Dabritz H, Hill D, Klein PN, Lepczyk C, Lilly EL, McLeod R and Milcarsky J (2019) The one health approach to toxoplasmosis: epidemiology, control, and prevention strategies. EcoHealth 16, 378–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aksoy U, Marangi M, Papini R, Ozkoc S, Delibas SB and Giangaspero A (2014) Detection of Toxoplasma gondii and Cyclospora cayetanensis in Mytilus galloprovincialis from Izmir Province coast (Turkey) by real time PCR/high-resolution melting analysis (HRM). Food Microbiology 44, 128–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anah SA and Al-Mayali HMH (2018) Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii and Cryptosporidium spp. of some snakes in AL-Diwaniyah province/Iraq. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences 12, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arkush KD, Miller MA, Leutenegger CM, Gardner IA, Packham AE, Heckeroth AR, Tenter AM, Barr BC and Conrad PA (2003) Molecular and bioassay-based detection of Toxoplasma gondii oocyst uptake by mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis). International Journal for Parasitology 33, 1087–1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aspinall TV, Marlee D, Hyde JE and Sims PF (2002) Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in commercial meat products as monitored by polymerase chain reaction – food for thought? International Journal for Parasitology 32, 1193–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bossart GD (2011) Marine mammals as sentinel species for oceans and human health. Veterinary Pathology 48, 676–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bustin SA (2002) Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 29, 23–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cole RA, Lindsay D, Howe D, Roderick CL, Dubey J, Thomas N and Baeten L (2000) Biological and molecular characterizations of Toxoplasma gondii strains obtained from southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). Journal of Parasitology 86, 526–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cong W, Zhang N-Z, Hou J-L, Wang X-C, Ma J-G, Zhu X-Q and Chen G-J (2017) First detection and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in market-sold oysters in China. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 54, 276–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cong W, Zhang N-Z, Yuan D-Q, Zou Y, Li S and Liang Z-L (2019) Detection and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in market-sold mussels (Mytilus edulis) in certain provinces of China. Microbial Pathogenesis 136, 103687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Conrad PA, Miller M, Kreuder C, James E, Mazet J, Dabritz H, Jessup D, Gulland F and Grigg M (2005) Transmission of Toxoplasma: clues from the study of sea otters as sentinels of Toxoplasma gondii flow into the marine environment. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 1155–1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Costa J-M and Bretagne S (2012) Variation of B1 gene and AF146527 repeat element copy numbers according to Toxoplasma gondii strains assessed using real-time quantitative PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50, 1452–1454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coupe A, Howe L, Burrows E, Sine A, Pita A, Velathanthiri N, Vallée E, Hayman D, Shapiro K and Roe WD (2018) First report of Toxoplasma gondii sporulated oocysts and Giardia duodenalis in commercial green-lipped mussels (Perna canaliculus) in New Zealand. Parasitology Research 117, 1453–1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dardé M (2008) Toxoplasma gondii, ‘new’ genotypes and virulence. Parasite, 15, 366–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dardé M, Ajzenberg D and Smith J (2007) Population structure and epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii. In Weiss LM and Kim K (eds), Toxoplasma gondii the model apicomplexan: perspectives and methods. London, UK: Academic Press, 49–80. [Google Scholar]
  17. de Souza Sampaio D, Tagliaro CH, Schneider H and Beasley CR (2019) Oyster culture on the Amazon mangrove coast: asymmetries and advances in an emerging sector. Reviews in Aquaculture 11, 88–104. [Google Scholar]
  18. Di Guardo G and Mazzariol S (2013) Toxoplasma gondii: Clues From Stranded Dolphins. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Sage CA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dubey JP and Beattie C (1988) Toxoplasmosis of animals and man. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dubey JP, Lindsay DS and Speer CA (1998) Structures of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and biology and development of tissue cysts. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 11, 267–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dubey JP, Sundar N, Hill D, Velmurugan GV, Bandini LA, Kwok OC, Majumdar D and Su C (2008) High prevalence and abundant atypical genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii isolated from lambs destined for human consumption in the USA. International Journal for Parasitology 38, 999–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dumètre A and Dardé M-L (2003) How to detect Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in environmental samples? FEMS Microbiology Reviews 27, 651–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Eischeid AC (2011) SYTO dyes and EvaGreen outperform SYBR Green in real-time PCR. BMC Research Notes 4, 263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Esmerini PO, Gennari SM and Pena HF (2010) Analysis of marine bivalve shellfish from the fish market in Santos city, Sao Paulo state, Brazil, for Toxoplasma gondii. Veterinary Parasitology 170, 8–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fayer R, Dubey JP and Lindsay DS (2004) Zoonotic protozoa: from land to sea. Trends in Parasitology 20, 531–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Feitosa TF, Brasil AWDL, Parentoni RN, Vilela VLR, Nety TFL and Pena HFDJ (2017) Anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in mammals, birds and reptiles at the zoological-botanical park in João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 84, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ferreira FB, de Macêdo-Júnior AG, Lopes CS, Silva MV, Ramos ELP, Júnior ÁF, Vitaliano SN, Santiago FM, Santos ALQ and Mineo JR (2020) Serological evidence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in Melanosuchus niger (Spix, 1825) and Caimam crocodilus (Linnaeus, 1758). International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 12, 42–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Forbes LB, Measures L and Gajadhar A (2009) Infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii in northern traditional (country) foods prepared with meat from experimentally infected seals. Journal of Food Protection 72, 1756–1760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Havelaar AH, Haagsma JA, Mangen M-JJ, Kemmeren JM, Verhoef LP, Vijgen SM, Wilson M, Friesema IH, Kortbeek LM and van Duynhoven YT (2012) Disease burden of foodborne pathogens in the Netherlands, 2009. International Journal of Food Microbiology 156, 231–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoffman LC and Cawthorn D-M (2012) What is the role and contribution of meat from wildlife in providing high quality protein for consumption? Animal Frontiers 2, 40–53. [Google Scholar]
  31. Homan WL, Limper L, Verlaan M, Borst A, Vercammen M and van Knapen F (1997) Comparison of the internal transcribed spacer, ITS 1, from Toxoplasma gondii isolates and Neospora caninum. Parasitology Research 83, 285–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Homan W, Vercammen M, De Braekeleer J and Verschueren H (2000) Identification of a 200-to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 69–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hurtado A, Aduriz G, Moreno B, Barandika J and García-Pérez AL (2001) Single tube nested PCR for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii in fetal tissues from naturally aborted ewes. Veterinary Parasitology 102, 17–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jauregui L, Higgins J, Zarlenga D, Dubey J and Lunney J (2001) Development of a real-time PCR assay for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in pig and mouse tissues. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39, 2065–2071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jones JL, Kruszon-Moran D, Wilson M, McQuillan G, Navin T and McAuley JB (2001) Toxoplasma gondii infection in the United States: seroprevalence and risk factors. American Journal of Epidemiology 154, 357–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim JH, Kang KI, Kang WC, Sohn HJ, Jean YH, Park BK, Kim Y and Kim DY (2009) Porcine abortion outbreak associated with Toxoplasma gondii in Jeju Island, Korea. Journal of Veterinary Science 10, 147–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordóñez A, Bolton D, Bover-Cid S, Chemaly M, Davies R, De Cesare A, Herman L, Hilbert F, Lindqvist R, Nauta M, Peixe L, Ru G, Simmons M, Skandamis P, Suffredini E, Cacciò S, Chalmers R, Deplazes P, Devleesschauwer B, Innes E, Romig T, van der Giessen J, Hempen M, Van der Stede Y and Robertson L (2018) Public health risks associated with food-borne parasites. EFSA Journal 16, e05495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Leal DAG and Franco R (2008) Moluscos bivalves destinados ao consumo humano como vetores de protozoários patogênicos: metodologias de detecção e normas de controle. Continente 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lehmann T, Marcet PL, Graham DH, Dahl ER and Dubey J (2006) Globalization and the population structure of Toxoplasma gondii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, 11423–11428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Levine ND and Nye RR (1976) Toxoplasma ranae sp. n. from the leopard frog Rana pipiens Linnaeus. The Journal of Protozoology 23, 488–490. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li YD, Chu ZZ, Liu XG, Jing HC, Liu YG and Hao DY (2010) A cost-effective high-resolution melting approach using the EvaGreen dye for DNA polymorphism detection and genotyping in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 52, 1036–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lindsay DS, Collins MV, Mitchell SM, Wetch CN, Rosypal AC, Flick GJ, Zajac AM, Lindquist A and Dubey J (2004) Survival of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica). Journal of Parasitology 90, 1054–1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Magnino S, Colin P, Dei-Cas E, Madsen M, McLauchlin J, Nöckler K, Maradona MP, Tsigarida E, Vanopdenbosch E and Van Peteghem C (2009) Biological risks associated with consumption of reptile products. International Journal of Food Microbiology 134, 163–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mao F, Leung WY and Xin X (2007) Characterization of EvaGreen and the implication of its physicochemical properties for qPCR applications. BMC Biotechnology 7, 76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Marangi M, Giangaspero A, Lacasella V, Lonigro A and Gasser RB (2015) Multiplex PCR for the detection and quantification of zoonotic taxa of Giardia, Cryptosporidium and Toxoplasma in wastewater and mussels. Molecular and Cellular Probes 29, 122–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Marino AMF, Giunta RP, Salvaggio A, Castello A, Alfonzetti T, Barbagallo A, Aparo A, Scalzo F, Reale S and Buffolano W (2019) Toxoplasma gondii in edible fishes captured in the Mediterranean basin. Zoonoses and Public Health 66, 826–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Marquis ND, Record NR and Robledo JA (2015) Survey for protozoan parasites in Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) from the Gulf of Maine using PCR-based assays. Parasitology International 64, 299–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Marquis ND, Bishop TJ, Record NR, Countway PD and Fernández Robledo JA (2019) Molecular epizootiology of Toxoplasma gondii and Cryptosporidium parvum in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from Maine (USA). Pathogens 8, 125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Massie GN, Ware MW, Villegas EN and Black MW (2010) Uptake and transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by migratory, filter-feeding fish. Veterinary Parasitology 169, 296–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Miller M, Miller W, Conrad PA, James E, Melli A, Leutenegger C, Dabritz H, Packham A, Paradies D and Harris M (2008) Type X Toxoplasma gondii in a wild mussel and terrestrial carnivores from coastal California: new linkages between terrestrial mammals, runoff and toxoplasmosis of sea otters. International Journal for Parasitology 38, 1319–1328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P and Stewart LA (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews 4, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Monteiro TR, Rocha KS, Silva J, Mesquita GS, Rosário MK, Ferreira MF, Honorio BE, Melo HF, Barros FN and Scofield A (2019) Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in Crassostrea spp. oysters cultured in an estuarine region in eastern Amazon. Zoonoses and Public Health 66, 296–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nasiri V, Teymurzadeh S, Karimi G and Nasiri M (2016) Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii in snakes. Experimental Parasitology 169, 102–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Omata Y, Umeshita Y, Murao T, Kano R, Kamiya H, Kudo A, Masukata Y, Kobayashi Y, Maeda R and Saito A (2005) Toxoplasma gondii does not persist in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Journal of Parasitology 91, 1496–1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Opsteegh M, Langelaar M, Sprong H, den Hartog L, De Craeye S, Bokken G, Ajzenberg D, Kijlstra A and van der Giessen J (2010) Direct detection and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in meat samples using magnetic capture and PCR. International Journal of Food Microbiology 139, 193–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Putignani L, Mancinelli L, Del Chierico F, Menichella D, Adlerstein D, Angelici M, Marangi M, Berrilli F, Caffara M and di Regalbono DF (2011) Investigation of Toxoplasma gondii presence in farmed shellfish by nested-PCR and real-time PCR fluorescent amplicon generation assay (FLAG). Experimental Parasitology 127, 409–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Reiling SJ, Measures L, Feng S, Boone R, Merks H and Dixon BR (2019) Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis sp. and Neospora caninum-like parasites in seals from northern and eastern Canada: potential risk to consumers. Food and Waterborne Parasitology 17, e00067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ribeiro L, Santos L, Brito P Jr, Maciel B, Da Silva A and Albuquerque G (2015) Detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in Brazilian oysters (Crassostrea rhizophorae). Genetics and Molecular Research: GMR 14, 4658–4665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Robertson L (2007) The potential for marine bivalve shellfish to act as transmission vehicles for outbreaks of protozoan infections in humans: a review. International Journal of Food Microbiology 120, 201–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Santoro M, Viscardi M, Boccia F, Borriello G, Lucibelli MG, Auriemma C, Anastasio A, Veneziano V, Galiero G and Baldi L (2020) Parasite load and STRs genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from Mediterranean mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) in Southern Italy. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shapiro K, Krusor C, Mazzillo FF, Conrad PA, Largier JL, Mazet JA and Silver MW (2014) Aquatic polymers can drive pathogen transmission in coastal ecosystems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 20141287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Shapiro K, VanWormer E, Aguilar B and Conrad PA (2015) Surveillance for Toxoplasma gondii in California mussels (Mytilus californianus) reveals transmission of atypical genotypes from land to sea. Environmental Microbiology 17, 4177–4188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Silva CM, Silva ALP, Watanabe KFC, Chaves Bezerra NP, Bezerra DC, Gomes HM, Freire TB, Santos LSD, Carvalho Neta AVD and Silva EMC (2020) First report of detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in oysters (Crassostrea sp.) in the state of Maranhão. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 29, e003720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Staggs SE, Keely SP, Ware MW, Schable N, See MJ, Gregorio D, Zou X, Su C, Dubey J and Villegas EN (2015) The development and implementation of a method using blue mussels (Mytilus spp.) as biosentinels of Cryptosporidium spp. and Toxoplasma gondii contamination in marine aquatic environments. Parasitology Research 114, 4655–4667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology 25, 603–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Su C, Shwab E, Zhou P, Zhu X and Dubey J (2010) Moving towards an integrated approach to molecular detection and identification of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitology 137, 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sundar N, Cole RA, Thomas N, Majumdar D, Dubey J and Su C (2008) Genetic diversity among sea otter isolates of Toxoplasma gondii. Veterinary Parasitology 151, 125–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Taghadosi C, Kojouri GA and Taheri MA (2010) Detection of Toxoplasma antibodies in sera of Salmonidae by ELISA. Comparative Clinical Pathology 19, 203–206. [Google Scholar]
  69. Tedde T, Marangi M, Papini R, Salza S, Normanno G, Virgilio S and Giangaspero A (2019) Toxoplasma gondii and other zoonotic protozoans in Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and blue mussel (Mytilus edulis): a food safety concern? Journal of Food Protection 82, 535–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tenter AM, Heckeroth AR and Weiss LM (2000) Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 1217–1258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tryland M, Nesbakken T, Robertson L, Grahek-Ogden D and Lunestad B (2014) Human pathogens in marine mammal meat–a northern perspective. Zoonoses and Public Health 61, 377–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Walker J, Nokes D and Jennings R (1992) Longitudinal study of Toxoplasma seroprevalence in South Yorkshire. Epidemiology & Infection 108, 99–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wotton RS (2004) The essential role of exopolymers (EPS) in aquatic systems. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 42, 57–94. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang M, Yang Z, Wang S, Tao L, Xu L, Yan R, Song X and Li X (2014) Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in shellfish and fish in parts of China. Veterinary Parasitology 200, 85–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182021000433.

S0031182021000433sup001.docx (15.2KB, docx)

click here to view supplementary material


Articles from Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES