Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 12;24:269. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06419-w

Table 2.

Mean scores for pregnant women’s perceived empathy, PCS and MCS (n = 311)

Scales Mean ± SD Minimum score Maximum score Range
IRI total score 41.6 ± 9.0 13.0 69.0 0.0 ~ 88.0
 Perspective taking 9.4 ± 1.1 0.0 20.0 0.0 ~ 20.0
 Fantasy 10.6 ± 2.9 2.0 21.0 0.0 ~ 24.0
 Empathic concern 15.9 ± 3.6 3.0 24.0 0.0 ~ 24.0
 Personal distress 5.7 ± 0.4 0.0 20.0 0.0 ~ 20.0
Purpose-designed empathy questionnaire
 Purpose-designed Item 1 3.3 ± 0.8 1.0 5.0 1.0 ~ 5.0
 Purpose-designed Item 2 2.5 ± 0.8 1.0 4.0 1.0 ~ 5.0
 Purpose-designed Item 3 3.5 ± 0.8 1.0 5.0 1.0 ~ 5.0
 Purpose-designed Item 4 2.7 ± 0.7 1.0 4.0 1.0 ~ 5.0
 Purpose-designed Item 5 3.6 ± 0.8 1.0 5.0 1.0 ~ 5.0
 Purpose-designed Item 6 2.7 ± 0.8 1.0 4.0 1.0 ~ 5.0
SF-12
 Physical component summary (PCS) 41.6 ± 7.6 18.6 58.4 0.0 ~ 100.0
 Mental component summary (MCS) 47.7 ± 9.1 21.7 64.2 0.0 ~ 100.0

Direction: Higher scores = better outcomes

Abbreviations: IRI Interpersonal Reactivity Index; Purpose-designed Item 1: “During pregnancy, my husband is able to deeply resonate with my feelings.” and “How often does this happen?”; Purpose-designed Item 2: “During pregnancy, my husband is able to deeply resonate with my feelings.”; Purpose-designed Item 3: “During pregnancy, my husband understands me objectively.” and “How often does this happen?”; Purpose-designed Item 4: “During pregnancy, my husband understands me objectively.”; Purpose-designed Item 5: “During pregnancy, my husband expresses his understanding to me through verbal or non-verbal communication.” “How often does this happen?”; Purpose-designed Item 6: “During pregnancy, my husband expresses his understanding to me through verbal or non‐verbal communication.”, SF-12 Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey, SD standard deviation