Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 4;13(7):2107. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072107

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Local interpretation was achieved through individual SHAP analyses for each patient. (A) The prediction was conducted with an ICP of 40 cmH2O, yielding a SHAP ICP score of 40. Notably, a Hunt–Hess grade of 5 and an ONSD of 0.61 exerted a substantial influence, indicating a high ICP value. (B) The prediction was made with an ICP of 18 cmH2O, resulting in a SHAP ICP score of 16.50. In this scenario, a Hunt–Hess grade of 4 positively impacted the prediction, while age had a minimal negative impact.