Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 30;16(7):1011. doi: 10.3390/nu16071011

Table 3.

Results of the methodological quality assessment of included studies—PEDro scale [34].

Study, Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total % Quality Score
Beck et al., 2018 [38] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G
Brandeberger et al., 2018 [39] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 8 72.7 G
Cheikh et al., 2018 [40] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Cheikh et al., 2020 [41] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Czucejko et al., 2019 [42] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Farjallah et al., 2018 [43] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G
Farjallah et al., 2022 [44] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Farjallah et al., 2023 [45] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Farjallah et al., 2022 [46] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 100 E
Farjallah et al., 2020 [47] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G
Ghatassi et al., 2016 [48] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Ghatassi et al., 2024 [49] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Ghatassi et al., 2014 [50] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G
Khaleghi-Mamaghani et al., 2021 [51] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G
Leonardo-Mendonça et al., 2017 [52] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G
Maldonado et al., 2012 [53] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G
Mero et al., 2006 [54] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G
Ochoa et al., 2011 [55] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Ortiz-Franco et al., 2017 [56] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Paryab et al., 2021 [57] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 90.9 E
Souissi et al., 2018 [58] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 81.8 G

Abbreviations: 0 = unfulfilled criterion; 1 = fulfilled criterion; E = excellent; G = good. PEDro questionnaire items = 1: eligibility criteria; 2: random assignment; 3: hidden allocation; 4: baseline comparison; 5: blind subjects; 6: blind therapist; 7: blind evaluators; 8: adequate follow-up; 9: intention-to-treat analysis; 10: comparison between groups; 11: point estimates and variability.