Table 2.
Title of the Study, First Author, Year [Ref] |
Type of Study | Objective | Population | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Feasibility and Safety of a Pilot Randomized Trial of Infection Rate: Neutropenic Diet Versus Standard Food Safety Guidelines, Moody K, 2006 [45] | Multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial | To evaluate the infection rate in pediatric cancer patients randomized to the ND or FDA-approved FSGs and assess tolerability and adherence to the diets. | 19 pediatric oncology patients (ND n = 9; FSGs n = 10) | Infection rates for children on the ND were similar to those of patients following FSGs; the adherence rate was 94% for the neutropenic diet and 100% for the food safety guidelines. |
A randomized trial of the effectiveness of the neutropenic diet versus food safety guidelines on infection rate in pediatric oncology patients, Moody K, 2018 [46] | Prospective randomized controlled trial | To study neutropenic infection rates in pediatric oncology patients randomized to FSGs versus the ND plus FSGs; study adherence to the diets and acceptability. | 150 patients were randomly assigned to FSGs (n = 73) or ND + FSGs (n = 77) | ND offers no benefit over FSGs in the prevention of infection; diet adherence in the FSGs group was higher than in the ND + FSGs group. |
Lack of effectiveness of neutropenic diet and social restrictions as anti-infective measures in children with acute myeloid leukemia, Tramsen L, 2016 [47] | Multicenter analyses on AML-BFM 2004 | To check the effectiveness of non-pharmacological measures, including ND. | 339 patients treated in 37 institutions. | Dietary restrictions were not significantly associated with a decreased incidence of FUO, bacteremia, pneumonia, and gastroenteritis. |
ND = neutropenic diet; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FSGs = food safety guidelines; AML = acute myeloid leukemia; BFM = Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster; FUO = fever of unknown origin.