Table 6.
Approach | Objective | Methods | Feedback | Machining Process |
---|---|---|---|---|
Offline | Power-constrained optimization [31] | An iterative optimization approach constrained with the spindle power to estimate feedrates minimizing the production time | Offline spindle power and feedrate (in the previous operation) | Milling |
Offline | Spindle power control [14] | Multi-objective optimization is developed to improve machining efficiency and reduce fluctuations in the spindle power based on an ANN-based model of spindle power | Milling | |
Offline | Cutting force control [164] | A machining time minimizer is developed based on the simulation of cutting engagements and predicting cutting forces. The optimizer maximizes the cutting forces through the tool path by manipulating the feedrate | Milling | |
Online | Cutting force control [165] | An online force control system was developed that automatically adjusts feedrate based on the force signal. To prevent vibration damage, a chatter suppression control module was added to the system by analyzing the force feedback. | Force sensor | Turning |
Online | Cutting force control [166] | Nonlinear mechanistic machining force model identification with Bayesian inference and recursive least square estimator | Directional strain gauge-based force sensors | Turning |
Offline/ Online |
Cutting force control [162] | Combination of offline cutting force optimization using artificial neural network (ANN) as the predictive model and particle swarm optimization (PSO) along with online feedforward force control using neural control to adjust the feedrate by assigning a feedrate override percentage | Cutting force signals | Milling |
Offline/ Online |
Cutting force, dynamic stability and cutting temperature [13] | A hybrid optimization, monitoring, and control (HOMC) system was introduced considering the machining primary limits of chatter, tool deflection, and thermal stresses | Spindle power, vibration and acoustic emission | Milling |