. 2024 Mar 28;24(7):2168. doi: 10.3390/s24072168

Table A1.

Results comparing different values of the hyperparameter p from the generalized exponential function.

p	QWK ¹	MS ¹	MAE ¹	CCR ¹	1-off ¹	mIoU ¹
1.0	$0 . 9667_{0.0119}$	$0 . 8515_{0.0600}$	$0 . 0667_{0.0225}$	$0 . 9539_{0.0147}$	$0 . 9794_{0.0084}$	$0 . 8885_{0.0311}$
1.1	$0 . 9518_{0.0358}$	$0 . 7942_{0.1782}$	$0 . 0963_{0.0727}$	$0 . 9341_{0.0505}$	$0 . 9698_{0.0225}$	$0 . 8615_{0.0899}$
1.2	$0 . 9464_{0.0324}$	$0 . 7910_{0.1122}$	$0 . 1055_{0.0607}$	$0 . 9289_{0.0382}$	$0 . 9658_{0.0230}$	$0 . 8505_{0.0708}$
1.3	$0 . 9517_{0.0265}$	$0 . 7911_{0.1293}$	$0 . 0961_{0.0489}$	$0 . 9343_{0.0298}$	$0 . 9698_{0.0196}$	$0 . 8593_{0.0586}$
1.4	$0 . 9482_{0.0417}$	$0 . 8016_{0.1312}$	$0 . 1010_{0.0699}$	$0 . 9317_{0.0407}$	$0 . 9673_{0.0300}$	$0 . 8581_{0.0706}$
1.5	$0 . 9620_{0.0187}$	$0 . 8397_{0.0705}$	$0 . 0788_{0.0359}$	$0 . 9433_{0.0241}$	$0 . 9780_{0.0121}$	$0 . 8775_{0.0471}$
1.6	$0 . 9622_{0.0203}$	$0 . 8464_{0.0711}$	$0 . 0780_{0.0366}$	$0 . 9438_{0.0232}$	$0 . 9782_{0.0144}$	$0 . 8790_{0.0453}$
1.7	$0 . 9525_{0.0379}$	$0 . 8197_{0.1140}$	$0 . 0939_{0.0688}$	$0 . 9362_{0.0431}$	$0 . 9701_{0.0262}$	$0 . 8662_{0.0761}$
1.8	$0 . 9635_{0.0169}$	$0 . 8446_{0.0943}$	$0 . 0743_{0.0310}$	$0 . 9479_{0.0196}$	$0 . 9779_{0.0125}$	$0 . 8862_{0.0405}$
1.9	$0 . 9473_{0.0630}$	$0 . 8056_{0.1244}$	$0 . 1007_{0.1052}$	$0 . 9320_{0.0654}$	$0 . 9680_{0.0378}$	$0 . 8637_{0.0986}$
2.0	$0 . 9537_{0.0377}$	$0 . 8039_{0.1553}$	$0 . 0934_{0.0722}$	$0 . 9354_{0.0453}$	$0 . 9712_{0.0272}$	$0 . 8644_{0.0817}$

¹ The best performance of each metric is highlighted in bold face font, while the second one is in italics.