Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 9;21(2):121–146. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00844-0

Table 2 |.

Key genome-wide association studies identifying LCINS risk loci, stratified by population ancestry

Study Study cohorts: sample size (cases/controls) Chromosomal region Reference SNP cluster ID (rsID) Associated genetic loci OR (discovery; 95% CI)
European
Li et al. (2010)160 Mayo Clinic: 377/377
MDACC: 328/407
Harvard University: 92/161
UCLA: 91/439
13q31.3 rs2352028 GPC5 1.46 (1.26–1.70; P = 5.94 × 10−6)
Wang et al. (2010)338,a Candidate gene study: 259/553 5p15.33 rs4975616 CLPTM1L–TERT 0.69 (0.55–0.85; P = 7.95 × 10−4)
Sptiz et al. (2011)252,a Pathway-based (inflammatory) association study: 451/508 12q13.13 rs12809597 ACVR1B 0.72 (0.59–0.88; P = 0.0012)
Hung et al. (2019)339 ILCCO: 3,636/6,295 5p15.33 rs380286; rs31490; rs4975616 CLPTM1L–TERT rs380286: 0.77 (0.72–0.82; P=5.31×10−16) rs31490: 0.77 (0.72–0.82; P=4.32×10−16)
rs4975616: 0.78 (0.73–0.83; P=1.04×10−14)
East Asian
Hsiung et al. (2010)162,b GELAC (Han Chinese): 584/585
GELAC (replication set): 610/560
CAMSCH: 287/287
SNU: 259/293
SWHS: 209/213
WHLCS: 207/207
KNUH: 121/119
KUMC: 95/87
GEL-S: 194/546
NJLCS: 203/203
5p15.33 rs2736100 CLPTM1L–TERT 1.54 (1.41–1.68; P=2.60×10−20); 1.62 (1.40–1.87; P=8.51×10−11) when heterozygous; 2.54 (1.95–2.83; P=3.05×10−19) when homozygous
Hosgood et al. (2012)340,b GELAC, CAMSCH, SNU, KUMC, KNUH, SWHS, GEL-S, SLCS, FLCS and TLCS: 3,467 (2,557 LUAD, 309 SCC)/3,787 in total 3q28 rs10937405; rs4488809 TP63 rs10937405: 0.80 (LUAD: 0.74–0.87; P=7.1×10−8); 0.82 (SCC: 0.67–0.99; P=0.037) rs4488809: 1.16 (LUAD: 1.08–1.24; P=7.4×10−5)
Shiraishi et al. (2012)341 Japanese population study: 1,722/5,846 6p21.3 rs3817963 BTNL2 1.18 (1.12–1.24; P=2.7×10−10)
17q24.3 rs7216064 BPTF 1.20 (1.13–1.26; P=7.4×10−11)
Lan et al. (2012)163,b FLCCA: 5,510/4,544 (from 14 studies) and 1,099/2,913 (replication set) 10q25.2 rs7086803 VTI1A 1.32 (1.24–1.41; P=5.04×10−17)
6q22.2 rs9387478 ROS1, DCBLD1 0.85 (0.81–0.90; P=7.79×10−8)
6p21.32 rs2395185/rs28366298 HLA class II region 1.16 (1.09–1.23; P=2.60×10−6)
Ahn et al. (2012)171 Korean population study: 446/497 (discovery set) and 434/1,000 (replication set) 18p11.22 rs11080466; rs11663246 FAM38B (PIEZO2), APCDD1, NAPG rs11080466: 0.61 (0.44–0.77; P=2.68×10−5)
rs11663246: 0.60 (0.48–0.76; P=1.74×10−5)
Kim et al. (2013)175,b Korean population study: 285/1,455 (discovery set), 294/495 (replication set 1) 546/733 (replication set 2) 2p16.3 rs10187911 NRXN1 1.47 (1.22–1.78; P<0.001)
Wang et al. (2016)174,b FLCCA: 6,877/6,277 (from 4 studies) and 5,878/7,046 (replication set) 6p21.1 rs7741164 FOXP4, FOXP4–AS1 1.18 (1.10–1.26; P=2.05×10−6)
9p21.3 rs72658409 CDKN2B, CDKN2B–AS1 0.75 (0.67–0.83; P=1.37×10−7)
12q13.13 rs116101143 ACVR1B 0.88 (0.83–0.93; P=2.21×10−6)
Shi et al. (2023)159 FLCCA: 4,438/4,544
NJLCS: 1,923/3,544
NCC: 3,291/19,910
ACC: 1,471/2,564
2p23.3 rs682888 DTNB 0.89 (0.86–0.93; P=4.94×10−10)
3q22.2 rs137884934 PIK3CB 0.81 (0.74–0.89; P=6.33×10−6)
4p13 rs117715768 KCTD8 1.24 (1.14–1.34; P=4.48×10−7)
4q32.1 rs1373058 PDGFC 1.10 (1.05–1.15; P=8.55×10−6)
6p12.1 rs531557 GCLC 0.90 (0.87–0.94; P=7.73×10−7)
7q31.33 rs4268071 GPR37 1.39 (1.25–1.54; P=7.27×10−10)
10q26.13 rs10901793 FAM53B, METTL10 1.10 (1.06–1.14; P=3.14×10−7)
11q12.2 rs174559 FADS1 0.91 (0.88–0.94; P=6.10×10−7)
15q21.2 rs764014 RFX7 0.91 (0.88–0.95; P=5.75×10−7)
15q21.3 rs71467682 FGF7, SECISBP2L 0.91 (0.87–0.95; P=2.46×10−6)
19p13.1 rs116863980 PALM 1.31 (1.16–1.47; P=7.94×10−6)
East Asian and European
Shi et al. (2023)159 ILCCO multi-ancestry meta-analysis (similar effect sizes observed in both groups): 11,753/30,562 (East Asian) and 11,273/55,483 (European) 2p11.2 rs1130866 SFTPB 1.08 (P=1.56×10−8)c
4q32.2 rs2320614 NAF1 1.08 (P=6.51×10−9)c
16q23.3 rs34638657 MPHOSPH6 1.09 (P=2.19×10−9)c
18q12.1 rs638868 GAREM1 1.08 (P=3.60×10−8)c

The table lists the novel risk loci identified in each study. ACC, Aichi Cancer Center (Japan); CAMSCH, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Hospital; FLCCA, Female Lung Consortium in Asia; FLCS, Fudan Lung Cancer Study (China); GELAC, Genetic Epidemiological Study of Lung Adenocarcinoma (Taiwan); GEL-S, Genes and Environment in Lung Cancer, Singapore study; ILCCO, International Lung Cancer Consortium; KNUH, Kyungpook National University Hospital (South Korea); KUMC, Korea University Medical Center; LCINS, lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; MDACC, MD Anderson Cancer Center; NCC, National Cancer Center of Japan Research Institute; NJLCS, Nanjing Lung Cancer Study (China); OR, odds ratio; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SLCS, Shenyang Lung Cancer Study (China); SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; SNU, Seoul National University (South Korea); SWHS, Shanghai Women’s Health Cohort Study (China); TLCS, Tianjin Lung Cancer Study (China); WHLCS, Wuhan Lung Cancer Study (China); UCLA, University of California Los Angeles (USA).

a

These studies are candidate gene and pathway-based analyses, which interrogate predefined biological pathways or gene sets; these are distinct from traditional genome-wide association studies and do not require genome-wide significance; therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution.

b

These studies were focused specifically on women.

c

No confidence intervals provided in summary statistics.