Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 10;8(1):e002533. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002533

Table 2.

Household characteristics of children living in households with two National Child Measurement Programme participants

Two school measurement programme-participant households (n=19 702)
n % 95% CI
IMD quintile*
1 (most deprived) 10 375 52.6 51.9, 53.3
 2 7836 39.8 39.1, 40.5
3 1292 6.6 6.2, 6.9
4 156 0.8 0.7, 0.9
5 (least deprived) 43 0.2 0.2, 0.3
Number of children in the household
 2 6449 32.8 32.1, 33.4
3 7228 36.6 36.0, 37.3
4 or more 6025 30.6 30.0, 31.2
Household composition
Working adults with children 14 976 76.0 75.4, 76.6
Single working-aged adult with children 2873 14.6 14.1, 15.1
Three generation and skipped generation 1853 9.4 9.0, 9.8
Property classification
Flat 10 260 52.1 51.4, 52.8
Terraced house 8154 41.4 40.7, 42.1
Other 1288 6.5 6.2, 6.9

*2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintile assigned based on the child’s home address postcode as recorded by the school where the child participated in the National Child Measurement Programme. The 2015 IMD accounts for socioeconomic characteristics in lower layer super output areas (LSOAs), small geographies typically comprising an average population of 1500 people or 650 households. IMD score is derived from Indices of Deprivation, which cover seven domains: income; employment; education, skills and training; health; crime; barriers to housing and services; and living environment. The IMD score for each LSOA in England is ranked, from most to least deprived, and divided into 10 equal groups indicating the most deprived 10% of LSOAs to the least deprived 10% of LSOAs, nationally. The school measurement programme dataset includes each child’s IMD 2015 score and decile.

IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.