Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 15;2014(1):CD002832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002832.pub3

Wetzel 1991.

Methods Allocation: randomised ‐ no further details.
 Blindness: double ‐ no further details.
 Raters: not stated to be independent of treatment.
 Design: single‐centre.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia 'with positive symptoms' (ICD‐9).
 Excluded: people with substance dependence, epilepsy, pregnancy, organic psychoses, relevant other diseases or people currently treatment with depot antipsychotics.
 N = 41.
 Sex: 16M, 25F.
 Age: mean ˜ 40 years.
 History: not indicated.
 Setting: hospital.
Interventions 1. Perazine: dose starting at 50 mg/day then flexible dose (max. 900 mg/day). N = 21.
 2. Zotepine: dose starting at 100 mg/day, then flexible dose (max. 600 mg/day). N = 20.
Chloralhydrate (sleep medication), flurazepam, diazepam and biperiden (anticholinergic) were allowed as concomitant medication.
Outcomes Leaving the study early.
 Global state: GAS.
 Mental state: BPRS.
 Extrapyramidal side effects.
 Vital signs: EEG, ECG, laboratory.
Unable to use ‐
 Mental state: AMDP, FSCL‐NL, FSUCL (no mean or no SD, or no usable data). 
 Global state: CGI (no usable data). 
 Adverse effects: AIMS, Gerlach scale (no mean or no SD).
Notes Jadad = 3
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk randomized ("Zufallsprinzip") (p.24)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not indicated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk "Double blind" (p.23)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Unclear risk "Double blind" (p.23)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk "Double blind" (p.23)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Unclear risk "Double blind" (p.23)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 20% dropout rate, not evenly distributed (3/21 and 5/20)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk No SDs or mean values provided
Other bias Low risk No other bias

General abbreviations:
 HPL = haloperidol
 EPS = extrapyramidal side‐effects.
 M = males
 F = females
 N = number
 mg = milligram
 SD = standard deviation
 ECG = electrocardiogram
 EEG = electroencephalogram

Diagnostic tools:
 DSM‐III‐R = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders, third edition, revised
 ICD‐9 = International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision

Global effect scales:
 CGI = Clinical Global Impression (Guy 1976)
 GAS = Global Assessment of Symptoms Scale (Endicott 1976)

Mental state scales:
 AMDP = Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Methodik und Dokumentation in der Psychiatrie (AMDP 1981)
 BPRS = Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (Overall and Gorham 1970)
 FSCL‐NL = Collegium Internationale Psychiatricae Scalarum, CIPS 1986
 FSUCL = Collegium Internationale Psychiatricae Scalarum, CIPS 1986
 SANS = Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (Andreasen 1989)

Adverse effects scales:
 AIMS = Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (Guy 1976)
 EWL = Eigenschaftswörterliste (Janke 1977)
 Gerlach Scale (Gerlach 1983)
 NGI = (no reference)
 SAS = Simpson and Angus Scale (Simpson and Angus 1970)
 Webster Scale (no reference)