Table 2. The effect of the dietary E. faecium supplementation on the growth performance of the weanling pigs.
Items | CON | TRT1 | TRT2 | TRT3 | TRT4 | SEM1 | P-value | |
linear | quadratic | |||||||
Body weight (kg) | ||||||||
Initial | 6.38 | 6.37 | 6.38 | 6.38 | 6.38 | 0.00 | 0.740 | 0.779 |
Week 1 | 8.01 | 8.27 | 8.21 | 8.15 | 8.11 | 0.06 | 0.009 | 0.754 |
Week 3 | 13.63 | 13.86 | 14.04 | 14.80 | 14.96 | 0.19 | 0.274 | 0.318 |
Week 6 | 25.73 | 26.38 | 26.67 | 26.71 | 27.93 | 0.19 | < 0.000 1 | 0.123 |
Week 1 | ||||||||
ADG (g) | 234 | 246 | 254 | 261 | 270 | 9 | 0.011 | 0.777 |
ADFI (g) | 315 | 333 | 342 | 350 | 354 | 9 | 0.006 | 0.408 |
G : F | 0.739 | 0.738 | 0.741 | 0.749 | 0.761 | 0.010 | 0.468 | 0.288 |
Week 3 | ||||||||
ADG (g) | 401 | 412 | 419 | 428 | 435 | 11 | 0.212 | 0.861 |
ADFI (g) | 567 | 595 | 614 | 626 | 639 | 13 | 0.034 | 0.355 |
G : F | 0.708 | 0.692 | 0.682 | 0.689 | 0.689 | 0.009 | 0.144 | 0.148 |
Week 6 | ||||||||
ADG (g) | 576 | 588 | 600 | 612 | 614 | 12 | 0.013 | 0.666 |
ADFI (g) | 923 | 938 | 951 | 952 | 964 | 16 | 0.064 | 0.739 |
G : F | 0.624 | 0.626 | 0.631 | 0.637 | 0.643 | 0.006 | 0.028 | 0.664 |
Overall | ||||||||
ADG (g) | 461 | 476 | 483 | 484 | 489 | 4 | < 0.000 1 | 0.127 |
ADFI (g) | 703 | 726 | 739 | 730 | 743 | 7 | 0.001 | 0.125 |
G : F | 0.656 | 0.656 | 0.654 | 0.663 | 0.659 | 0.004 | 0.285 | 0.928 |
1Standard error of means – significant results were defined as less than P < 0.05 and statistically highly significant as P < 0.001
ADG = average daily gain; ADFI = average daily feed intake; CON = basal diet; G : F = gain : feed; TRT1 = basal diet + 2.5 × 105 cfu/g E. faecium; TRT2 = basal diet + 1.29 × 106 cfu/g; TRT3 = basal diet + 1.15 × 107 cfu/g; TRT4 = basal diet + 1.1 × 108 cfu/g