Skip to main content
Food Science & Nutrition logoLink to Food Science & Nutrition
. 2024 Jan 3;12(4):2537–2550. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3936

Indigenous knowledge and nutritional and morphological characterization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moecnh) varieties in Western Ethiopia

Hasebu Yassin Mohammed 1, Tadesse Fikre Teferra 2, Getachew Sime 3,
PMCID: PMC11016411  PMID: 38628224

Abstract

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moecnh) is a versatile crop that is widely grown in western Ethiopia, despite that it is less researched. This study, therefore, investigates the traditional knowledge, nutritional, and morphological characteristics of two commonly grown okra varieties (Kenketse and Sharma) in west Ethiopia. A semi‐structured questionnaire, checklist, and observations were used to collect primary data from households, key informants, and farms. In addition, proximate composition parameters like moisture content, total ash, crude fat, crude protein, crude fiber, utilizable carbohydrates, and gross energy fruits were measured through laboratory analysis. Fruit morphological traits, including fruit dimensions such as length and width, were determined using a digital Vernier caliper. For data analysis, SPSS software was used. The results revealed that the entire plant is used for both food and ethnomedicinal purposes. Curing ailments such as stomach pain, constipation, wound/cut, heart discomfort, back pain, malaria, diarrhea, and amoebae were among the medical benefits of okra. The proximate composition (%) on a dry matter basis of okra fruits differed significantly (p < .05) by cultivar type and drying method. Moisture (3.69%–5.24%), total ash (6.60%–8.01%), crude fat (4.87%–8.58%), crude protein (4.06%–5.23%), crude fiber (12.85%–15.26%), utilizable carbohydrate (56.42%–67.63%), and gross energy contents (326–341 kcal) were the ranges of the various proximate and energy levels. Morphological characteristics of fruit and leaf length, width, and length‐to‐width ratio varied with cultivar type, where Sharma had more than double the length of Kenketse (70.1 vs. 187.1 mm). Despite being an undervalued native vegetable crop in Ethiopia, the study's findings show that okra is a multipurpose vegetable for promoting human health and ensuring food and nutritional security. Therefore, stepping up its production, marketing, and consumption could help alleviate the food shortage and improve human nutrition and health in the study areas.

Keywords: ethno‐botany, ethnomedicine, indigenous knowledge, indigenous okra, proximate composition, traditional uses


Geometric physical characteristics of two okra fruits showed huge variation in terms of their length, width, and length‐to‐width ratio.

graphic file with name FSN3-12-2537-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Plants are used as pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, cosmetics, and food supplements, even as traditional sources of medicines and they also play a vital role as the sources of prescription drugs in allopathic medicines (Das et al., 2019). Among plant sources, vegetables play important roles in human nutrition and health (Oguntibeju et al., 2013). This is due to their high levels of vitamins, minerals, dietary fiber, and phytochemicals, in addition to protein and energy (Dias & Ryder, 2011). Commonly, vegetables provide the health‐promoting properties, nutrients, and enzymes necessary for proper body functions (Gemede et al., 2015), while no single vegetable provides all the nutrient requirements (Uusiku et al., 2010; Wallace et al., 2020).

Ethiopia is the home for a high diversity of traditional knowledge and practices about the uses of traditional medicine due to the existence of different ethnic groups and complex cultural diversity Assen et al., 2021). In addition, it has a vast genetic diversity of plant species, including important indigenous vegetables. Some of the indigenous vegetables that are native to Ethiopia include okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in west Ethiopia, jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius) in the Afar region, moringa (Moringa olifera) in south Ethiopia, and anchote (Coccinia abyssinica) in west Ethiopia (Kumar et al., 2013; Simonne et al., 2010). Among these vegetables, okra is a multipurpose crop due to the various uses of its edible parts, like the fresh leaves, buds, flowers, pods, stems, and seeds (Yonas et al., 2014) which are widely consumed in western Ethiopia. The whole plant is edible and has various food, non‐food, and medical applications, and the seed is the nutritionally richest part of the okra (Adelakun et al., 2009). It has long been used as a vegetable and a source of dietary medicines (Benchasri, 2012; Elkhalifa, Alshammari, et al., 2021).

Okra grows preferably in well‐drained, humus‐rich fertile soil with a pH ranging from 6 to 6.7 (Jain et al., 2012), grows in poor soil with intermittent moisture (Ogungbenle & Omosola, 2015), adapts to a wide range of climatic conditions (Akanbi et al., 2010), and grows best in hot weather (temperatures above 26°C) (Ndunguru & Rajabu, 2004). It is an economically important vegetable crop (Ismail & Ibn Idriss, 2013), is widely cultivated throughout the year in the tropics (Singh et al., 2014), and is grown as a garden crop or on large commercial farms (Mokgalabone et al., 2023).

Okra is known by different local names in its area of origin (Benishangul Gumuz Regional State): Kenkatse (Berta), Andeha (Gumuz), and Bamuya (Afaan Oromo) (Gemede et al., 2015), which are some of the popular local names of okra. It is a major traditional vegetable among the Berta community (one of the ethnic groups in the region) and is consumed as both a fruit and a vegetable. It is a subsistence crop commonly produced to fill food shortages throughout all months of the year. The cultivation of okra has strong cultural ties with the Berta communities, since it is used as cultural food during festivals, weddings, and parties and consolidation days. It is also believed that okra makes lactating mothers healthier and stronger (Kushi et al., 2023).

Despite the nativity of okra to Ethiopia and its large importance to local communities for multiple purposes, there are only limited studies to promote and enhance the food value of okra. It is considered as an orphan crop (Kushi et al., 2023). In addition, there is limited market value for okra, partly due to the limited knowledge on the specific variety/genotype for food, non‐food, and medicinal uses. It is an underutilized indigenous plant species in Ethiopia that is a locally available and affordable source of energy and important nutrients (Negash et al., 2023).

There is a lack of awareness and information regarding the importance of okra, particularly its medicinal benefits, morphological features, genetic diversity, nutritional composition, and food value for humans. It is a native plant that is underutilized. Nevertheless, research and development efforts to capitalize on the potential in food and nutrition values, ethnomedicinal effects, and morphological traits of many okra varieties are negligible. Such studies are intended to promote the ethnomedicinal benefits, food and nutritional qualities, and genetic diversity of okra, which will play an important role in alleviating malnutrition, reducing food insecurity, and improving human health and nutrition. Therefore, the overall objective of this research was to look into indigenous knowledge and nutritional and morphological characterization of two okra genotypes in western Ethiopia.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Description of the study site

The research site is in Benishangul Gumuz Regional State (Figure 1). It is located 661 km west of Ethiopia's capital city, Addis Ababa. It is located at 34,012′32″ N and 10,035′45″ E. According to the Population and Housing Census of Ethiopia in 2007, the total population was estimated to be 87,366 (44,176 males and 43,190 females), with approximately 74% residing in rural regions. It had a population density of roughly 37.7 people per km2 and covered 2371 km2.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Map of the study area.

2.2. Agro‐ecology, climate, and vegetation

The climate is humid and hot, with distinct dry and wet seasons. The annual average temperature and total annual rainfall range from 15.4°C to 29.6°C and 1132.9 mm, respectively. In general, the climate is favorable for both annual and perennial crops (Tamrat et al., 2016). It is divided into two traditional climatic zones based on altitudinal variation: lowlands and midlands. The district's geography is hilly (30%), plain (52%), and depression (18%). The elevation varies between 558 and 2729 m above sea level. It is characterized by rugged terrain and plain surfaces. The study site has a variety of vegetation due to variations in soil, temperature, and human activity. The area contains dense vegetation, with tropical bamboo forest, acacia and other trees, tall grasses, herbs, bushes, and shrubs (Mohammed, 2010).

2.3. Data collection methods

Two methods of data collection were used: (1) Ethno‐botanical data on the food value and medicinal benefits of okra, as well as an assessment of the physical characteristics of the two most commonly utilized okra varieties (Kenkatse and Sharma), were collected. This was accomplished by conducting a household survey utilizing a questionnaire and key informant interviews, and (2) collecting data on the nutritional quality of two commonly produced okra fruits for laboratory examination. The nutritional composition of Kenkatse and Sharma okra fruits was examined using electric drying and sun drying methods.

2.3.1. Techniques for selecting study sites, households, and key informants

The study site was chosen using the purposive sampling technique since it is in an area where the okra plant is commonly cultivated and used for a variety of reasons. Simple random sampling procedures were used to pick 164 sample households from three typical villages. The adoption of a simple random sample size was justified due to the homogeneity of the households in terms of socio‐cultural and economic elements, as well as the representation of the research communities that widely cultivate okra. In addition, nine key informants were chosen from each of the three communities using a purposive sampling technique (Table 1). Those who were familiar with indigenous knowledge of using okra as food, traditional medicine, and plant parts used as food and medicine were key informants. They were agricultural specialists, herbalists, elders, and model farmers. The key informants were chosen on the advice of elders and local officials (development agents and village administrative leaders).

TABLE 1.

Study village, sample village, and sample respondents.

Study village Household Key informant Total %
Buldigilu 37 9 46 23
Nebar Komoshiga 53 9 62 31
Gambeshiri 29 9 38 19
Tsentsehallu 45 9 54 27
Total 164 36 200 100

Data from 164 households was acquired through household head interviews utilizing semi‐structured questionnaires (Table 1). The key informant interviews were conducted using a questionnaire checklist.

Yamane (1967) was used to determine the sample size.

n=N/1+Ne2

where n is the sample size, N is the population size, and e is the acceptable sampling error.

2.3.2. Plant part sampling and laboratory analysis (Figures 2, 3, 4)

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Pictures while measuring okra pods on the farm and pods of two cultivars in the laboratory.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Slicing, drying, and powdering samples of Kenketse and Sharma.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Digestion, distillation, and titration of samples of Kenketse and Sharma.

Sampling procedures

Fresh (completely immature fruit) samples of okra were randomly collected from farms. The fresh okra fruits were then dried and ground in the same agricultural areas.

Laboratory analysis of the nutritional compositions of okra

After collecting samples of the two most common types of okra pods, the proximate composition (such as moisture, crude protein, fat, ash, crude fiber, utilizable carbohydrate, and gross energy) of the fruits was analyzed using AOAC (AOAC, 2000) protocols.

Determination of moisture content

The moisture content of two okra cultivars' pod samples (Kenketse and Sharma) was measured using standard methods (AOAC, 2000) sub‐component 925.09 by oven drying. A clean aluminum dish was dried in a drying oven (DHG‐9055A) at 105°C for 1 h, then chilled in a desiccator (CSN‐SIMAX) for roughly 30 min before being weighed.

The samples prepared in duplicate for each treatment were thoroughly mixed, and approximately 10 g and 3.0 g of samples on a dry basis were weighed. The pre‐weighted plates and their contents were dried for 12–16 h at 85–100°C in the drying oven. After drying, the samples were cooled in a desiccator for 30 min before being re‐weighed to achieve a constant weight. The moisture content was estimated using the formula below:

MC%db=W2W1W3W1W3W1*100

where MC = moisture content, W1 = weight of empty crucible, W2 = weight of crucible with fresh sample, W3 = weight of crucible with dried sample.

Determination of total ash content

The total ash content of pod (Kenketse and Sharma) samples was determined using established methods (AOAC, 2000) by burning known weights of the samples in a muffle furnace (Carbolite CSF 1200) at 550°C until a white ash was formed. Each dish received 3.0 g of material from each treatment in duplicate. The samples were placed in the muffle furnace (Carbolite CSF 1200) and incinerated for 3 h at 550°C. The samples were extracted from a Muffle Furnace and cooled; they appear clean and white. A few drops of de‐ionized water and strong nitric acid were added, dried, and returned to a muffle furnace, where they were tested for evidence of carbon. Finally, the samples were removed from the muffle furnace and immediately placed in a desiccator to cool to ambient temperature, and each dish plus ash was reweighed. Using the following formula, the weight of total ash was computed by difference and expressed as a percentage of samples:

AC%db=W2W1W3*100

where AC = ash content, W1 = weight of empty crucible, W2 = weight of crucible with ash, W3 = weight of sample.

Determination of crude fat content

The crude fat content of okra pod samples (Sharma and Kenketse) was determined using standard procedures (AOAC, 2000) and subcomponent 920.39 in a Soxhlet extractor. The cleaned extraction flasks with boiling chips were dried in Oven Drying (DHG‐ 9055A) for 1 h at 90°C, cooled in desiccators (with granular silica gel desiccants) for 30 min, and weighed. A 2 cm layer of fat‐free cotton was placed on the bottom of the extraction thimble. In the extraction thimbles, 3.0 g of okra samples from each treatment (raw or control, boiled after peeling, and boiled before peeling) were placed in triplicate and then coated with a 2 cm layer of fat‐free cotton.

The sample‐filled thimbles were put in the Soxhlet extraction chamber (Shanghai Qianjian Instrument Co., Ltd.). The cooling water was turned on, and 500 mL of diethyl ether was introduced into the extraction flask via the condenser. The extraction lasted roughly 4 h. The extraction flasks were withdrawn from the extraction chamber and placed in the drying oven at 90°C for about 30 min, then cooled to room temperature in the desiccator for about 30 min before re‐weighing the flask with the extract.

Determination of crude protein content

The protein content of pod (Kenketse and Sharma) samples was determined using conventional methods (AOAC, 2000) by the Kjeldahl method, which included digestion, distillation, and titration, as follows:

Digestion

A small digestion flask (250 mL) was filled with 0.2 g of the material. Two catalyst tablets (anhydrous sodium sulfate + copper sulfate) were added to the sample, along with 3.5 mL of 98% H2SO4. The flask's contents were then heated on an electrical heater for 2 h until the color changed to blue‐green. After that, the tubes were withdrawn from the digester and left to cool.

Distillation

The digested sample was passed to the distillation unit along with 15 mL of 40% NaOH. The ammonia was placed in a 100 mL conical flask with 10 mL of boric acid and 3–4 drops of methyl red indicator. The distillation process was repeated until the volume reached 50 mL.

Titration

The flask's contents were titrated against 0.1 N HCl. The titration reading was noted. The crude protein was determined using the equation below:

CP%db=TB*N*14*100*6.25WS*1000

where CP = crude protein, T = titration reading, B = blank titration reading, N = normality of HCl, WS = weight of sample, 1000 = to convert to mg, 6.25 = protein factor.

Determination crude fiber contents

The crude fiber content was measured using conventional procedures (AOAC, 2000). Approximately 1 g of defatted pod samples were treated sequentially with boiling solutions of H2SO4 (0.26 N) and KOH (0.23 N). The residue was then filtered, washed, and put in a crucible, which was then placed in an oven set to 105°C for 18–24 h. The sample‐filled crucible was weighed and incinerated in a muffle furnace at 500°C. The crude fiber was determined using the equation below:

FC=W2W1W3

where CF = crude fiber, W1 = weight of crucible with sample before incineration, W2 = weight of crucible with sample after incineration, W3 = weight of sample.

Determination of utilizable carbohydrates

Utilizable carbohydrate (UC) content was calculated using the mathematical expression as follows:

%UC=100%moisture+%crude protein+%crude fiber+%totalash+%crudefat
Determination of gross energy

The percent calories in the chosen samples were determined by multiplying the crude protein and carbohydrate percentages by 4 and the crude fat percentage by 9. The results were then converted to kilocalories per 100 g of sample.

Determination of the morphological characteristics of okra

To establish the mean dimension of the pods, 17 replications of each cultivar (Kenketse and Sharma) were chosen at random (Figure 2). The length (L) and width (W) of the pods were measured using a digital Vernier caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. The two axial dimensions were used to calculate the mean length of pods and seeds. The length was chosen as the largest dimension, and the width was picked as the shortest. The arithmetic mean diameter (Da) and geometric mean diameter (Dg) were computed using the relationships shown below (Fadavi et al., 2013). The D a and D g values were calculated using the following formula (Equations 1 and 2):

Da=L+W/2 (1)
Dg=LW/20.5 (2)

2.4. Data analysis

2.4.1. Ethno‐botanical data analysis

An Excel spreadsheet was utilized for descriptive statistics, such as percentage, frequency distribution, and graphs, and SPSS software (version 20) was utilized for the analysis of ethno‐botanical data generated through semi‐structured questionnaires.

2.4.2. Informant consensus

To test the reliability of information during the interview, respondents were contacted at least twice for similar responses, and the validity of the information was proved and recorded. When a respondent's information deviates from the initial notion, it is discarded because it is deemed untrustworthy (Alexiades, 1996; Seddig & Leitgöb, 2018).

2.4.3. Experimental data analysis

A factorial design was employed for the proximate study of the two types of okra in both fresh and dried variants. All experiments for the chemical analysis were duplicated, while the physical attributes were reproduced 17 times. The data was analyzed with a statistical tool (SAS software) and an analysis of variance (ANOVA). To separate the means, Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) was applied, and the results were reported as mean with least squares means with standard errors.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Demographic characteristics

Age, gender, educational status, occupation, marital status, income level, and ethnicity were among the socioeconomic characteristics of the sample households studied. In terms of gender, the number of female‐headed households (57.5%) was higher than that of their male‐headed counterparts (42.5%). The dominance of female‐headed households is attributed to their cultural attachment to the plant from seedbed preparation through harvesting, owing to the customs and beliefs of the local communities. The majority of households (44%) had an age range of 18–40 years, followed by 41–60 years. In terms of educational status, the majority of households (40.5%) had formal primary education, while 32.5% were illiterate. Farming (72.5%) was the most common occupation, followed by engaging in traditional healing (11%). The majority of households (55.5%) were classified as medium‐income, as high‐income (24.5%), and as low‐income (20%).

3.2. Ethno‐botanical status, cultivars, cultivation purposes, and growing season

The cultivated herb known as “Kenketse” was familiar to all of the households. The majority of households (98%) used two local names for the two main cultivars, Kenketse adaru and Sharma. Most of them (70%) used three sub‐cultivars of “Kenketse adaru,” namely Kenketse bertha, Kenketse futie, and Kenketse begnenie, while 17.9% used only Kenketse futie and 1% used only Kenketse begnenie. Likewise, the majority of households (68.5%) used two sub‐cultivars of “Sharma,” namely Shrama dhugurie and Sharma tsurignie, where 28% used Sharma dhugurie and the remaining 3.5% used Sharma tsurignie. This demonstrates that the majority of households consume several okra sub‐cultivars.

In accordance with consumption preferences, a small percentage of households grew only Kenketse adaru, while the vast majority of households grew both cultivars (Kenketse adaru and Sharma). Okra was grown by every household mainly for food and income sources as well as ethnomedicine. Regarding production seasons, although it was grown in both the rainy and irrigated seasons, Kenketse adaru was mostly grown in the rainy season. In contrast, Sharma was primarily grown in both irrigated and rain‐fed systems, though some households only grew it in irrigation or rain‐fed systems (Figure 5). This shows that okra is grown all year round, suggesting that it may help ensure food security, generate income, and have ethnomedical benefits. Previous studies also demonstrate okra to be an important vegetable crop with a diverse array of nutritional qualities and potential health benefits (Das et al., 2019; Elkhalifa, Alshammari, et al., 2021).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Growing seasons of two main cultivars of okra.

Concerning life span, Sharma was the fastest‐growing okra cultivar, particularly Sharma dhugurie, which completes its life cycle in 40–50 days, whereas Sharma tsurignie completes its life cycle in 60–80 days. Kenketse adaru, on the other hand, takes 120–190 days from planting to harvesting. This shows that, compared to the Kenketse cultivar, Sharma can improve food security and generate revenue more quickly. More significantly, cultivating various cultivars with distinct life cycles could guarantee that the benefits are available all year long.

3.3. Traditional uses and edible parts

The traditional utilization and consumption of okra are mostly tied to traditional knowledge and socio‐cultural practices. It was attested that the different parts of the plant are edible: pod (100%), seed (99%), flower (83%), leaf (65.5%), and root (28%) (Table 2). This illustrates that every part of the plant is edible and economically important to the local community. The seeds can also be used as a coffee substitute. Stems are also used as fodder for livestock and as fuel to cook food. Aside from that, because the stem's rough hairs instantly kill snakes upon contact, it has historically been used to keep snakes out of houses. This result is in line with previous studies showing that the different parts of okra are edible and provide additional cooking and medicinal benefits (Elkhalifa, Alshammari, et al., 2021; Romdhane et al., 2020).

TABLE 2.

Edible parts of okra.

No. Edible plant parts Households %
Response Frequency
1 Leaf Yes 137 68.5
No 63 31.5
2 Flower Yes 166 83
No 34 17
3 Seed Yes 199 99.5
No 1 0.5
4 Pod/Fruit Yes 200 100
No 0 0
5 Root Yes 56 28
No 144 72

3.3.1. Mode of preparation and uses as food

Okra is a versatile vegetable that can be used to prepare a variety of dishes. In addition to food, the pod is used for making luxury drinks, such as soup, coffee, juice, and others, based on the communities' desires and experiences. The pod is the most useful part of the crop, serving several functions:

Stew (wat) preparation

Stew preparation “draw” is the most popular mode of preparation of okra, where all parts are processed either in fresh or dry powdered forms. To prepare stew, fresh leaves, flowers, bark, and pods are harvested, well‐washed, and ground to make dry powders. It is then mixed with additional ingredients such as boiled split beam, red pea, green pea, black pea, split pea, soybean, mung bean, split mung, and water before being heated until well‐cooked and spiced/seasoned. Sew is typically served with local stable bread, such as injera, aljizira, alguraza, or porridge. The mucus‐like liquid is used to thicken strews, which are popular among the local community, as also reported previously (Adiaha, 2017; Goksen et al., 2023).

Soup preparation

The popular “draw” (sticky) soup, also known as “kenketse soup,” is often cooked with either red meat or alone (Gemede et al., 2018). To make soup, immature fresh “kenketse bertha” is picked, washed, chopped, or sliced into tiny sizes, then combined with additional ingredients, such as ground red meat, sliced carrot, sliced onion, oil, dried fish, and water. It is then boiled for half an hour to preserve the volatile nutrients. The soup is utilized as a fast‐track to meet the immediate requirement for food by locals who have been hungry for several hours.

Salad preparation

The pods are chopped and boiled with pepper to make okra salad, which is served with local foods such as injera, aljizra, and alguraza, which are made of powdered corn, sorghum, teff, or rice. This demonstrates that the pod can be consumed as a vegetable, either raw or cooked. The local communities also utilize okra seeds as a coffee replacement when there is a coffee scarcity or lack of access to coffee (Gemede et al., 2015).

3.4. Ethnomedicinal uses

Most households utilized the entire plant to heal or treat a variety of diseases, including back pain, heart discomfort, constipation, gastric infection, malaria, diarrhea, amoeba, and many sorts of wounds (Table 3). A larger number of households (55.5%) used all parts of the plant, while 27.5% used pods, 11% used seeds, 3.5% used flowers, 1.5% used barks/resins, and 1% used leaves to treat various diseases (Figure 6).

TABLE 3.

Ethnomedicinal Benefits of Okra in the Study Areas.

No. Disease Plant part used Method of preparation
1 Gastric disease Flower, pod, leaf, and bark Decoction or soup
2 Constipation Fresh seed Raw
3 Wound healing/cut Flower, pod, leaf, and bark Crushed raw
4 Heart pain Fresh seed Raw
5 Malaria Dry seed Juice of okra mixed with cardamom and prepared as infusion
6 Diarrhea Pod Powdered and mixed with powdered maize prepared as soup
7 Amoebae Root Infusion
8 Back pain Fresh pod Decoction

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Okra‐treated diseases in the research areas.

The different parts of the plant were utilized to treat various ailments (Tables 3 and 5; Figure 5). Gastric infection, constipation, wound/cut, and heart ache were among the common ailments healed by the plant. It is also highly recommended for the treatment of severe diabetes patients. Okra is a multifunctional crop for treating both human and livestock ailments (Abd El‐Hack et al., 2018; Uba et al., 2022).

TABLE 5.

Average proximate composition of okra pods by drying methods.

Drying method MC (db%) TA (%) CFat (db%) CPr (db%) CF (db%) UCa (db%) GE (cal.)
Oven 3.07b 7.66a 5.77b 3.12b 13.55b 66.834a 331.72a
Sun 6.07a 6.83b 6.75a 3.62a 14.55a 62.19b 323.97b
SE 0.13 0.14 0.22 0.04 0.008 0.221 1.222

Abbreviations: CF, crude fiber content; CFat, crude fat content; CPr, crude protein; GE, gross energy content; MC, moisture content; SE, standard error; TA, total ass content; UCa, utilizable carbohydrate.

Regarding effectiveness in treating ailments, most households ranked okra as excellent, while 36% ranked it as very good (Figure 7). This suggests that the plant is efficient in treating a variety of illnesses. It provides the local community with cultural value in addition to healing a variety of ailments.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

The effectiveness of okra in treating human ailments.

3.5. Proximate composition

3.5.1. Moisture content

Table 4 shows the moisture content of two okra cultivars dried by both sun and oven drying methods. Moisture content is the amount of free water present in a given food sample on a wet or dry basis. The moisture content of foods is related to their shelf life. The water content of fresh okra pods varied substantially. To ensure data consistency, the moisture content was estimated on a dry matter basis. The oven and sun‐dried Kenketse had average moisture contents of 2.45% and 6.90%, respectively, whereas Sharma had average moisture contents of 3.69% and 5.24%, respectively (Table 4). Regardless of variant, sun‐dried okra pod samples had significantly (p < .05) higher moisture levels than oven dried okra pod samples. This reveals that sun drying, a traditional practice among local communities, becomes more appropriate for having a higher moisture content that is likely in equilibrium with the environment. The moisture content of oven‐dried samples was 2.45% for Kenketse and 3.69% for Sharma, which is higher compared to the earlier report by Kouassi et al. (2013) for Baoule and Dioula varieties (2.50%). Similarly, the moisture contents of sun‐dried Kenketse (6.90%) and Sharma (5.24%) were lower than those reported for Baoule (7.28%) and Dioula (7.33%) varieties by Kouassi et al. (2013). Furthermore, dried powdered Kenketse and Sharma had a longer shelf life, allowing for longer storage and consumption. Okra is highly perishable due to its quick metabolic activities; hence, it must be dried for prolonged storage and use (El‐Shaieny et al., 2022; Falade & Omojola, 2010).

TABLE 4.

Proximate composition of okra pod by cultivar and drying methods.

Cultivar MC (db%) TA (%) CFat (db%) CPr (db%) CF (db%) UCa (db%) GE (cal.)
Kenketse, Oven 2.45d 8.01a 4.87c 4.06b 14.62b 65.99b 324.08b
Kenketse, Sun 6.90a 6.60b 8.58a 5.23a 15.89a 56.80c 325.31b
Sharma, Oven 3.69c 7.31ab 6.66b 2.18c 12.49d 67.68a 339.36a
Sharma, Sun 5.24b 7.05b 4.92c 2.01c 13.21c 67.58a 322.63b
SE 0.18 0.19 0.31 0.06 0.011 0.31 1.73

Note: Standard error (SE) and means in the same row with different letters are significantly different (p < .05).

Abbreviations: CF, crude fiber content; CFat, crude fat content; CPr, crude protein; GE, gross energy content; MC, moisture content; TAs, total ass content; UCa, utilizable carbohydrate.

3.5.2. Total ash content

Table 4 presents the total ash content of the Kenketse and Sharma pods. The average ash concentrations of oven‐ and sun‐dried Kenketse were 8.01% and 6.60%, respectively, while those of Sharma were 7.31% and 7.05%. The average ash level of both cultivars was higher in oven‐dried okra samples than in their sun‐dried counterparts. The ash content of the oven‐dried Kenketse pod was significantly (p < .05) higher than the sun‐dried versions for both the Kenketse and Sharma cultivars. Oven drying yielded more ash than sun drying, despite the difference in mean moisture content. The mean ash content of oven‐dried Kenkeste and Sharma was 8.01 g/100 g and 7.31 g/100 g, respectively, which is consistent with the levels reported by Adetuyi et al. (2011). Ash represents the inorganic residues in plant biomasses, thus showing the level of mineral residues such as Ca, Mg, K, Na, Fe, Zn, P, and Cl (Odzijewicz et al., 2022; Tiroesele et al., 2013). High mineral content in foods promotes growth and development by catalyzing metabolic processes in the human body.

3.5.3. Crude fat content

The mean crude fat concentrations in pods of both cultivars after drying were 4.87% and 8.58% for oven‐ and sun‐dried Kenketse and 6.66% and 4.92% for oven‐ and sun‐dried Sharma cultivars, respectively (Table 4). The crude fat content of the pods of both okra cultivars differed significantly (p < .05). After sun drying, Kenketse had a greater crude fat level than Sharma, whereas Sharma had a higher crude fat content than Kenketse after oven drying. This demonstrates that the mean crude fat content of pods varied according to the variant and drying technique. The difference is likely due to the proportion of moisture in the final dried specimens that dictates the other constituents. The crude fat content of okra pods for both Kenketse and Sharma was relatively higher than the fat content reported earlier in the literature (Gemede et al., 2015; Kouassi et al., 2013; Nwachukwu et al., 2014). Nonetheless, the mean crude fat content of Kenketse and Sharma was lower than the values reported by Adetuyi et al. (2011). The presence of crude fat concentrations suggests that okra could be used to improve the palatability of foods. There are similar reports from previous studies (Agomuo et al., 2022; Elkhalifa, Alshammari, et al., 2021).

3.5.4. Crude protein content

Kenketse had a significantly (p < .05) higher mean crude protein content than Sharma (Table 4). In Kenketse, sun drying favored the crude protein content, while it was oven drying that improved the crude protein in Sharma. The mean crude protein levels for oven‐ and sun‐dried Kenketse were 4.06% and 5.23%, while those of Sharma were 2.18% and 2.01%, respectively (Table 4). This demonstrates that Kenketse had a higher mean crude protein content than Sharma, regardless of drying procedures. The mean crude protein contents of Kenketse (4.65%) and Sharma (2.10%) pods were considerably lower than the values reported for okra pods in previous reports (Adetuyi & Adelabu, 2011; Gemede et al., 2015; Ogungbenle & Omosola, 2015; Sharma & Prasad, 2010). Nonetheless, the mean crude protein level of Kenketse (4.65%) was comparable with the 4.81% reported for okra pods by Nwachukwu et al. (2014). The disparity between our findings and earlier findings might be attributable to variations in the moisture proportions owing to the different drying techniques as well as differences in cultivars and agro‐ecological conditions. Okra is a good source of protein that can help with protein deficiency among local communities and beyond as a source of plant proteins that are trending in recent days.

3.5.5. Crude fiber content

Regardless of drying procedures, the total crude fiber content of Kenketse and Sharma varied significantly (p < .05). Kenketse had a significantly higher total crude fiber content (p < .05) than Sharma. Moreover, regardless of variants, sun drying yielded significantly higher total fiber content (Table 4). Findings from previous studies also reported variations among different varieties of leaves of fifteen anchote (Coccinia abyssinica) accessions (Gemede et al., 2021). The mean value of crude fiber contents recorded for Kenketse (15.26%) and Sharma (12.85%) was generally higher than previous findings reported in the literature (Adetuyi et al., 2011; Kumar et al., 2013; Nwachukwu et al., 2014). However, the mean fiber content of okra is comparable with the results reported by Hussain et al. (2009). Furthermore, the fiber content is higher than that of many regularly consumed vegetables, including sweet potato leaves (7.20%) (Antia et al., 2006), Allium sativum bulbs (2.13%), and Zingiber officinale rhizomes (2.64%) (Rosc et al., 2018).

This particular finding shows that both okra cultivars could be a good source of dietary fiber, which has a lot of health and nutrition benefits. Nearly half of the okra pod contains soluble fiber in the form of polysaccharides and pectin, which helps lower serum cholesterol and hence the risk of coronary heart disease (Jenkins et al., 2005). The other significant component is the insoluble fiber, which helps to maintain the intestinal tract healthy and reduces irritable bowel syndrome (Yusuf et al., 2022). Moreover, the high fiber content of the okra pod can improve its digestion and absorption processes in the large intestine, stimulating peristalsis and reducing constipation (Gemede et al., 2016).

3.5.6. Utilizable carbohydrate

The mean utilizable carbohydrate content of Sharma was significantly (p < .05) higher than Kenketse (Table 4). Moreover, the utilizable carbohydrate content of oven‐dried Kenketse was significantly (p < .05) higher than its sun‐dried version (Table 4). This shows that oven drying methods, as opposed to sun drying methods, may have a greater effect on the amount of utilizable carbohydrate in okra. On top of that, the utilizable carbohydrate content varied according to variant and drying process. Kenketse and Sharma had mean utilizable carbohydrate contents of 61.395% and 67.63%, respectively, that coincide with the findings of Hussain et al. (2009), which was 62.05%, and Gemede et al. (2015), which ranged from 56.42% to 69.92%. This demonstrates that okra is a good source of carbohydrates for humans and may meet the necessary nutritional value in the human diet.

3.5.7. Gross energy content

The gross energy content of okra pods varied with cultivars and drying techniques (Table 4). In accordance, oven‐dried Kenketse pods had significantly (p < .05) higher gross energy content. Generally, the oven drying method resulted in a slightly higher gross energy content than the sun drying method. This result is consistent with previous studies (Goud et al., 2019; Nwakuba et al., 2020). The mean gross energy content of Kenketse and Sharma was 324 and 330 kcal, respectively, which is higher than the finding reported by Gemede et al. (2015) on eight okra pod accessions that ranged from 257 to 319 kcal and lower than the finding previously reported by Kouassi et al. (2013) of two okra varieties of Bacoule (340 kcal) and Dioula (342 kcal). Variants, drying methods, and agro‐ecological conditions may have contributed to the variations in gross energy content between the findings from the present study and earlier results. The high gross energy value observed in the current study indicates that both cultivars of okra pods could be a rich source of energy, which agrees with results from previous studies (Nwakuba et al., 2020).

Table 5 presents the average proximate composition of okra pods by drying methods. The mean moisture, total ash, crude fat, crude protein, crude fiber, utilizable carbohydrate, and gross energy contents differed significantly (p < .05) depending on drying technique and cultivar type. More precisely, when compared to overdrying, the sun drying technique significantly (p < .05) increased the mean moisture, crude fat, crude protein, and crude fiber levels. Similarly, when compared to sun drying, oven drying significantly (p < .05) increased the mean total ash, utilizable, and gross energy contents (Table 5). This indicates that the cultivar type and drying method have an impact on the proximate composition of okra pods. There are similar results from earlier studies (Goud et al., 2020; Romdhane et al., 2020).

Except for the mean moisture and total ash contents, the proximate composition parameters and gross energy contents vary substantially (p < .05). Kenketse had significantly higher crude fat, crude protein, and crude fiber contents than Sharma (p < .05). Sharma, on the other hand, had significantly (p < .05) higher utilizable carbohydrate and gross energy contents (Table 6). This demonstrates that the mean moisture, total ash, crude fat, crude protein, crude fiber, utilizable carbohydrate, and gross energy contents varied with the cultivar types. This result is supported by findings from previous studies by Gemede et al. (2016) in okra and by Adane et al. (2013) in Taro (Colocasia esculenta L.). The okra pod's proximate composition demonstrates that it is full of nutrients, which are useful components that have the potential to modulate human physiology and reactions (Agregán et al., 2023).

TABLE 6.

Proximate composition (db%) of okra pods by cultivars.

Cultivars MC (db%) TA (%) CFat (db%) CPr (db%) CF (db%) UCa (db%) GE (cal.)
Kenketse 4.67a 7.31a 6.73a 4.65a 15.26a 61.39b 324.70b
Sharma 4.46a 7.18a 5.79b 2.10b 12.85b 67.63a 330.99a
SE 0.13 0.14 0.217 0.04 0.008 0.221 1.222

Abbreviations: CF, crude fiber content; CFat, crude fat content; CPr, crude protein; GE, gross energy content; MC, moisture content; SE, standard error; TA, total ass content; UCa, utilizable carbohydrate.

3.5.8. Morphological characteristics of okra

The morphological characteristics of Kenkeste and Sharma pods (length and width) were significantly different (Table 7). The mean length and width of the Kenketse pod were 70.06 and 29.142 mm, respectively, whereas those of Sharma were 187.078 and 28.041 mm. The mean length and width of Kenketse are comparable to the mean length and width of okra pods recorded by Davies (2020). Sharma pod had a substantially longer mean length than Kenketse. Although there is no significant difference in width, the difference in pod length between the two okra cultivars is substantial (Table 7). Sharma also had a higher length‐to‐width ratio (Figure 8). There are similar reports from previous studies (Abdalla et al., 2023; Davies, 2020). These variations in morphological traits might have an impact on proximate compositions and attributes. Altogether, the proximate compositions and morphological traits of the two okra varieties differ profoundly.

TABLE 7.

Morphological characteristics of pods of okra cultivars.

Cultivar Variable No. of sample Pod
Mean Standard devi.
Kenketse Length 17 70.066 mm (7.06 cm) 4.589
Width 29.142 mm (2.91 cm) 5.079
Sharma Length 17 187.078 mm (18.7 cm) 10.983
Width 28.041 mm (2.8 cm) 3.309
FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Geometric physical characteristics of two okra pods, representing their length (a), width (b), and length‐to‐width ratio (c).

4. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Okra is an underutilized crop grown for its medicinal, nutritional, and economic value, and it is one of the indigenous vegetables in Ethiopia. The results unveiled the relative importance of okra in ethnomedicine, food, and nutrition. The cultivars are widely utilized in traditional medicine, for example, to treat gastrointestinal illnesses, diabetes, constipation, heart discomfort, wounds and cuts, diarrhea, back pain, and amoebae. The entire parts in this regard are utilized to treat various ailments in the research areas. Furthermore, the pods of the two cultivars had a high moisture content and were excellent sources of crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, utilizable carbohydrate, and gross energy, all of which contribute significantly to the enrichment of the human diet. Specifically, Kenketse pods contained a substantially higher quantity of proximate components when compared to the pods of Sharma. In terms of morphological traits, Kenketse and Sharma differed greatly in pod dimensions, with Sharma having significantly longer pod length than Kenketse and Kenketse having significantly wider pod width than Sharma. The variations in the morphological characteristics could account for the variations in their proximate compositions. Collectively, the rich medicinal benefits, food value, and nutritional profile of okra will aid in the diversification of traditional medicine and the monotonous eating habits of the local communities. Therefore, promotion of production and consumption of okra could help alleviate food insecurity and malnutrition among the local communities, thereby helping to realize the full potential of this versatile, and underutilized indigenous vegetable.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors participate in problem identification, data collection, data analysis, as well as write up and revision of the manuscript.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This study was funded by the Office of Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer at Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge the Office of Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer of Hawassa University, Ethiopia, for funding this research.

Mohammed, H. Y. , Teferra, T. F. , & Sime, G. (2024). Indigenous knowledge and nutritional and morphological characterization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moecnh) varieties in Western Ethiopia. Food Science & Nutrition, 12, 2537–2550. 10.1002/fsn3.3936

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All the data used for this study are already included in the manuscript itself.

REFERENCES

  1. Abd El‐Hack, M. E. , Alagawany, M. , Elrys, A. S. , Desoky, E. S. M. , Tolba, H. M. , Elnahal, A. S. , Elnesr, S. S. , & Swelum, A. A. (2018). Effect of forage Moringa oleifera L. (moringa) on animal health and nutrition and its beneficial applications in soil, plants and water purification. Agriculture, 8(9), 145. 10.3390/agriculture8090145 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdalla, A. I. , Mahdi, M. M. , Khiery, N. T. , & Jabir, B. M. O. (2023). Variation and correlation of seed physico‐chemical properties of Sudanese okra lines (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.). International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, 9(1), 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  3. Adane, T. , Shimelis, A. , Negussie, R. , Tilahun, B. , & Haki, G. D. (2013). Effect of processing method on the proximate composition, mineral content, and antinutritional factors of Taro (Colocasia esculenta, L.) growth in Ethiopia. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition, and Development, 13(2), 7383–7398. [Google Scholar]
  4. Adelakun, O. E. , Oyelade, O. J. , Ade‐Omowaye, B. I. O. , Adeyemi, I. A. , & van de Venter, M. (2009). Chemical composition and the antioxidative properties of Nigerian Okra Seed (Abelmoschus esculentus Moench) flour. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 47(6), 1123–1126. 10.1016/j.fct.2009.01.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adetuyi, F. O. , & Adelabu, H. A. (2011). Impact of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) seed flour on nutrients, functional properties and zinc bioavailability of plantain flour. Malaysian journal of nutrition, 17(3), 359–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Adetuyi, F. O. , Osagie, A. U. , & Adekunle, A. T. (2011). Nutrient, antinutrient, mineral, and zinc bioavailability of the okra Abelmoschus esculentus (L) Moench variety. American Journal of Food and Nutrition, 1(2), 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  7. Adiaha, M. S. (2017). Effect of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) on human development and its impact on the economy of farmers in the Obubra Rainforest Zone of Nigeria. World News of Natural Sciences, 10, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  8. Agomuo, J. K. , Nasiru, B. U. , & Ifeka, C. (2022). Effect of different drying methods on the nutritional and sensory attributes of Abelmoschus esculentus (okra). FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 6(3), 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  9. Agregán, R. , Pateiro, M. , Bohrer, B. M. , Shariati, M. A. , Nawaz, A. , Gohari, G. , & Lorenzo, J. M. (2023). Biological activity and development of functional foods fortified with okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 63(23), 6018–6033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Akanbi, W. B. , Togun, A. O. , Adediran, J. A. , & Ilupeju, E. A. O. (2010). Growth, dry matter, and fruit yield components of okra from organic and inorganic sources of nutrients. American‐Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 4(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  11. Alexiades, M. N. (1996). Collecting ethnobotanical data: An introduction to basic concepts and techniques. Advances in economic botany, 10, 53–94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Antia, S. , Akpan, E. J. , Okon, P. A. , & Umoren, I. U. (2006). Nutritive and anti‐nutritive evaluation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) leaves. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 5(2), 166–168. 10.3923/pjn.2006.166.168 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. AOAC . (2000). International methods committee guidelines for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis. Journal of AOAC international, 85(5), 1187–1200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Assen, Y. , Woldearegay, M. , & Haile, A. (2021). An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Kelala District, South Wollo Zone of Amhara Region, Northeastern Ethiopia. Evidence‐based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2021, 1–10. 10.1155/2021/6651922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Benchasri, S. (2012). Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) is a valuable vegetable around the world. Ratarstvo i Povrtarstvo, 49(1), 105–112. 10.5937/ratpov49-1172 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Das, S. , Nandi, G. , & Ghosh, L. K. (2019). Okra and its various applications in drug delivery, food technology, health care, and pharmacological aspects—a review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 11(6), 2139–2147. [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, R. (2020). Some physical properties of okra fruits and seeds. International Journal of Research Studies in Science, Engineering, and Technology, 8(1), 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dias, J. S. , & Ryder, E. (2011). World vegetable industry: production, breeding, and trends. Horticultural Reviews, 38, 299–356. 10.1002/9780470872376.ch8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Elkhalifa, A. E. O. , AlShammari, E. , Adnan, M. , Alcantara, J. C. , Awadelkareem, A. M. , Eltoum, N. E. , Mehmood, K. , Panda, B. P. , & Ashraf, S. A. (2021). Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) as a potential dietary medicine with nutraceutical importance for sustainable health applications. Molecules, 26(3), 696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. El‐Shaieny, A. H. A. , Abd‐Elkarim, N. A. , Taha, E. M. , & Gebril, S. (2022). Biostimulants extend the shelf life and maintain the quality of okra pods. Agriculture, 12(10), 1699. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fadavi, A. , Hassan‐Beygi, S. R. , & Karimi, F. (2013). Moisture dependent physical and mechanical properties of Syrjan region wild pistachio nut. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 15(2), 221–230. [Google Scholar]
  22. Falade, K. O. , & Omojola, B. S. (2010). Effect of processing methods on the physical, chemical, rheological, and sensory properties of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Food and Bioprocess Technology, 3(3), 387–394. 10.1007/s11947-008-0126-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gemede, H. F. , Haki, G. D. , Beyene, F. , Rakshit, S. K. , & Woldegiorgis, A. Z. (2018). Indigenous Ethiopian okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) mucilage: A novel ingredient with functional and antioxidant properties. Food Science & Nutrition, 6(3), 563–571. 10.1002/fsn3.596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gemede, H. F. , Haki, G. D. , Beyene, F. , Woldegiorgis, A. Z. , & Rakshit, S. K. (2016). Proximate, mineral, and antinutrient compositions of indigenous okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) pod accessions: Implications for mineral bioavailability. Food Science & Nutrition, 4(2), 223–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gemede, H. F. , Merga, W. , Dufera, M. , & Serbessa, B. (2021). Nutritional and phenolic profiles of leaves of fifteen anchote (Coccinia abyssinica) accessions. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 7(1), 1911031. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gemede, H. F. , Ratta, N. , Haki, G. D. , Woldegiorgis, A. Z. , & Beyene, F. (2015). Nutritional quality and health benefits of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus): A review. Journal of Food Processing & Technology, 6(458), 100045. 10.4172/2157-7110.1000458 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Goksen, G. , Demir, D. , Dhama, K. , Kumar, M. , Shao, P. , Xie, F. , Echegaray, N. , & Lorenzo, J. M. (2023). Mucilage polysaccharide as a plant secretion: Potential trends in food and biomedical applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 230, 123146. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Goud, M. , Reddy, M. V. V. , Chandramohan, V. P. , & Suresh, S. (2019). A novel indirect solar dryer with inlet fans powered by solar PV panels: Drying kinetics of Capsicum annum and Abelmoschus esculentus with dryer performance. Solar Energy, 194, 871–885. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hussain, J. , Khan, A. L. , Rehman, N. U. , Hamayun, M. , Shah, T. , Nisar, M. , Bano, T. , Shinwari, Z. K. , & Lee, I. J. (2009). Proximate and nutrient analysis of selected vegetable species: A case study of the Karak region, Pakistan. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(12), 2725–2729. 10.5897/AJB09.450 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ismail, M. A. , & Ibn Idriss, E. M. (2013). Mathematical modelling of thin‐layer solar drying of whole okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) pods. International Food Research Journal, 20(4), 1983–1989. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jain, N. , Jain, R. , Jain, V. , & Jain, S. (2012). A review of Abelmoschus esculentus . PHARMACIA, 1(3), 84–89. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jenkins, D. J. A. , Kendall, C. W. C. , Marchie, A. , Faulkner, D. A. , Wong, J. M. W. , de Souza, R. , Emam, A. , Parker, T. L. , Vidgen, E. , Trautwein, E. A. , Lapsley, K. G. , Josse, R. G. , Leiter, L. A. , Singer, W. , & Connelly, P. W. (2005). A direct comparison of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol‐lowering foods with a statin in hypercholesterolemic participants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 81(2), 380–387. 10.1093/ajcn.81.2.380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kouassi, J. B. , Massara, C. , Monde, A. A. , Tiahou, G. G. , Sess, D. E. , & Tia, E. (2013). A comparativestudy of the proximate chemical composition of two varieties of okra dried by two methods: Sun and electric drying. American Journal of BioScience, 1(4), 74–79. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kumar, D. S. , Tony, D. E. , Kumar, A. P. , Kumar, K. A. , Rao, D. B. S. , & Nadendla, R. (2013). A review of Abelmoschus esculentus (Okra). International Research Journal of Pharmaceutical and Applied Sciences (IRJPAS), 3(4), 129–132. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kushi, E. N. , Belachew, T. , & Tamiru, D. (2023). The impacts of okra consumption on the nutritional status of pregnant women in west Ethiopia. Food Science & Nutrition, 11(9), 5554–5556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mohammed, A. M. (2010). The problems of water supply in Asosa Woreda Benishangul Gumuz Regional State by June 2010. Masters thesis, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
  37. Mokgalabone, T. T. , Mpai, S. , & Ndhlala, A. R. (2023). Organic medium‐enclosed trough growing technique improves Abelmoschus esculentus (okra) growth, yield, and some nutritional components. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5645. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ndunguru, J. , & Rajabu, A. C. (2004). Effect of okra mosaic virus disease on the above‐ground morphological yield components of okra in Tanzania. Scientia Horticulturae, 99(3–4), 225–235. 10.1016/S0304-4238(03)00108-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Negash, E. , Belachew, T. , & Tamiru, D. (2023). Understanding the traditional values and use of okra among pregnant women in western Ethiopia: A qualitative study. BMJ Open, 13(4), e071612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nwachukwu, E. C. , Nulit, R. , & Go, R. (2014). Nutritional and biochemical properties of the Malaysian okra variety. Advancement in Medicinal Plant Research, 2(1), 16–19. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nwakuba, N. R. , Chukwuezie, O. C. , Asonye, G. U. , & Asoegwu, S. N. (2020). Influence of process parameters on the energy requirements and dried sliced tomato quality. Engineering Reports, 2(2), e12123. [Google Scholar]
  42. Odzijewicz, J. I. , Wołejko, E. , Wydro, U. , Wasil, M. , & Jabłońska‐Trypuć, A. (2022). Utilization of ashes from biomass combustion. Energies, 15(24), 9653. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ogungbenle, H. , & Omosola, S. M. (2015). The comparative assessment of the nutritive values of dry Nigerian okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) fruit and oil. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering, 5(1), 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  44. Oguntibeju, O. O. , Truter, E. J. , & Esterhuyse, A. J. (2013). The role of fruit and vegetable consumption in human health and disease prevention. Diabetes Mellitus: Insights and Perspectives, 3, 117–126. 10.5772/50109 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Romdhane, M. H. , Chahdoura, H. , Barros, L. , Dias, M. I. , Corrêa, R. C. G. , Morales, P. , Ciudad‐Mulero, M. F. H. , Flamini, G. C. F. R. , Majdoub, H. , & Ferreira, I. C. (2020). Chemical composition, nutritional value, and biological evaluation of Tunisian okra pods (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench). Molecules, 25(20), 4739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rosc, Z. , Lawal, A. R. , Olayinka, B. U. , Murtadha, R. A. , Ayinla, A. , & Etejere, E. O. (2018). Comparative analysis of phytochemical and proximate composition of Allium sativum L. and Zingiber officinale Rosc., Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 26(2), 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  47. Seddig, D. , & Leitgöb, H. (2018). Approximate measurement invariance and longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis: Concept and application with panel data. Survey Research Methods, 12(1), 29–41. 10.18148/srm/2018.v12i1.7210 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sharma, R. K. , & Prasad, K. (2010). Characterisation of promising okra genotypes on the basis of Principal Component Analysis. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 12(1), 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  49. Simonne, E. H. , Stall, W. M. , Olson, S. M. , Webb, S. E. , & Zhang, S. (2010). Okra production in Florida. Vegetable Production Handbook; Horticultural Sciences Department Document HS729 (pp. 157–165). Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. [Google Scholar]
  50. Singh, P. , Chauhan, V. , Tiwari, B. K. , Chauhan, S. S. , Simon, S. , Bilal, S. , & Abidi, A. (2014). An overview on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and it’s importance as a nutritive vegetable in the world. International journal of Pharmacy and Biological sciences, 4(2), 227–233. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tamrat, S. , Tesfaw, M. & Abera, A. (2016). Farmers’ perception on soil erosion and biological soil and water conservation practices. In case of assosa woreda, benshangul gumuz regional state, Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 6(11), 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  52. Tiroesele, B. , Seletlo, B. R. , & Moreki, J. C. (2013). Proximate and mineral analyses of the hawk moth larvae (Agrius convolvuli L.) harvested in Mogonono, Kweneng District, Botswana. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering, and Technology, 2(9), 4926–4931. [Google Scholar]
  53. Uba, G. , Abdulhadi, Y. , Lawan, M. A. , Ahmad, A. , & Kabir, A. (2022). Health risk assessment of heavy metals from selected fruits and vegetables sold in the Dutse ultra‐modern market, Jigawa state. Journal of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Biotechnology, 10(2), 52–55. [Google Scholar]
  54. Uusiku, N. P. , Oelofse, A. , Duodu, K. G. , Bester, M. J. , & Faber, M. (2010). Nutritional value of leafy vegetables in sub‐Saharan Africa and their potential contribution to human health: A review. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 23(6), 499–509. 10.1016/j.jfca.2010.05.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wallace, T. C. , Bailey, R. L. , Blumberg, J. B. , Burton‐Freeman, B. , Chen, C. O. , Crowe‐White, K. M. , Drewnowski, A. , Hooshmand, S. , Johnson, E. , Lewis, R. , Murray, R. , Shapses, S. A. , & Wang, D. D. (2020). Fruits, vegetables, and health: A comprehensive narrative, umbrella review of the science, and recommendations for enhanced public policy to improve intake. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60(13), 2174–2211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introduction to Analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row. https://www.worldcat.org/title/statistics‐an‐introductory‐analysis‐2nd‐ed/oclc/299725866 [Google Scholar]
  57. Yonas, M. , Garedew, W. , & Debela, A. (2014). Multivariate analysis among okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) collections in South‐Western Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 9(2), 43–50. 10.3923/jps.2014.43.50 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yusuf, K. , Saha, S. , & Umar, S. (2022). Health benefits of dietary fiber for the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Biomedicine, 10(6), 1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used for this study are already included in the manuscript itself.


Articles from Food Science & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES