Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):100539. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100539

Table 1.

Overview of the methods implemented for PRS development

Method Required training data sourcea Features Tuning parameters
Single-ancestry

C + T target ancestry model-free pt (p value threshold)
LDpred2 target ancestry Bayesian (spike-and-slab prior) p (causal SNP proportion), h2 (heritability)
EUR C + T EUR model-free pt (p value threshold)
EUR LDpred2 EUR Bayesian (spike-and-slab prior) p (causal SNP proportion), h2 (heritability)

Multi-ancestry

weighted LDpred2 ancestry-specific data from each available ancestry Bayesian (spike-and-slab prior), linear combination strategy p,H2, weight of each ancestry-specific PRS in the final model
PRS-CSx ancestry-specific data from each available ancestry Bayesian (Strawderman-Berger prior), linear combination strategy φ (global shrinkage parameter), weight of each ancestry-specific PRS in the final model
XPASSb ancestry-specific data from each available ancestry Bayesian (bivariate normal prior), infinitesimal model
PolyPred+b ancestry-specific data from each available ancestry Bayesian, functional annotation, linear combination of SBayesR and PolyFun parameters in SBayesR and PolyFun, weight of SBayesR PRS and PolyFun PRS in the final model
CT-SLEB ancestry-specific data from each available ancestry empirical Bayes, EL via SL pt (p value threshold), d (genetic distance) for C + T step, parameters in the SL
MUSSEL ancestry-specific data from each available ancestry Bayesian (multivariate spike-and-slab prior), EL via SL Pr(δ1,,δK),ρk1k2,1k1<k2K, parameters in the SL
a

All methods require three datasets to train the PRS model: (1) discovery GWAS summary data, (2) LD reference data, and (3) tuning data.

b

Results from PolyPred+ and XPASS on all simulated and real datasets (except for PAGE + UKBB + BBJ) were reported in Zhang et al.13