Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 5;110(4):2071–2084. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001119

Table 2.

Radiological response in the FAS and pathological response in the surgery set.

Best responses
Radiological evaluation, n (%) Patients (n=32)
 CR 4 (12.5)
 PR 23 (71.9)
 SD 4 (12.5)
 PD 1 (3.1)
 ORR 27 (84.4, 68.3–93.1%)
 DCR 31 (96.9, 84.3–99.5%)
Pathological evaluation, n (%) Patients (n=29)
Pathology T-stage
 ypT0 5 (17.2)
 ypT1 5 (17.2)
 ypT2 4 (13.8)
 ypT3 10 (34.5)
 ypT4 3 (10.3)
 ypTx 2 (6.9)
 Downing T 23 (79.3)
Pathology N-stage
 ypN0 16 (55.2)
 ypN1 7 (24.1)
 ypN2 4 (13.8)
 ypN3 2 (6.9)
 Downing N 21 (72.4)
Nerve invasion
 0 17 (58.6)
 1 8 (27.6)
 Unknown 4 (13.8)
Vessel invasion
 0 14 (48.3)
 1 11 (37.9)
 Unknown 4 (13.8)
Pathological regression (as per the Mandard criteria)
 TRG0 (pCR rate) 5 (17.2)
 TRG1 11 (37.9)
 TRG2 10 (34.5)
 TRG3 3 (10.3)
 MPR rate 16 (55.2)
TNM stage after operation
 ypT0N0 5 (17.2)
 Stage I 8 (27.6)
 Stage II 11 (37.9)
 Stage III 5 (17.2)

Data are presented as n (%) or n (%, 95% CI).

CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; FAS, full analysis set; MPR, major pathological response; ORR, overall response rate; pCR, pathological complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TNM, tumour/node/metastases; TRG, tumour regression grading.