Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 16;28:123. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04911-5

Table 4.

Predictive factors of failure in attaining aggressive beta-lactam PK/PD targets in critically ill patients

Risk factor Studies No. of patients (aggressive vs. conservative PK/PD targets) Odds ratio (95% CI) Heterogeneity (I2; p value) Publication bias (p value Egger’s test) Log estimate Point score
Age 4 598 vs. 1001

1.00

(0.98–1.02)

p = 0.95

49.8%

p = 0.11

0.63 NA 0
Male gender 3 582 vs. 965

0.34

(0.25–0.48)

p < 0.001

0.0%

p = 0.38

0.06 -1.08 1
BMI > 30 kg/m2 3 582 vs. 965

0.92

(0.85–0.99)

p = 0.032

0.0%

p = 0.76

0.18 -0.08 1
eGFR 4 224 vs. 298

0.98

(0.95–1.00)

p = 0.07

79.8%

p = 0.002

0.05 NA 0
Prolonged infusion 2 331 vs. 220

7.54

(4.49–12.68)

p < 0.001

0.0%

p = 0.56

NA 2.02 − 2
Daily dose 3 590 vs. 880

1.09

(0.92–1.30)

p = 0.32

54.6%

p = 0.11

0.50 NA 0
Augmented renal clearance 2 151 vs. 28

9.02

(2.97–27.39)

p < 0.001

0.0%

p = 0.81

NA 2.20 2
SOFA 2 193 vs. 205

0.82

(0.43–1.59)

p = 0.56

34.7%

p = 0.22

NA NA 0
MIC value above the clinical breakpoint 2 151 vs. 28

18.47

(1.22–278.86)

p = 0.035

71.5%

p = 0.06

NA 2.92 2

BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, NA not applicable, PK/PD pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment