Table 1.
Included Studies and Representation of Athletes Evaluated a
| Study | Study Type | Athletes, n | Mean Age, Years (Range) | Rodeo Events Recorded, n | Female Athletes | Data Collection Method | Dates of Injuries | Location | Level of Rodeo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandenburg and Archer 2 | Retrosp | 81 | 20 (7-52) | 1 | No | Survey | Jun 5, 1995, to Jul 19, 1999 | Oklahoma, USA | Pro, nonpro |
| Brandenburg et al 4 | Retrosp | 34 | Median, 18 (9-33) | 1 | No | Chart review | 1992-1996 | Oklahoma, USA | NR |
| Butterwick et al 6 | Prosp | 323 | NR | 6 | No | Voluntary assessment | 1995-1999 | Canada | Pro |
| Butterwick et al 7 | Retrosp, prosp | 49 | 22 (9-49) | 10 | Yes | Chart review, survey | 1989-2009 | Canada and USA | NR |
| Butterwick and Meeuwisse 8 | Prosp | NR | 18-28 | 1 | Yes | Voluntary assessment | 1995-1999 | Canada | Pro |
| Butterwick and Meeuwisse 9 | Prosp | NR | NR | 6 | Yes | Voluntary assessment | 1995-1999 | Canada | Pro |
| Butterwick et al 11 | Prosp | NR | NR | 5 | No | Voluntary assessment | 1994-1995 | Canada | Pro |
| CDC 12 b | Retrosp | 5 | 28, 14, 26, 15, 17 | 1 | No | Chart review | 1994-1995 | Louisiana, USA | NR |
| Crichlow et al 14 | Retrosp | 169 | 25 (17-59) | 8 | Yes | On-site survey | 2004 | California, USA | Pro |
| Figueiredo et al 20 | Retrosp | 13 | 23.2 ± 4.4 (18-31) | 1 | No | Chart review | Apr 2010-Feb 2012 | Brazil | NR |
| Forrester 21 | Retrosp | 408 | 13-19 | NR | Yes (15.3%) | Chart review | 2000-2019 | USA | Adolesc |
| Ketai et al 30 | Retrosp | 39 | 27 ± 8.4 | NR | Yes | Chart review | 1990-1005 | New Mexico, USA | NR |
| Lau et al 34 | Retrosp | 9 | 35 ± 7 (30-51) | 1 | No | Chart review | 1992-2008 | Canada | NR |
| Livingston et al 36 | Retrosp | 38 | 21.3 ± 6.13 (12-47) | 1 | NR | Chart review | Nov 2004-Nov 2010 | Australia | NR |
| Meyers et al 43 | Retrosp | 25 | 21 ± 1.4 | 2 | No | Voluntary assessment | NR | USA | College |
| Miller et al 45 | Prosp | 19 | NR | 6 | Yes | Online survey | NR | USA | NR |
| Moneim et al 46 | Retrosp | 19 | 30 (11-50) | 1 | Yes (26.3%) | Chart review | 1983-2002 | New Mexico, USA | NR |
| Ross et al 54 | Retrosp | 189 | 18-36 | 3 | No | Mailed survey | Jan 2004-Jun 2006 | USA | Pro, college |
| Sinclair and Smidt 60 | Retrosp | 334 | NR | 11 | Yes | On-site injury surveillance | 1996-2005 | USA, Canada, Australia | High school |
| Sinclair Elder et al 61 | Retrosp | NR | NR | 6 | No | Chart review | 2011-2014 | USA, Canada, Brazil, Australia | Pro |
| Sinclair Elder and Tincknell 62 | Retrosp | 82 | NR | 6 | No | Chart review | 2011-2014 | USA, Canada, Brazil, Australia | Pro |
| Slawski and West 63 | Retrosp | 5 | 23 (18-32) | 1 | No | Chart review | 1995-1996 | Missouri, USA | NR |
| Watts et al 66 | Retrosp | 264 | NR | 9 | Yes | Chart review | 2016-2017 | USA | College |
a
adolesc, adolescent; nonpro, nonprofessional; NR, not reported; Pro, professional; Prosp, prospective; Retrosp, retrospective.
b
CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.