Coovadia 2010.
Methods | Randomized open label trial | |
Participants | 323 children less than 2 years old previously exposed to NNRTI, median age 20 months (IQR 10‐36) in the control and 19 (IQR 9‐43) months in the switch group. Inclusion criteria: met clinical and immunological criteria for treatment initiation (WHO 2006), exposed to NVP and started on PI‐based regimen; achieved and sustained less than 400 copies/ml for at least 3 months within the first 12 months of treatment Exclusion criteria: children receiving tuberculosis treatment, having abnormalities in ALT greater than grade 2 (grading from Division of AIDS guidelines) and needing acute treatment for opportunistic infections (except TB) or tumours |
|
Interventions | Control: continuous PI based ART Intervention: switch to NVP based ART |
|
Outcomes | Mortality; Any viral load >50 copies/ml; Confirmed viral load >1000 copies/ml; Change in CD4%; Change in weight and height Z scores; Adverse events | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | quote:" Randomization was done in cohort blocks of variable size between 8 and 12. Allocations were generated by the study statistician" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote from trial manuscript: "Allocations were concealed in opaque envelopes opened on site at the time of randomisation" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | None, but outcomes are unlikely to be biased by unmasking |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | None, but outcome measurements are unlikely to be biased by unmasking |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | quote: "Modified intent‐to‐treat analyses were conducted excluding those children (n = 3) missing virologic outcome data" Missing data were reported in detail |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol available in the public domain, risk of selective reporting is very unlikely |
Other bias | Low risk |