Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Feb 20;42(7):892–904. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.006

Table 4.

Step 3: Weighted model scores

Model Mean ± SD Score range OR (95% CI) per point increase in score AUC (95% CI)
LT-FS-Base 19.2 ± 8.2 10 – 36.0 1.11 (1.06, 1.16) 0.73 (0.66, 0.81)
LT-FS-Body Composition 20.5 ± 8.9 10 – 42.4 1.11 (1.06, 1.15) 0.74 (0.66, 0.82)
LT-FS-Biomarker 24.6 ± 10.7 10 – 60.3 1.11 (1.07, 1.15) 0.78 (0.69, 0.86)
Model Mean ± SD Score range OR (95% CI) per point increase in score AUC (95% CI)
SPPB 9.3 ± 3.1 0 – 12 1.08 (0.98, 1.19) 0.58 (0.48, 0.67)
FFP 1.9 ± 1.2 0 – 5 1.12 (0.82, 1.53) 0.55 (0.44, 0.66)

Each variable in Step 2 models were multiplied by their parameter estimates estimated by logistic regression and combined to create an index score range. This table demonstrates the performance characteristic of each model score (e.g., mean scores, ranges, score associations with death and delisting by linear regression, and model area under the curves (AUC) for waitlist death and delisting. The same characteristics of the existing SPPB and FFP measures are presented for comparison. See http://lungtransplantfrailtyscale.ucsf.edu for an online calculator