Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;2022:9310710. doi: 10.1155/2022/9310710

Table 3.

Summary of LIT and HIT training interventions included within each review, training prescription, and evaluation.

Author Mode Duration (weeks) Frequency (times per week) Intensity (as reported in reviews) VO2max
MICT
Huang et al. [19] Walking (80%), jogging, cycling, stair-climbing, aerobic dance, tai chi, outdoor and aerobic games. 38.1 ± 10 Total = 3.3 ± 0.7 MICT: HRmax (n = 19, 60–85% (73.3 ± 6.2%)), VO2max (n = 10, 50–82% (63.5 ± 10.4%)), HRR (n = 28, 35–80% (62.0 ± 13.1%)), HRmax (n = 10, 107–129 bpm 119.8 ± 7.5 bpm)) MICT: (mean ± SEM, 3.50 ± 0.84 mL.kg.min−1; 95% CI: 1.83–5.17; p < 0.001), CON: (0.27 ± 0.91 mL.kg.min−1; 95% CI: –2.08 to 1.54; p=0.769 )

HIIT
Wen et al. [20] Cycling (n = 21) Handcycling (n = 1) Running (n = 10) Walking (n = 1) Swimming (n = 1) Rowing (n = 2) 6.62 ± 3.46 Total = 3.17 ± 0.94 HIIT: vVO2max (n = 3, 100–110%), All out (n = 11), pVO2max (n = 3, 100–125%), VO2max (n = 6, 80–120%), VO2peak (n = 1, 90%), Wmax (n = 2, 80-90%), LT (n = 1, 120–140%), HRR (n = 2, 80-90%), HRmax (n = 3, 85–97.5%), maximal effort (n = 2), near maximal (n = 1), PPO (n = 1, 175%). MICT: GET (n = 1, 90%), VO2max (n = 6, 60–70%), VO2peak (n = 3, 65%), LT (n = 1, 80-95%), HRR (n = 2, 50–55%), HRmax (n = 4, 65–80%), pVO2wmax (n = 1, 65%). EX-CON: 13 km/hr (n = 1), HRmax (n = 1, 70%), VO2max (n = 1, 80%), vVO2peak (n = 1, 50%) Healthy: HIIT vs. CON: large effect (SMD = 5.45 mL.kg.min−1; SMD = 1.81, 95% CI 1.39–2.22, p < 0.05). HIIT vs. MICT: moderate effect (SMD = 2.06 mL.kg.min−1; SMD = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.23–1.05, p < 0.05). Athletic: HIIT vs. CON: small effect (SMD = 1.71 mL.kg.min−1; SMD = 0.57, 95% CI 0.13–1.01, p < 0.05)

Montero et al. [21] Walking (n = 7) Running (n = 7) Cycling (n = 13) Rowing (n = 4) 23.95 ± 17.85 Total = 2.56 ± 0.88 HIIT: HRmax (n = 9, 70–90%), VO2max (n = 5, 60–80%), Wmax (n = 2, 90–100 %), HRR (n = 1, 80%). MICT: not reported MICT vs. HIIT: SMD: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.25), p < 0.0001. MICT: SMD: 0.79 (95% CI: 0.41, 1.17), p < 0.0001

Scribbans et al. [22] Cycle (n = 26) Running (n = 13) Ball dribbling (n = 1) Snowshoeing (n = 1) T1 = 6 ± 0.3 T2 = 6.9 ± 0.4 T3 = 6.2 ± 0.3 T1 = 3.7 ± 0.3 T2 = 3.2 ± 0.2 T3 = 3.1 ± 0.2 MICT: T1 = 68(60–70% VO2max). HIIT: T2 = 87(80–92.5% VO2max), T3 = 167(100–250% VO2max) T1: Pre = 3.2 ± 0.2 (L.min−1), Post = 3.5 ± 0.2 (0.29 ± 0.15, ES = 0.77). T2: Pre = 3.8 ± 0.2, Post = 4.1 ± 0.2 (0.26 ± 0.10, ES = 0.68). T3: Pre = 3.2 ± 0.2, Post = 3.5 ± 0.2 (0.35 ± 0.17, ES = 0.80)
Milanović et al. [23] Not reported HIIT = 8.86 ± 5.01 END = 9.62 ± 5.43 HIIT = 3.2 ± 2.98 END = 3.32 ± 2.87 HIIT: all out (n = 6), HRmax (n = 4, 90–100%), HRR (n = 1, 100%), VO2max (n = 7, 80–170%), Pmax (n = 1, 125%), pVO2max (n = 1, 80%), MAS (n = 1, 105–110%), vVO2max (n = 2, 75–130%), pVO2max (n = 1, 80%), WRmax (n = 1, 120%), LT (n = 1, 120–140%). MICT: HRmax (n = 6, 60-80%), HRR (n = 2, 75–85%), VO2max (n = 9, 60–70%), VO2peak (n = 4, 65%), vVO2max (n = 1, 75%), VLT (n = 1, 75–85%), LT (n = 1, 80–85%) HIIT: 5.5 ± 1.2 mL.kg.min−1. MICT: 4.9 ± 1.4 2 mL.kg.min−1

Montero et al. [24] Cycle ergometer (n = 7) Treadmill (n = 6) 5–12.9 Total = 1.17-4.41 HIIT: Wmax (n = 1, 50–75%), HRmax (n = 7, 70–100%), VO2max (n = 5, 60–95%). MICT: not reported MICT: SMD: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.23–1.05, p=0.002. HIIT: SMD: 0.87 (CI: 0.22–1.51), p=0.008

Weston et al. [14] Wingate cycling HIIT = 5.3 ± 2.25 END = 4.9 ± 2.1 EX-CON = 4.4 ± 2.7 HIIT = 2.8 ± 0.5 MICT = 3.4 ± 1.1 EX-CON = 4 HIIT: VO2max (n = 3, 95–130%), Vmax (n = 1, 93%), Pmax (n = 8, 90–175%), all out (n = 23). MICT: VO2max (n = 5, 65–80%), GET (n = 1, 90%), Pmax (n = 1, 60–70%), HRmax (n = 1, 70–80%). EX-CON: vVO2max (n = 1, 75%) HIIT: 6.2%, ±3.1 (90% CI). MICT vs. HIIT: −1.6% ±4.3. EX-CON: 1.2% ±2.0

Bacon et al. [25] Running Cycling 6–12 Not reported HIIT: not reported MICT: 30–48 min/day at 64.3 ± 3.7% VO2max HIIT: Random effects model: 0.51 L.min−1 (95% CI: 0.43–0.60, p=0.001 ). SMD = 0.86 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.99). MICT: not reported

SIT
Gist et al. [26] Cycling (n = 10) Running (n = 7) 4.8 ± 2.3 Total = 2.9 ± 0.4 SIT: All out (n = 13), Maximal (n = 1), PPO (n = 1, 175%), VO2max (n = 1, 130%). EX-CON: VO2max (n = 6, 65-80%), HRmax (n = 1, 70–80%), GET (n = 1, 90%), NA (n = 7), Moderate (n = 1), Low-moderate (n = 1) SIT: -2.43-11.84% (Cohen's d = 0.32, 95% CI : 0.10–0.55; z = 2.79, p < 0.01). SIT vs. MICT: 2.17–13.49% (Cohen's d = 0.04, 95% CI : −0.17 to 0.24; z = 0.36, p=0.72 ). SIT vs. EX-CON: Cohen's d = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.46–0.93; z = 5.84, p < 0.01)
Sloth et al. [15] Wingate tests (n = 18) Treadmill (n = 1) 4.46 ± 2.3 Total = 3 SIT: all out: 30 seconds (n = 9), 10–15 seconds (n = 3). MICT: not reported SIT: Range: 4.2–13.4%. Mean: 8.54 ± 3.05%. SMD: 0.63, 95% CI: (0.39–0.87)

HIIT and SIT
Maturana et al. [27] Cycling (n = 20) running (n = 5) 8.76 ± 9.03 HIIT = 3.08 ± 0.28 SIT = 3.07 ± 0.27 MICT = 3.32 ± 0.69 HIIT: VO2max (n = 6, 75–101%), PPO (n = 1, 100%), ∆LT (n = 1, 35–75%). SIT: maximal at resistance % BM (n = 9, 7.5%), %BM (n = 2, 5%), VO2max (n = 2, 100–170%), HRmax (n = 1, 90–95%) MICT: VO2max (n = 17, 50–70%), LT (n = 2, 90–95%), HRR (n = 2, 50–60%), HRmax (n = 3, 64–80%) HIIE vs. MICT: small effect (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.04–0.48, p=0.022)

HIIT: high-intensity interval training; CON: nonexercise control; MICT: moderate-intensity continuous training; EX-CON: exercising control; SIT: sprint interval training; VO2max: maximal oxygen uptake; T1: 60–70% VO2max; T2: 80–92.5% VO2max; T3: 100–250% VO2max; HRmax: maximal heart rate; HRR: heart rate reserve; Vmax: maximal velocity at VO2max; vVO2max : velocity at VO2max; Pmax: peak watt work load; GET: gas exchange threshold; pVO2max: maximal aerobic power; MAS: maximal aerobic speed; WRmax: work rate at VO2max; ∆LT: change between lactate threshold VO2max; VO2peak: peak oxygen uptake; VLT: velocity at lactate threshold; Wmax: maximal power output; PPO: peak power output; maximal at resistance of %BM: 30 second all-out effort relative to % body mass; and HIIE: combination of HIIT and SIT training effects on VO2max