Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 18;2023:9507977. doi: 10.1155/2023/9507977

Table 1.

General description of the studies.

Study ADV investigated and duration and frequency of the program Muscle hypertrophy assessment Main results for TRAD Main results for ADV Differences between protocols
Amirthalingam 2017 GVT. 6 weeks of training performed 3 days per week. Lean mass through DEXA and MT through B-mode ultrasonography ↑3.1, ↑4.2, and ↑7.8% in total, trunk, and arm lean mass, respectively. No significant changes in MT. ↑1.9, ↑1.0, and ↑3.5% in total, trunk, and arm lean mass, respectively. No significant changes in MT. No significant differences between GVT and TRAD

Angleri 2017 CP and DS. 10 weeks of training performed 2 days per week. ACSA through B-mode ultrasonography ↑7.6% in ACSA ↑7.5% and ↑7.8% in ACSA induced by CP and DS, respectively No significant differences between CP, DS, and TRAD

Branderburg 2002 EO. The training was performed 2 days per week for the first 2 weeks and then 3 days per week for the remainder of the 9-week training period. ACSA through magnetic resonance imaging No significant changes No significant changes No significant differences between EO and TRAD

Enes 2021 DS and RP. 8 weeks of training performed 2 days per week. MT through B-mode ultrasonography ↑14.2 and ↑6.5% in the proximal thigh and middle thigh MT, respectively. No significant changes in distal thigh MT. ↑11.6 and ↑7.7% in the proximal thigh and middle thigh MT, respectively, for DS. ↑8.8 and ↑5.1% in the proximal thigh and middle thigh MT for RP. No significant changes in distal MT for both groups. No significant differences between DS, RP, and TRAD

Fisher 2014 PE. 12 weeks of training performed 2 days per week. Lean mass through air displacement plethysmography No significant changes No significant changes No significant differences between PE and TRAD

Fisher 2016 A SS and EO. 10 weeks of training performed 2 days per week. Lean mass through air displacement plethysmography No significant changes No significant changes No significant differences between SS, EO, and TRAD

Fisher 2016 B DS and HDS. 12 weeks of training performed 2 days per week. Lean mass through air displacement plethysmography No significant changes No significant changes No significant differences between DS, HDS, and TRAD

Hackett 2018 GVT. 12 weeks of training performed 3 days per week. Lean mass through DEXA No significant changes No significant changes No significant differences between GVT and TRAD

Prestes 2019 RP. 6 weeks of training performed 4 days per week. MT through B-mode ultrasonography No significant changes ↑11% in thigh MT ↑ in thigh MT was greater for RP

Walker 2016 EO. 10 weeks of training performed 2 days per week. MT through B-mode ultrasonography and lean mass through DEXA ↑11 and ↑16% in vastus lateralis and medialis MT, respectively. No significant changes in lean mass. ↑13 and ↑11% in vastus lateralis and medialis MT, respectively. No significant changes in lean mass. No significant differences between EO and TRAD

The table shows resistance training programs investigated, muscle hypertrophy assessments, and main results. GVT: German volume training; MT: muscle thickness; DEXA: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; CP: crescent pyramid; DS: drop-set; ACSA: anatomical cross-sectional area; EO: eccentric overload; RP: rest-pause; PE: pre-exhaustion; SS: super slow; HDS: heavy DS;  = data not used in calculation of standardized mean difference due to incomplete report; ↑ = increase.