Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 17;137(5):107. doi: 10.1007/s00122-024-04609-w

Table 2.

QTLs for canopy wilting that were identified by composite interval mapping (CIM) for the Hutcheson × PI 471938 RIL population in the combined environments

QTL name Chra Peak marker Pos (cM)b CI (cM)c Pos (bp)d CI (bp)e LODf Additive Effectg R2 Source of favorable Allele
qWilt_Gm2 2 Gm02_15067760_G_A 114.8 102.5–127.7 15,271,225 14,220,378–18913725 3.9 1.00 0.11 PI 471938
qWilt_Gm8 8 Gm08_44368268_A_G 162 146.9–167.9 45,403,652 44,267,551–45,913,059 3.6 0.95 0.10 PI 471938
qWilt_Gm9 9 Gm09_36486860_T_C 116.9 105.6–162.7 39,047,264 36,455,035–42790738 3.7 0.98 0.14 PI 471938

aChromosome

bPosition in centiMorgans based on the genetic map

cConfidence interval in centiMorgans which includes all SNPs that met logarithm of the odds (LOD) threshold

dGlyma.Wm82.a2 physical position of the peak SNP marker

eConfidence interval based on Glyma.Wm82.a2 physical positions of all SNPs that met logarithm of the odds (LOD) threshold

fLogarithm of the odds (LOD) of peak SNP marker. The significance LOD threshold (LOD = 3.3) was determined by 1000 permutations, with a significance level of α = 0.05

gAdditive allelic effect