Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 1;23(2):161–170. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0091

Table 1.

Comparison of patient and lesion characteristics between the training and validation cohorts

Variables Training cohort (n = 160) Validation cohort (n = 82) P-value
Age (years) 56 ± 14 60 ± 13 0.0080*
Diameter of breast cancer (mm) 15.9 ± 10.5 18.9 ± 14.9 0.1777
Histological types of breast cancer (n (%)) 0.2985
No specific type 137 (85.6) 74 (90.2)
Invasive lobular carcinoma 10 (6.3) 4 (4.9)
Mucinous carcinoma 12 (7.5) 2 (2.4)
Apocrine carcinoma 1 (0.6) 1 (1.2)
Microinvasive carcinoma 0 (0) 1 (1.2)
Receptor status of breast cancer (n (%))
ER positive 147 (92) 72 (88) 0.3560
negative 13 (8) 10 (12)
PR positive 129 (81) 66 (80) 1.0000
negative 31 (19) 16 (20)
HER2 positive 15 (9) 12 (15) 0.2804
negative 145 (85) 70 (85)
Ki-67 labelling index 19.4 ± 16.3 17.6 ± 13.6 0.4468
Nottingham’s histologic grade (n (%)) 1.0000
1 64 (44) 33 (40)
2 85 (53) 44 (54)
3 11 (7) 5 (6)
Pathological diagnosis of LN metastasis (n (%)) 0.5086
Positive 32 (20) 20 (24)
Negative 128 (80) 62 (76)

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *indicates statistical significance. ER, oestrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor 2; LN, lymph node; PR, progesterone receptor.