Table 1. Comparative Analysis among the Published MOF-Derived and -Synthesized Materials.
| Sr no | materials | specific capacitance (F g–1) | current density (A g–1) | electrolyte | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZIF-derived N-doped porous carbon-ZS | 285.8 | 0.1 | 6.0 M KOH | (58) |
| 2 | RhB@ZIF-8-derived ZnO@C | 1200 | 1.0 | 2.0 M KOH | (27) |
| 3 | ZIF-derived ZnS/CoS | 1646 | 1.0 | 6.0 M KOH | (59) |
| 4 | ZIF-8-derived ZnO/C@f-MWCNT | 650 | 1.0 | 3.0 M KOH | (60) |
| 5 | ZIF-8 derived ZnS@C | 145.7 | 2.0 | 1.0 M Na2SO4 | (61) |
| 6 | ZIF-8 derived N-doped PC-CNTs | 250 | 0.1 | 6.0 M KOH | (62) |
| 7 | HPZIF-67-derived Co3O4@N-doped C | 709 | 1.0 | 2.0 M KOH | (20) |
| 8 | MOF-derived ZnMn2O4/C | 589 | 1.0 | 1.0 M Na2SO4 | (63) |
| 10 | ZIF-8-based carbon@MnO2 | 247.9 | 0.5 | 2.0 M Na2SO4 | (64) |
| 11 | ZIF-67 MOF-derived Mn3O4@ N doped C | 980 | 1 | 2.0 M KOH | this work |