Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Migraine with aura and combined hormonal contraceptives are independently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. However, little is known about whether there are any joint effects of migraine and hormonal contraceptives on risk of stroke.
OBJECTIVE:
We sought to estimate the incidence of stroke in women of reproductive age and examine the association among combined hormonal contraceptive use, migraine type (with or without aura), and ischemic stroke.
STUDY DESIGN:
This study used a nationwide health care claims database and employed a nested case-control study design. Females ages 15-49 years with first-ever stroke during 2006 through 2012 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification inpatient services diagnosis codes. Four controls were matched to each case based on age. Migraine headache with and without aura was identified using inpatient or outpatient diagnosis codes. Current combined hormonal contraceptive use was identified using the National Drug Code from the pharmacy database. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of ischemic stroke by migraine type and combined hormonal contraceptive use.
RESULTS:
From 2006 through 2012, there were 25,887 ischemic strokes among females ages 15-49 years, for a cumulative incidence of 11 strokes/100,000 females. Compared to those with neither migraine nor combined hormonal contraceptive use, the odds ratio of ischemic stroke was highest among those with migraine with aura using combined hormonal contraceptives (odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 3.1–12.1); odds ratios were also elevated for migraine with aura without combined hormonal contraceptive use (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.9–3.7), migraine without aura and combined hormonal contraceptive use (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–2.9), and migraine without aura without combined hormonal contraceptive use (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9–2.7).
CONCLUSION:
The joint effect of combined hormonal contraceptives and migraine with aura was associated with a 6-fold increased risk of ischemic stroke compared with neither risk factor. Use of combined hormonal contraceptives did not substantially further increase risk of ischemic stroke among women with migraine without aura. Determining migraine type is critical in assessing safety of combined hormonal contraceptives among women with migraine.
Keywords: aura, contraception, migraine, stroke
Introduction
Migraine headaches are common among women, with a lifetime incidence of 43%.1 Approximately one third of people with migraine have migraine with aura.2 Aura represents a specific set of neurological symptoms that can include flashes of light, blind spots or lines, tingling pains and numbness, or temporary loss of speech, and generally occurs before the onset of the migraine.3 Women of reproductive age with migraine, particularly those with aura, have an increased risk of ischemic stroke.4-6 The association between migraine without aura and ischemic stroke among women of reproductive age is not as strong and results have been mixed.4-6 The relationship between migraine with aura and stroke is multifactorial and may be related to vascular changes or other underlying mechanisms.1,7 While few studies have reported national incidence rates, ischemic stroke is rare among women of reproductive age (4-9 cases/100,000 per year).8,9 However, stroke is a devastating event and a better understanding of risk factors among women of reproductive age is necessary to address whether there are any joint effects of migraine and hormonal contraceptives on risk of stroke.
Research has shown that women using combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs), containing estrogen and progestin, have an increased risk of ischemic stroke.10 CHCs include combined oral contraceptives (COCs), combined hormonal patch, and combined hormonal ring, and are used by approximately 29% of women currently using contraception in the United States.11 The elevated risk of stroke is likely due to the hypercoagulable effects of estrogen.12 The joint effects of migraine and CHCs on risk of stroke are not well understood. Several studies found that the risk of stroke among women with migraine was increased with use of COCs compared with nonuse.13-16 However, little is known about whether there is additional risk of stroke from COC use or CHC use overall for each migraine type (with or without aura).17,18 Our study sought to estimate the incidence of stroke among women of reproductive age and to examine the joint effects of migraine (with or without aura) and CHCs on the risk of ischemic stroke.
Materials and Methods
Data source
We identified females ages 15-49 years during 2006 through 2012 included in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Research Databases.19 These nationwide health care claims databases from Truven Health Analytics include individual-level health care claims information from employers, health plans, and hospitals. The databases provide information on both outpatient and inpatient health care services and linked information on filled outpatient prescription drug claims. Rigorous quality assessments, including validity and reliability checks, are conducted on these databases.19 Because the data are deidentified, an institutional review board of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined that this was not human subjects research.
Study cohort
We identified all initial cases of inpatient ischemic stroke during 2006 through 2012, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes (433.01, 433.11, 433.21, 433.31, 433.81, 433.91, 434.01, 434.11, 434.91, 436.X) (Figure 1 and Table 1). We excluded women with inpatient or outpatient ischemic stroke codes during 2004 through 2005 to try to limit our analyses to first-ever strokes, as stroke history would likely impact CHC use. Among all females ages 15-49 years during 2006 through 2012, we calculated the cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke/100,000 women, by 5-year age bands. The cumulative incidence was calculated as the proportion of women with ischemic strokes over the total number of eligible women for a given year. We determined the average yearly cumulative incidence by dividing the overall incidence by 7, given that there were 7 years of follow-up (2006 through 2012). Due to the small number of stroke cases and to facilitate comparison between age groups, average yearly cumulative incidence was reported per 100,000 women.
FIGURE 1. Inclusion of cases and controls, 2006 through 2012.
Flow chart of selected cases and controls.
TABLE 1.
Diagnosis and procedure codes
| Condition | Timing | ICD-9-CM | CPT | HCPCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Migraine | During 2004 through 2012; before index date (date of stroke for cases or same date for controls) | |||
| Migraine without aura | 346.1, 346.2, 346.4, 346.7, 346.8, 346.9 | |||
| Migraine with aura | 346.0, 346.3, 346.5, 346.6 | |||
| Ischemic stroke | First ever incidence during 2006 through 2012; excluded women with previous stroke from 2004 through 2006 | 433.01, 433.11, 433.21, 433.31, 433.81, 433.91, 434.01, 434.11, 434.91, 436.X | ||
| Pregnancy | Up to 6 wk before and through index date | V27, V91, 63X.X, 64X.X, 65X.X, 66X.X, 67X.X, 69.X, 72.X, 73.22, 73.59, 73.6, 74.X, 75.X DRG 2006 or before 2006: 370–375, 378, 380, 381 DRG after 2006: 765–768, 770, 774, 775, 777, 779 | 59409, 59612, 59514, 59620, 59840, 59841, 59850, 59851, 59852, 59855, 59856, 59857 | |
| Hysterectomy | Before index date | 68.3–68.9 | 45126, 58956, 58210, 51597, 58954, 58200, 59525, 58953, 58180, 59135, 58951, 58152, 59100, 58573, 58150, 58572, 58571, 51925, 58570, 58554, 58548, 58543, 58542, 58541, 58294, 58293, 58292, 58291, 58290, 58285, 58280, 58275, 58270, 58267, 58263, 58262, 58553, 58552, 58550, 58260, 58240, 58544 | |
| Sterilization | Before index date | V25.2, 66.2–66.3 | 58600, 58605, 58565, 58611, 58615, 58670, 58671, 58579 | A4264 |
| Medical conditions | During 2004 through 2012; 2 outpatient codes or 1 inpatient code before index date | |||
| Hypertension | 401.X–405.X | |||
| Diabetes | 250.X | |||
| Obesity | 278.0X | |||
| Smoking | V15.82, 305.1, 649.0 | 99406, 99407 | ||
| Ischemic heart disease | 410.X–414.X | |||
| Valvular heart disease | 394.X, 395.X, 396.X |
CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; DRG, Diagnosis-Related Group; HCPCS, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System; ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.
Nested case-control analysis
For the nested case-control analysis, we restricted both cases and controls to women continuously enrolled in private insurance from Jan. 1, 2004, to the index date. The date of the first stroke code was defined as the case index date. Controls were women without an inpatient ischemic stroke code from 2006 through 2012. Four controls were randomly assigned for each case and were matched by age in 2006. The index date of the controls was considered to be the same date as their matched case’s index date. Two years of continuous enrollment prior to our study period was required to ensure adequate capture of migraine history and prior strokes. We excluded women with pregnancy codes within 6 weeks prior through the index date. We also excluded women with hysterectomy or sterilization from 2004 up until the index date (Table 1 and Figure 1).
Migraine headaches with and without aura were identified using inpatient or outpatient ICD-9-CM codes during 2004 until the index date (migraine with aura: 346.0, 346.3, 346.5, 346.6; migraine without aura: 346.1, 346.2, 346.4, 346.7, 346.8, 346.9) (Table 1). If a woman had codes for both migraine types (with and without aura), she was classified as having migraines with aura. To ensure that we captured migraine status before the stroke date, cases and controls were classified as having migraines only if the migraine codes occurred prior to the index date.
Current CHC use was identified using the National Drug Codes from the MarketScan pharmaceutical database. Current CHC use was defined as a filled prescription for COCs, patch, or ring within 90 days prior to the index date. All CHCs were grouped together; analyses were additionally conducted including only COC use but numbers of women using the patch or ring were too small for separate analyses.
We examined other risk factors for ischemic stroke, including personal characteristics (age, obesity, and smoking) and medical conditions (diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and valvular heart disease) (Table 1). Smoking and obesity were identified by any outpatient or inpatient code before the index date. Smoking codes included a history of tobacco use, tobacco abuse, or smoking cessation counseling. Diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and valvular heart disease were determined by either an inpatient or outpatient code before the index date. Women were defined as having these conditions if there was 1 inpatient code or 2 outpatient services codes at least 30 days apart. We considered inpatient diagnosis to be valid because these diagnosis codes are assigned at the time of hospital discharge and therefore likely to represent confirmed diagnoses. We required 2 outpatient codes at least 30 days apart to increase accuracy of outpatient diagnoses and exclude women who were tested but ultimately ruled out for the medical condition.
Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of ischemic stroke associated with stroke risk factors of interest (migraine status and current CHC use), with age as a conditioning variable and adjusting for hypertension, diabetes, obesity, ischemic heart disease, and valvular heart disease. To determine joint effects of migraines and CHC use, we conducted conditional logistic regression to calculate aOR and 95% CI for OR of stroke by migraine type and CHC use. Software (SAS 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analysis.
Results
Stroke incidence
During 2006 through 2012, there were 25,887 ischemic strokes among 33,218,977 females ages 15-49 years in the MarketScan databases. The overall average yearly cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke was 11 strokes/100,000 women. The average yearly cumulative incidence increased with increasing 5-year age band (1/100,000 females among ages 15-19 years and 30/100,000 females among ages 45-49 years) (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2. Average yearly cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke, 2006 through 2012.
Graph of ischemic stroke incidence among women of reproductive age by 5-year age group.
Nested case-control study
Women with migraine with aura had an increased OR of ischemic stroke compared with no migraines (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.2–3.9) (Table 2). Women with migraine without aura also had an increased OR of ischemic stroke compared with no migraines, but of less magnitude than for migraine with aura (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.8–2.5). Women currently using CHCs had a slight but significantly increased OR of ischemic stroke compared with never or former users (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.6). The OR of ischemic stroke was also elevated among women with obesity, smoking, and medical conditions studied compared with women without the specific condition, with the highest OR among women with ischemic heart disease (aOR, 5.5; 95% CI, 4.0–7.6).
TABLE 2.
Characteristics of cases and controls and odds ratios of ischemic stroke among females ages 15-49 years, MarketScan databases, 2006 through 2012
| Characteristic | Cases | Controls | Ischemic stroke Adjusted ORa (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1884 | 7536 | |
| Personal characteristics | |||
| Age,b mean (SD) | 42.0 (7.7) | 42.0 (7.7) | – |
| <35 y | 251 (13.3) | 1004 (13.3) | – |
| ≥35 y | 1633 (86.7) | 6532 (86.7) | – |
| Obesity | 231 (12.3) | 505 (6.7) | 1.30 (1.08–1.58) |
| Smoking | 167 (8.9) | 257 (3.4) | 2.59 (2.05–3.25) |
| History of migrainesc | |||
| Migraine with aura | 93 (4.9) | 146 (1.9) | 2.89 (2.16–3.88) |
| Migraine without aura | 279 (14.8) | 543 (7.2) | 2.08 (1.75–2.48) |
| No migraine | 1512 (80.3) | 6847 (90.9) | 1.0 (reference) |
| CHC use | |||
| Current used | 235 (12.5) | 871 (11.6) | 1.34 (1.13–1.59) |
| Former/never use | 1649 (87.5) | 6665 (88.4) | 1.0 (reference) |
| Medical conditionse | |||
| Hypertension | 707 (37.5) | 1110 (14.7) | 2.63 (2.31–3.01) |
| Diabetes | 320 (17.0) | 340 (4.5) | 2.78 (2.30–3.35) |
| Ischemic heart disease | 164 (8.7) | 69 (0.9) | 5.49 (3.97–7.59) |
| Valvular heart disease | NRf | NRf | 4.99 (1.90–13.12) |
Values are N (%) unless otherwise indicated.
CHC, combined hormonal contraception; CI, confidence interval; NR, not reported; OR, odds ratio.
Derived by conditional logistic regression with age as conditioning variable and adjusted for migraines, current CHC use, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, smoking, ischemic heart disease, and valvular heart disease
At index date
Diagnosis during 2004 through 2012, prior to stroke or index date: presented as 2 categorical variables: (1) any vs no migraine, and (2) migraine with aura, migraine without aura, and no migraine
Combined oral contraceptives, patch, or ring use within 90 d prior to index date
Compared to those without medical condition
NR because of small numbers (<30) per Truven Health Analytics reporting standards–estimates may be unstable.
When examining joint effects and including women with neither migraine nor CHC use as the referent group, we found that the OR of ischemic stroke was highest among women with migraine with aura using CHCs (aOR, 6.1; 95% CI, 3.1–12.1) (Table 3). OR of ischemic stroke was also elevated among women with migraine with aura not using CHCs (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9–3.7), women with migraine without aura using CHCs (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1–2.9), and women with migraine without aura not using CHCs (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.9–2.7). Results were largely unchanged when examining only COC use (results not shown).
TABLE 3.
Odds ratios of ischemic stroke among females ages 15-49 years by history of migraine subtype and combined hormonal contraceptive use
| History of migraines N = 9420 |
Current CHC usea | Cases | Controls | Ischemic stroke Adjusted ORb (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Migraine with aurac | Yes | NRd | NRd | 6.08 (3.07–12.05) |
| No | 74 | 126 | 2.65 (1.91–3.67) | |
| Migraine without aurac | Yes | NRd | 77 | 1.77 (1.09–2.88) |
| No | 255 | 466 | 2.24 (1.86–2.69) | |
| No migraine | Yes | 192 | 774 | 1.39 (1.16–1.67) |
| No | 1320 | 6073 | Reference |
CHC, combined hormonal contraception; CI, confidence interval; NR, not reported; OR, odds ratio.
Combined oral contraceptive, patch, or ring use within 90 d before stroke or index date
Adjusted for hypertension, diabetes, obesity, smoking, ischemic heart disease, and valvular heart disease
Diagnosis during 2004 through 2012, prior to stroke or index date
NR because of small numbers (<30) per Truven Health Analytics reporting standards–estimates may be unstable.
Comment
Our analysis found that the combined effect of migraine with aura and CHC use was associated with a 6-fold increased risk in ischemic stroke compared with women without either risk factor. The combined effect of migraine without aura and CHCs also elevated the risk of ischemic stroke, but to a lesser degree and similar to that among women with migraine without aura not using CHCs.
Similar to previous studies, we found that migraine with aura and use of CHCs were independently associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke.6,10 There are several proposed mechanisms to explain the association between aura and stroke. The migraine may lead directly to stroke due to cortical spreading depression related to the aura (“migrainous infarction”).2 Individuals with auras may have vascular risk factors, such as seen in individuals who smoke or have hypertension, which place them at higher risk of stroke.2 Migraines have also been found in high prevalence among individuals with certain vasculopathies or autoimmune diseases, such as antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus.20 Estrogen has several biological effects including changes in coagulation factors, lipid levels, and blood pressure, which may contribute to the increased risk of stroke.12 It is therefore not surprising that our study found the highest OR of ischemic stroke among women with migraine with aura currently using CHCs.
Although 1 other study also found a significant association between migraine without aura and ischemic stroke, most studies have not found such an association.6 In our study, it is possible some women with migraine with aura may have been misclassified as migraine without aura if they experienced aura in the past but not currently. In addition, our study identified only migraines that received medical attention and therefore likely represented more severe migraines. It is possible that these factors led us to overestimate the association between migraine without aura and stroke. The use of CHCs overall did not impact the relationship between migraine without aura and stroke. Our results suggest the need for further study into the association between migraine without aura and stroke risk and potential interactions with CHC use.
The distinction of migraine type and identification of aura among women with migraine is key when considering contraceptive options. Efforts should be made by health care providers to define migraine type, using criteria to improve diagnosis of migraine types, which may allow for more accurate counseling about contraceptive methods. Our results suggest that CHCs should be avoided among women with migraine with aura. According to the US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, CHCs are a category 4 for women with migraine with aura and should not be used due to safety concerns.21 However, most other contraceptive methods are safe for use among these women, including intrauterine devices and progestin-only methods, and women should be counseled about the range of options.
This analysis has several strengths. The use of a nationwide database comprising millions of individuals allowed for examination of the rare outcome of ischemic stroke. The large sample size allowed us to examine all types of CHCs (COCs, patch, or ring). We were also able to separately examine migraine type. By linking inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy databases over several years, we were able to ensure more complete capture of medical conditions and contraceptive use. This analysis also has several limitations that should be considered. The use of diagnosis codes may be subject to some degree of misclassification and we were unable to validate diagnoses with medical records. However we attempted to minimize misclassification by requiring 2 outpatient codes, which can avoid overdiagnosis of individuals who were evaluated for the condition but ruled out. We were only able to capture migraine headaches that received medical attention. Most individuals with ischemic stroke in the United States likely receive inpatient medical care, however it is possible that we missed first-ever cases of ischemic stroke managed in outpatient or other settings. Use of prescription information to classify contraceptive use may overestimate actual use. Residual confounding may exist for characteristics such as smoking and obesity that may not be fully captured in a claims database. We were unable to examine certain other potential confounding factors, such as race and ethnicity, because these were not available in the database. We did not examine use of anticoagulant medication because information about over-the-counter medications (ie, aspirin) was not available in the database and prescription anticoagulation (ie, warfarin) may be highly correlated with valvular heart disease, therefore leading to collinearity in the models. We excluded prior strokes during 2004 through 2005, however it is possible that we included women who experienced a stroke before the time frame of our study. This may have impacted our results if women with a history of stroke are less likely to be prescribed CHCs, however there would likely be a small effect due to the low incidence in this population. Finally, we only examined women with private commercial insurance and therefore our results are not nationally representative and may not be generalizable to individuals with other or no insurance.
The findings of this study confirm the elevated relative risk of ischemic stroke for women with migraine with aura who also use CHCs: a 6-fold increase over women with neither risk factor in this study population. Women with migraine but without accompanying aura also had an elevated relative risk of ischemic stroke, but OR was similar for CHC users and nonusers, suggesting that CHC use may not be associated with further risk among this population. While overall incidence of stroke among women of reproductive age is low, stroke can be a devastating event and further study is needed to better understand and prevent modifiable risk factors. Accurately distinguishing migraine type and presence or absence of aura is critical for both future investigations and clinical decision-making.
Footnotes
The authors report no conflict of interest. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
References
- 1.Sacco S, Ricci S, Degan D, Carolei A. Migraine in women: the role of hormones and their impact on vascular diseases. J Headache Pain 2012;13:177–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kurth T, Chabriat H, Bousser MG. Migraine and stroke: a complex association with clinical implications. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:92–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33:629–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Etminan M, Takkouche B, Isorna FC, Samii A. Risk of ischemic stroke in people with migraine: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 2005;330:63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schurks M, Rist PM, Bigal ME, Buring JE, Lipton RB, Kurth T. Migraine and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2009;339:b3914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Spector JT, Kahn SR, Jones MR, Jayakumar M, Dalal D, Nazarian S. Migraine headache and ischemic stroke risk: an updated meta-analysis. Am J Med 2010;123:612–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nappi RE, Merki-Feld GS, Terreno E, Pellegrinelli A, Viana M. Hormonal contraception in women with migraine: is progestogen-only contraception a better choice? J Headache Pain 2013;14:66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nightingale AL, Farmer RD. Ischemic stroke in young women: a nested case-control study using the UK General Practice Research Database. Stroke 2004;35:1574–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schwartz SM, Siscovick DS, Longstreth WT Jr, et al. Use of low-dose oral contraceptives and stroke in young women. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:596–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xu Z, Li Y, Tang S, Huang X, Chen T. Current use of oral contraceptives and the risk of first-ever ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Thromb Res 2015;136:52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J, Mosher W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013. Natl Health Stat Report 2015;10:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fazio G, Ferrara F, Barbaro G, et al. Prothombotic effects of contraceptives. Curr Pharm Des 2010;16:3490–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oral contraceptives and stroke in young women. Associated risk factors. JAMA 1975;231:718–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chang CL, Donaghy M, Poulter N. Migraine and stroke in young women: case-control study. The World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception. BMJ 1999;318:13–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lidegaard O. Oral contraceptives, pregnancy and the risk of cerebral thromboembolism: the influence of diabetes, hypertension, migraine and previous thrombotic disease. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:153–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tzourio C, Tehindrazanarivelo A, Iglesias S, et al. Case-control study of migraine and risk of ischaemic stroke in young women. BMJ 1995;310:830–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tepper NK, Whiteman MK, Zapata LB, Marchbanks PA, Curtis KM. Safety of hormonal contraceptives among women with migraine: a systematic review. Contraception 2016;94:630–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kurth T, Winter AC, Eliassen AH, et al. Migraine and risk of cardiovascular disease in women: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2016;353:i2610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hansen LG, Chan S. Health research data for the real world: the MarketScan databases. Bethesda, MD: Truven Health Analytics; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guidetti D, Rota E, Morelli N, Immovilli P. Migraine and stroke: “vascular” comorbidity. Front Neurol 2014;5:193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59:1–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


