Table 3. Association between dietary intake of vitamin C and NAFLD or AHF.
Models | NAFLD | AHF | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95%CI) | P-value | OR (95%CI) | P-value | |
Crude model | ||||
Dietary intake of vitamin C | ||||
Low | Ref. | Ref. | ||
Middle | 0.79 (0.72, 0.87) | <0.0001 | 1.03 (0.84, 1.25) | 0.7935 |
High | 0.70 (0.63, 0.77) | <0.0001 | 0.86 (0.71, 1.06) | 0.1546 |
Adjusted model 1 | ||||
Dietary intake of vitamin C | ||||
Low | Ref. | Ref. | ||
Middle | 0.80 (0.73, 0.89) | <0.0001 | 0.84 (0.67, 1.05) | 0.1183 |
High | 0.70 (0.63, 0.77) | <0.0001 | 0.72 (0.57, 0.91) | 0.005 |
Adjusted model 2 | ||||
Dietary intake of vitamin C | ||||
Low | Ref. | Ref. | ||
Middle | 0.83 (0.75, 0.92) | 0.0003 | 0.83 (0.67, 1.04) | 0.1015 |
High | 0.75 (0.67, 0.83) | <0.0001 | 0.72 (0.57, 0.91) | 0.0052 |
Adjusted model 3 | ||||
Dietary intake of vitamin C | ||||
Low | Ref. | Ref. | ||
Middle | 0.81 (0.73, 0.90) | <0.0001 | 0.83 (0.66, 1.03) | 0.0966 |
High | 0.71 (0.64, 0.80) | <0.0001 | 0.70 (0.55, 0.89) | 0.0032 |
Adjusted model 4 | ||||
Dietary intake of vitamin C | ||||
Low | Ref. | Ref. | ||
Middle | 0.81 (0.73, 0.90) | 0.0002 | 0.79 (0.62, 1.00) | 0.05 |
High | 0.74 (0.66, 0.83) | <0.0001 | 0.69 (0.54, 0.89) | 0.0042 |
Adjusted model 5 | ||||
Dietary intake of vitamin C | ||||
Low | Ref. | Ref. | ||
Middle | 0.82 (0.73, 0.93) | 0.002 | 0.80 (0.62, 1.02) | 0.0668 |
High | 0.78 (0.69, 0.89) | 0.0002 | 0.72 (0.56, 0.93) | 0.0122 |
Crude model was not adjusted
Adjusted model 1 adjusted for age, race, education level, ratio of family income to poverty
Adjusted model 2 adjusted for model 1 + smoking status, work activities status, recreational activities status
Adjusted model 3 adjusted for model 2 + dietary energy intake, dietary protein intake, Dietary alcohol intake
Adjusted model 4 adjusted for model 3 + hypertension status, diabetes status
Adjusted model 5 adjusted for model 4 + uric acid, fasting glucose, glycohemoglobin, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, creatinine