Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 5;15:1369252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369252

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Model 1: A mediation structural model for supportive and non-supportive caregiver responses to a child’s negative emotions. EER, expressive encouragement responses; EFR, emotion-focused responses; PFR, problem-focused responses; MR, Minimizing Responses; PR, Punitive Responses; DR, Distress Responses; T1, Time 1; T2, Time 2; T3, Time 3. Model fit: χ2[104] = 144.84, p = 0.005, CFI = 0.959, TLI = 0.945, RMSEA = 0.033, SRMR = 0.043. Path coefficients a, b, c, and c’ represent unstandardized estimates (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001), with c and c’ indicating the total and direct effects, respectively, while the ab coefficient indicating the indirect effects. Bold lines show statistically significant pathways, and dashed lines indicate non-significant paths. Estimates are statistically adjusted for the child’s gender and race/ethnicity, parent education, and household income. Covariances among variables were not depicted in the figure for simplicity.