Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 18;24:287. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06499-8

Table 1.

Details of the births performed with the CMA intervention

n (%)
Births with CMA intervention 1,430 (100.0)
Onset of labour
Spontaneous onset 1,048 (73.3)
Induction of labour 382 (26.7)
Second stage of labour*
Time second stage (minutes), median (IQR) 102 (57–169)
Missing data 2 (0.1)
Active second stage of labour (minutes) median (IQR) 35 (24–52)
Missing data 40 (2.8)
Choice of Second midwife†
Chosen by the primary midwife 326 (22.8)
First midwife available 481 (33.6)
The second midwife nominated herself 88 (6.2)
Being the midwife in charge (coordinator) 360 (25.2)
Missing data 175 (12.2)
Work experience – primary midwife§‡
< 2 years 485 (33.9)
2–5 years 327 (22.9)
6–20 years 319 (22.3)
> 20 years 293 (20.5)
Missing data 6 (0.4)
Work experience – second midwife†‡
< 2 years 236 (16.5)
2–5 years 262 (18.3)
6–20 years 436 (30.5)
> 20 years 453 (31.7)
Missing data 43 (3.0)
Duration of CMA
Duration of CMA (minutes), median (IQR) 15 (10–20)
< 15 628 (43.9)
≥ 15 710 (49.6)
Missing data 92 (6.4)

* Begins when the cervix is fully dilated and concludes with the birth of the baby

Reported by the second midwife

All midwives could participate as either the primary or second midwife on multiple occasions

§ Reported by the primary midwife