Abstract
A better understanding of the complex interactions between the immune system and tumour cells from different origins has opened the possibility to design novel procedures of antitumoral immunotherapy. One of these novel approaches is based on the use of autologous or allogeneic natural killer (NK) cells to treat cancer. In the last decade, different strategies to activate NK cells and their use in adoptive NK cell-based therapy have been established. Although NK cells are often considered as a uniform cell population, several phenotypic and functionally distinct NK cells subsets exist in healthy individuals, that are differentially affected by ageing or by apparently innocuous viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV). In addition, further alterations in the expression of activating and inhibitory receptors are found in NK cells from cancer patients, likely because of their interaction with tumour cells. Thus, NK cells represent a promising strategy for adoptive immunotherapy of cancer already tested in phase 1/2 clinical trials. However, the existence of NK cell subpopulations expressing different patterns of activating and inhibitory receptors and different functional capacities, that can be found to be altered not only in cancer patients but also in healthy individuals stratified by age or CMV infection, makes necessary a personalized definition of the procedures used in the selection, expansion, and activation of the relevant NK cell subsets to be successfully used in NK cell-based immunotherapy.
Keywords: Cancer, Immunosenescence, NK cell-based immunotherapy, Ageing, NK cells, PIVAC 19
Introduction
Since the discovery of murine and human natural cytotoxicity and natural killer (NK) cells in 1975, evidence supports that they play critical roles in the early control of viral infection and tumour immunosurveillance. In humans, low NK cytotoxicity correlates with increased risk for cancer as it was shown in an 11-year follow-up study [1]. The contribution of NK cells to cancer immunosurveillance is further supported by their role in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) inducing graft-vs-leukaemia effect. NK cells are the first lymphocytes to recover after HSCT [2], and besides their potent effect against leukaemic blasts, they exert a protective role against bacterial and viral infections. NK cells are the first lymphocyte population to reconstitute after HSCT. NK cell numbers usually reconstitute within the first 30 days, and they do not reach full functional competency until 6 months or more, depending on graft composition, immunosuppression, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), or virus infections (in particular, CMV reactivation) [3, 4]. Early and robust NK cell recovery, over 150 cells/µl on day 30 post-HSCT, was associated with improved overall survival and less mortality related to transplantation, whereas low NK cell counts are associated with increased risk of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) reactivation [5]. Selection of donor–recipient mismatches for killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) expressed by donor NK cells, and their ligands, human leukocyte antigens (HLA)-class I molecules, on the recipient, provide allogeneic anti-leukaemia effects that have been proven to be beneficial. Thus, an increase in survival and protection from relapse in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients lacking HLA class I ligands for donor inhibitory KIR has been described in the course of allogeneic HSCT [6, 7].
Ageing is associated with an increased incidence of cancer including haematology malignancies. Indeed, age is the major factor that influences the health status and the immunosuppressed state of patients with cancer and has an impact on the selection of therapeutic procedures [8–10]. The use of older donors has increased consequently to the extension of allogeneic HSCT to older patients. Donor age ≥ 60 years has a significant negative impact on overall survival in patients receiving allografts for haematologic malignancies [11]. However, advanced donor age does not increase the risk of delayed engraftment or major long-term adverse effects [12].
In clinical trials, adoptive transfer of autologous NK cells to treat cancer has shown little benefits despite its lack of side effects [13]. Adoptive transfer of allogeneic NK cells has been demonstrated to be safe to treat solid and haematologic malignancies, and its use is being analysed in several clinical trials [14]. Allogeneic NK cell adoptive immunotherapy benefits from the short persistence of NK cells compared to T cells and their alloreactivity based on KIR-HLA mismatch [15]. In the last decade, different strategies to expand NK cells with high capacity to lyse tumour cells have been used. Harnessing NK cell activation represents a valuable strategy to be considered in cancer immunotherapy.
NK cell biology
Human NK cells are innate lymphoid cells characterized by the expression of CD56 and/or CD16. In peripheral blood, different subsets can be distinguished according to the expression of these markers (Fig. 1). CD56bright CD16− are considered immature cells that produce high levels of cytokines, whereas CD56dim CD16+ subset represents mature NK cells with a high cytotoxic capacity, and CD56−CD16+ are considered a minor subset of dysfunctional NK cells expanded in several clinical conditions [16, 17]. The analysis of NK cells by mass cytometry using 28 markers [18] has shown an unexpectedly high degree of heterogeneity of NK cells and has helped to define two major separate clusters: a less mature cluster characterised by the expression of CD94 and NKG2A and a mature cluster defined by the expression of CD16 and CD57 markers. The development relationship between peripheral blood NK subsets is not fully established with evidence supporting either a linear model or a branched (nonlinear) model of NK cell differentiation (for review [19]).
Fig. 1.
Human NK cell subsets and receptors. a The expression of CD56 and CD16 defines 4 human NK cell subsets. b Human NK cells express a large panel of activating and inhibitory receptors. NK cell activation depends on the balance between inhibitory and activating receptors expressed on NK cell surface that interact with their ligands on tumour cells. The major inhibitory receptors recognize as ligands HLA class I molecules. Several non-HLA class I-specific inhibitory receptors are highly expressed on NK cells (e.g. TIGIT; TIM-3, LAG-3) and may represent checkpoints for NK cell activation. c A representative cytometry of peripheral blood NK cells in a healthy donor is shown
Recognition and killing of target cells depend on a tune balance between NK inhibitory and activating receptors expressed on their surface that interact with their ligands on stressed cells (e.g. viral infected or malignant transformation) [20–22]. Among NK cell receptors, human NK cell function is principally regulated by KIR and NKG2A inhibitory receptors that interact with self HLA class I molecules. These receptors represent the major checkpoints of NK cell activation, although other non-HLA class I-specific inhibitory receptors have been identified on NK cells that also impact the final balance regulating NK cell cytotoxicity [23, 24]. These receptors include the T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), PVR-related Ig domain (PVRIG, also termed as CD112R), lymphocyte-3 activation gene (Lag-3), T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain containing-3 (Tim-3), Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and probably TACTILE (CD96). Activated CD4 and CD8 T cells and a subset of NK cells express Lag-3. In CD4 T cells, Lag-3 binds to Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class II molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), whereas in NK and CD8 T cells, Lag-3 binds to L-SECtin expressed in tumour cells. Tim-3 is expressed on T cells, NK cells, and some APCs and its ligands include soluble ligands (galectin-9 and HMGB1) and cell surface ligands (Ceacam-1 and Phosphatidylserine) [25, 26]. TIGIT, PVRIG and TACTILE inhibitory receptors, together with DNAM-1 activating receptor, are part of an intricate ligand/receptor network. These receptors interact with Nectin and Nectin-like molecules. TIGIT shares both ligands CD112 and CD155 with DNAM-1, TACTILE binds to CD155 and PVRIG to CD112. These ligands are found overexpressed on tumour cells [24–26]. Together with inhibitory receptors specific for HLA class I molecules, KIR and NKG2A, these non-HLA I-specific inhibitory receptors have emerged as novel checkpoints in NK cell activation [23, 24].
Concerning the panel of activating receptors expressed by NK cells that orchestrates NK cell triggering and cytotoxic activity, NKG2D [27], the NCRs (NKp46 [28], NKp30 [29] and NKp44 [30]) and DNAM-1 [31] have been extensively analysed and are considered responsible of NK cell activation against many types of tumours upon interaction with their ligands. MICA/B (NKG2D ligands) and CD112 and CD155 (DNAM-1 ligands) are frequently expressed on tumour cells. We have previously shown that both NKG2D and DNAM-1 ligands are expressed in a high percentage of melanoma cell lines [32] and DNAM-1 ligands are frequently expressed on AML blasts [33]. Other NK cell receptors such as 2B4 (CD244), NKp80, NKG2C and activating isoforms of KIR may also contribute to NK cell activation against tumour cells [22].
NK cell subsets in healthy ageing
Healthy ageing is associated with a remodelling of NK cell subsets with different functional capacities (Fig. 2). Elderly individuals show a decrease in the percentage of CD56bright immature NK cells and an increase in the percentage of CD56dim NK cells expressing the CD57 marker [34]. It is well established that ageing is the major factor affecting the percentage of CD56bright NK cells [35, 36], whereas the expansion of CD56dim CD57+ NK cells is mainly associated with CMV seropositivity not only in old but also in young individuals [35]. According to the linear model of NK cell differentiation (reviewed in [17]), peripheral blood CD56bright NK cells are immature NK cells that can be considered precursors of CD56dim NK cells, that, after activation and maturation can express the differentiation-associated marker CD57. A recent study analysing telomere length and telomerase activity of peripheral blood NK cell subsets supports a linear NK cell differentiation process of NK cells from immature CD56bright to CD56dim NKG2A+ NKG2C−, CD56dim NKG2A− NKG2C−, CD56dim NKG2A− NKG2C+ and late differentiated CD56dim NKG2A− NKG2C+ CD57+ subset [37]. All NK cell subsets presented a reduction in telomere length and telomerase activity with increasing subject age. Of interest, the telomeres of early differentiated NK cells were shorter in the elderly than in young individuals, reaching lengths equivalent to levels found in highly differentiated CD57+ NK cells, considered as approaching senescence in young adults. These results highlight the overall ageing of all lymphocyte populations, including early compartments of lymphocyte differentiation, which may approach telomere-based cellular senescence in the elderly [37]. Thus, the study of NK cell subsets in elderly individuals supports an altered NK cell dynamic, with an age-associated decreased output of new CD56bright NK cells and a maintained or increased percentage of peripheral blood NK cells with markers of long-lived NK cells in the elderly (CD56dim CD57+) [34]. However, if as suggested in recent studies [18], CD56bright NK cells and CD56dim NK cells are distinct lineages, these results indicate that they are differentially affected by ageing and by virus infection. Considering that ageing is associated with a severe decrease in the numbers of CD56bright NK cells, the debate over whether CD56bright NK cells are precursors of CD56dim NK cells or an independent lineage has important implications for novel approaches of NK cell-based immunotherapy in elderly donors.
Fig. 2.
Model of peripheral blood NK cell differentiation in healthy individuals and the effect of CMV. Altered expression of NK activating and inhibitory receptors and decreased NK cell cytotoxicity is often observed in cancer patients. Both ageing and cancer are associated with decreased cytotoxicity. Ageing is associated with decreased telomerase activity and telomere length in all NK cell subsets
NK cells from old individuals show an increased expression of CD57, a marker that defines a subset of mature CD56dim NK cells with cytolytic capacity and cytokine production, but a low proliferative response to cytokines [38, 39]. However, this expansion of CD57+ CD56dim NK cells occurs mainly in HCMV seropositive individuals [38, 40, 41]. Although it has been proposed that HCMV is a major driving force of T and NK cell immunosenescence [42], recent advances support that HCMV infection triggers the maturation of a subset of lymphoid cells (NK, CD8 and CD4) phenotypically characterised by the expression of CD57 and a higher functional capacity to respond to different stimuli [43–46].
Murine NK cells and ageing
Murine NK cells are characterized by the expression of inhibitory receptors (e.g. Ly49A), involved in self-tolerance and licensing, and activating receptors (e.g. Ly49H, NKG2D, NKp46) responsible of triggering NK-mediated cytotoxic function and cytokine production. NK cells derive from lymphoid precursors that acquire these inhibitory and activating receptors and develop their effector functions after interaction with bone marrow stromal cells [47]. Several stages of NK cell maturation have been defined in mice, based on the expression of CD27 and CD11b: immature, CD27+ CD11b−, intermediate, CD27+ CD11b+, and mature, CD27−CD11b+, NK cells [48]. NK cells are essential for resistance to murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) [49] and ectromelia virus, the agent of mousepox [50].
In aged mice, reduced NK cell function is associated with lower numbers of mature NK cells in peripheral tissues and the bone marrow. Ageing-related functional NK cell deficiency, associated with reduced numbers of mature NK cells in mice, has been well documented using different experimental models. This defect results in a decreased response to viral infections resulting in higher mortality. An intrinsic defect in the migration of mature NK cells and an impairment of NK cell migration has been observed in aged mice after influenza [51] or ectromelia virus infection [52]. During influenza infection, aged mice have reduced NK cells infiltrating the lungs and significant reduction of their function [51, 53]. Defective NK cell trafficking has also been involved in age-dependent susceptibility to influenza virus infection due to both lower chemokine and integrin expression and delayed actin polymerization in response to influenza infection [54].
The reduced ability of NK cells from aged mice to produce IFN-γ after stimulation correlates with reduced numbers of mature, CD11b+ CD27− NK cells in peripheral tissues and the bone marrow [51]. This reduced numbers of mature NK cells are the consequence of a defect in their terminal maturation since the percentages of immature NK cells are maintained in the bone marrow from aged mice [55]. Other age-related defects in NK cells, including reduced proliferation, defective maturation and dysregulated expression of activating and inhibitory receptors, a reduced capacity to eliminate tumour cells, and a decreased expression of T-bet and Eomes transcription factors have been defined [56]. The use of young-old mixed bone marrow chimaeras has demonstrated that the aged non-hematopoietic environment is responsible for the impaired maturation and function of NK cells [56]. Similar conclusions were obtained by using an adoptive transfer approach that showed that NK cell from both young and aged mice had a similar response to pathogen and maturation after being co-transferred into young mice, whereas the response and maturation from young mice were decreased after being transferred to aged mice [57]. Bone marrow from young and aged mice gave rise to similar percentages of CD27− mature NK cells in young mixed bone marrow chimeric mice. Although it has been proposed that age-related functional NK cell deficiency was completely reversed by injecting soluble IL-15/IL-15Rα complexes [57], other authors have shown that age-associated defects of NK cells are not restored by IL-15, suggesting that the defect in NK maturation is the consequence, at least in part, of altered maturational cues provided by bone marrow stromal cells [58].
Cytomegalovirus and adaptive “memory” NK cells
In the past decade, cumulative evidence obtained in mice and humans supports that under certain circumstances NK cells can acquire attributes of immunological memory. The generation of “memory” NK cells has introduced an additional degree of complexity in the understanding of NK cells. This term defines a long-lived population of NK cells that possess traits of adaptive immunity, such as clonal expansion, rapid proliferation, high cytotoxicity and cytokine production. In murine models, the discovery that NK cells expressing the Ly49H activating receptor, that interacts with the protein m157 encoded by the MCMV, expand in MCMV-infected mice and, after contraction, the remaining Ly49H+ cells are shown to be long-lived NK cells with the capacity to undergo secondary expansion in response to viral challenge and conferred protective immunity [59–62] supporting their behaviour as “memory” NK cells. An analogous population of NK cells expressing the activating receptor NKG2C expands specifically in response to HCMV [63–65] and HCMV infected individuals have an enhanced response not only to HCMV (HCMV reactivation in HSCT [41]) but also to other viruses such as Hantavirus [66], Chikungunya virus [67], Hepatitis B and C virus [67] or Epstein–Barr virus acute infection [68]. In a recent study, it has been shown that chronic stimulation of adaptive NK cells through NKG2C results in proliferation and activation of CD56dim CD57+ NKG2C+ NK cells but also to the induction of the checkpoint inhibitory receptors LAG-3 and PD-1, resulting in dysfunctional cytotoxic capacity against tumour targets [69]. Thus, although it should be considered that NKG2C+CD57+ represent long-lived, “memory” NK cells in humans, with important implications for NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy, further studies are required to analyse the functional capacity of this NK cell subset, as, at least after in vitro stimulation, they may represent exhausted NK cells with limited cytotoxic activity against tumour cells.
Other murine model analysing the NK cell response to haptens or viruses also support the existence of NK cell memory subsets. Thus, hepatic NK cells expressing the chemokine receptor CXCR6 have been defined as memory NK cells [70]. A potentially similar population of long-lived NK cells expressing CXCR6 and other tissue residency markers that also exhibit recall responses to varicella-zoster virus, has been demonstrated in humans [71]. The observation of high frequencies of liver-resident NK cells expressing CXCR6 and NKG2C and KIR [72], suggest the possibility that the liver might be a site for NK differentiation to NK memory cells.
Taken together, these results support that the marked and persistent changes of NK cells observed in elderly and HCMV seropositive individuals may condition the NK cell response to tumours and the possibility to use these cells in NK cell-based immunotherapy.
NK cells in cancer patients
It can be appreciated significant phenotypic changes on NK cells of patients with cancer that can affect their functionality by reducing their lysis capacity and therefore limit NK cell-mediated tumour control (Fig. 2). In some instances, alterations observed in NK cells in young cancer patients may resemble the phenotype of these cells in elderly donors [8, 9].
Interactions between the repertory of KIRs and MHC class I are complex, as they can lead to a strong inhibition, weak inhibition or activation of NK cells [73]. In patients with leukaemia, it has been notified an increased expression of inhibitory KIR2DL1 (strong inhibition) and a lack of the inhibitory KIR3DL1 (weak inhibition) [74], as well as a lower level of the activating KIR2DS3 [75]. In non-small cell lung cancer, the expression of KIR2DL1, KIR2DL3, KIR2DL4 and KIR3DL1 were correlated with a poor prognosis [76].
We have previously described an altered NK cell phenotype associated with AML characterized by a decreased expression of DNAM-1, NKG2C and NCR receptors, NKp46 and NKp30. Fauriat et al. [77] correlated NKp46 expression with overall survival in AML patients and showed recovery of NK cell function after complete remission. Stringaris et al. [78] also reported downregulation of NKp46, upregulation of NKG2A and low cytotoxic capacity of NK cells from AML patients confirming previous results. Furthermore, in solid cancer such as prostate cancer, there was reported a decreased expression of several activating receptors (CD16, NKp30, NKp46, NKG2D and DNAM-1), and an increase in the inhibitory receptor CD85j [79]. NKG2A expression has been also linked with a poor prognosis in liver cancer [80].
In addition to changes related to cancer, cancer incidence increases with ageing [8, 9]. In elderly AML patients, the effect of age and cancer synergize and the downregulation of these activating receptors in NK cells is even more pronounced [33, 81]. In vivo culture with IL-15 can recover NK cell function in elderly AML patients [82] opening new possibilities for cancer immunotherapy based on autologous NK cells in elderly patients. An interesting aspect is that neither in ageing [83] nor in AML patients the expression of NKG2D seems to be significantly reduced [33]. NKG2D constitutes a major activating receptor in many cancer settings. Its ligands are frequently overexpressed in different types of tumours and consequently, strategies directed to improve NKG2D-mediated recognition of tumour cells should be considered in elderly cancer patients. However, shedding of NKG2D ligands is frequent in haematological cancer and solid tumours and affects NK cell function by blocking NKG2D recognition of its ligands on tumour cells [20, 84] and should be considered when designing strategies based on triggering NKG2D signalling.
AML blast as well as solid tumours such as melanoma express CD112 and CD155, ligands for the activating receptor DNAM-1, that are also recognized by the inhibitory receptors TIGIT (ligands CD112 and CD155) and PVRIG (ligand CD112), Thus, in cancer patients, the activating/inhibitory balance mediated by these paired receptors is threatened due to the downregulation of the activating receptor DNAM-1 and, even more, if the expression of the inhibitory receptors TIGIT and PVRIG is preserved. Further studies are required to establish the role of this axis in tumour control [24].
In addition to their direct cytotoxic capacity, NK cells can contribute to the elimination of tumour cells via antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) in patients treated with anti-tumour-associated antigens (anti-TAA) that interact with CD16, the NK cell receptor for the Fc region of IgG (FcRγIII). The polymorphisms of CD16 have been implicated in the efficacy of anti-TAA mAb-mediated therapy (for review see [85]).
NK cell-based immunotherapies against cancer
As a consequence of the advances in our understanding of NK cell receptors and their ligands, the use of NK cell-based immunotherapy has reached a significance among the new anti-tumour therapeutic strategies. Both, blockade of inhibitory receptors (NK cell checkpoints) or triggering activating receptors have been considered as possible strategies to enhance NK cell cytotoxicity against tumour cells [86]. Besides, the demonstration of the role of allogeneic NK cells in the recognition and killing of AML blasts in HSCT has encouraged development of novel NK cell-based immunotherapeutic strategies for high-risk cancer patients [87] based on the adoptive transfer of autologous or allogeneic NK cells or genetically engineered NK cells, that have already been introduced in phase 1/2 clinical trials.
Enhancement of NK cell function
Due to the importance of NK cells in immunotherapy, different methods have been posed for enhancing NK cell activity toward tumour cells. Here we will briefly discuss some of them (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Enhancement of NK cell cytotoxic capacity for adoptive immunotherapy. Different strategies can be used to enhance the capacity of NK cells to kill tumour cells. Cytokines such as IL-2 and IL-15 are used to activate and expand NK cells in vitro and in vivo. The promotion of ADCC represent a valuable strategy by using mAb targeting tumour antigens (TAA) alone or in combination with low-dose IL-2 or using killer engagers that link CD16 on NK cells to tumour antigens (BiKE), that can also include IL-15 (TRiKE, TetraKE). Checkpoint blockade using mAb directed to HLA class I-specific inhibitory receptors (KIR and NKG2A) and non-HLA class I-specific inhibitory receptors (e.g. TIGIT, PVRIG, TIM-3, LAG-3) can be used to block inhibitory signals and activate NK cells. (PBMC: peripheral blood mononuclear cells, UCB: umbilical cord blood; BM; bone marrow; IPSs: induced pluripotent stem cells)
Combination of cytokines and mAbs against tumour-associated antigens
Interleukins have been used in clinical trials to activate NK cells in vivo although severe adverse effects have been reported when IL-2 is administrated at high doses [88]. IL-15 is increased in the bone marrow of old individuals [89]. IL-15 plasma levels are significantly affected by health and lifestyle status in the elderly, with important decrease in sarcopenia [90] or associated with visceral adipose tissue [91], supporting the possibility to use IL-15 or the IL-15 super-agonist (ALT-803) to enhance NK cell function in a subpopulation of old patients.
However, administration of low doses of IL-2 used to enhance ADCC triggered by anti-TAA improves the anti-tumour response of these cytotoxic cells [92] and did not show relevant toxicity issues in phase1/2 clinical trials [93–95]. Other clinical trials have studied IL-12 also along with anti-TAAs, although they did not observe any improvement of NK cell activity [96, 97]. NKTR-214 (bempegaldesleukin) is a human recombinant IL-2 attached to polyethylene glycol at the region of IL-2 that contacts the CD25. After administration, it generates active cytokine species with limited binding to the IL-2Rα subunit, thereby activating CD8+ T cells and NK cells, without expanding the T regulatory cells [98]. Its administration to cancer patients (n = 4) in a first-in-human study is well-tolerated, shows evidence for activation of the immune response, and it is being combined with anti-checkpoint mAbs in ongoing clinical trials [99]. The use of IL-21 is also under evaluation in clinical trials, showing better results in combination with anti-TAA [100]. As described below, cytokines are also used in NK cell expansion protocols, which are critical for the success of therapy based on adoptive cell transfer [101].
Engineered antibodies
Bi-specific (BiKE), tri-specific (TRiKE), or tetra-specific killer engagers (TetraKE) are small engineered antibody molecules designed to create a bonding between the NK cell and the tumour cells. These engagers hold in one end of their structure an anti-CD16 antibody, which will bind CD16 to trigger NK cell cytotoxicity, and in the other end an antigen for the tumour cell. This connection between the effector and target cell will lead to enhanced cytotoxicity and cytokine production of NK cells. An example of BiKE is CD16xCD33 which enhances the NK activity against CD33+ HL60 AML cell line in vitro [102]. TRiKE and TetraKE use IL-15 molecule as nexus between the antibodies and exhibited more cytotoxicity and generation of inflammatory cytokines than their BiKE ancestor [103]. Combined therapy using BiKEs or TriKEs with checkpoint blockade has been proposed to maximize NK cell anti-tumour response [103].
In addition, because glycosylation of Fc fraction influences antibody effector function, glycoengineering has provided to be useful to generate modified antibodies for use in immunotherapy [104].
Blockade of NK cell immune checkpoints
In the last decade, much attention has been given to the blockade of immune checkpoints for enhancing NK cell function against cancerous cells. The activity of NK cells can be modulated by the blockade of different NK immune checkpoints pathways, that constitute a promising therapeutic tool in immunotherapy [105].
It is known that HLA I inhibitory receptors are important modulators of NK cell activity and therefore interesting targets in this new therapeutic strategy. Both, KIRs and NKG2A blockade are under study, alone and in combination with other antibodies such as anti-PD-1 or rituximab (anti-CD20), to enhance NK cell activity [106, 107]. Anti-KIR antibodies, IPH2101 (1-7F9) and its replacement IPH 2102 (lirilumab, BMS-986015) that includes a modification in the hinge region that increases its in vivo stability have been analysed in clinical trials for haematological and solid tumours [108]. The antibody 1-7F9 blocks KIR signalling, therefore promoting NK cell-mediated lysis of HLA-matched AML blasts in vitro and in a xenograft model of AML [109]. However, when IPH2101 was tested in a clinical trial (NCT01248455) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, negative results were obtained. The lack of effect of this antibody in vivo was probably due to antibody-induced hypo-responsiveness and contraction of the KIR2D+ NK cell subset [110] and it has been proposed that IPH2101 alters NK cell function by inhibiting NK cell education [111]. It has been demonstrated that the use of the humanized anti-NKG2A antibody (Monalizumab) enhances tumour immunity by boosting both NK and CD8+ T cell effector functions in mice and humans [107].
In patients with metastatic melanoma, Tim-3 signalling blockade with anti-Tim-3 antibodies resulted in NK cell function recovery [112]. This also was confirmed on a study conducted on lung adenocarcinoma patients, whose peripheral NK cells exhibited higher cytotoxicity and IFN-γ production after TIM-3 blockade [113].
A family of paired receptors that exert opposite functions after interaction with ligands of the Nectin/Nectin-like family has being considered of interest in novel NK cell-based immunotherapy approaches. Two of these ligands (CD112 and CD155) are frequently overexpressed on tumour cells. These receptors include DNAM-1, TIGIT, PVRIG and TACTILE. Whereas binding of DNAM-1 to CD155 or CD112 on target cells triggers NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, TIGIT interaction with these ligands inhibits NK cell function. PVRIG is also an inhibitory receptor that interacts with CD112 [24]. Furthermore, a significant increase in NK cell-mediated cytolytic activity against tumour cells has been demonstrated following antibody-mediated blockade of TIGIT [114]. Additionally, TIGIT blockade drives enhancement of NK cell killing of tumour cells triggered by trastuzumab [115]. Several clinical trials based on checkpoint blockade using mAbs against TIGIT are ongoing [23, 24]. COM701, an anti-PVRIG mAb, is being tested in a phase I clinical trial (NCT03667716) in patients with advanced solid tumours either as monotherapy or in combination with Nivolumab [24]. It has also been reported an increase in IFN-γ production by NK cells and an improvement in the tumour control in different mouse models with lung metastases when CD96 (TACTILE) was blocked [116].
Adoptive NK cell-based immunotherapy
Advances in the knowledge of NK cell biology and new methods of cell processing under good manufacturing practice (GMP) conditions allow the possibility of a more accurate clinical use of these cells. NK cells are a promising tool for use in adoptive immunotherapy against different types of cancer due to their innate ability to recognize and lyse tumour cells through the rapid activation of a series of NK activating receptors without the need for prior sensitization [73, 117].
Sources of NK cells and purification process
Adoptive immunotherapy based on NK cells requires a high number of cells for its application from 1 × 106 to 8 × 107 CD3− CD56+ NK cells per kilogram recipient body weight [118]. Therefore, as NK cells comprise a low percentage of cells (5–15% in peripheral blood), it is necessary to expand them before being used in adoptive immunotherapy. Autologous or allogeneic NK cells can be used for transfer and cells can be obtained from different sources: peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), umbilical cord blood (UCB), bone marrow (BM), induced pluripotent stem cells, (IPSs) and cell lines [119–125]. The expansion of large numbers of NK cells with high purity and viability are crucial factors for their use in therapy. Different protocols have been analysed for the expansion of clinical-grade NK cells observing GMP [126]. The expansion protocol can start from purified or enriched NK cells or NK cells expanded from apheresis products (e.g. PBMCs). Subsequently, NK cells are purified in the final stages of the process usually by magnetic separation to eliminate other immune cells such as T or B cells [127, 128]. This is crucial after an allogeneic HSCT where alloreactive T lymphocytes expanded from the donor can cause side effects to the patient such as GvHD [128–132].
Here we briefly review the protocols of expansion and ex vivo activation of NK cells from PBMCs. Safe and efficient production methods are essential to obtain a large number of functional NK cells ready for research and clinical application.
Induction of NK cell expansion by cytokines
The use of cytokines is a well-founded method to effectively expand NK cells and boost their activity, as they are known to mediate in their proliferation and activation. A wide array of cytokines such as IL-2, IL-15, IL-12, IL-18, IL-21 and type I IFNs are used for ex vivo expansion of NK cells [133–136]. IL-2 promotes survival, stimulates activation and improves cytotoxicity of NK cells in a relatively short time (24 h) after incubation. The stimulation of PBMCs with IL-2 results in the expansion of a population termed lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells that comprise a mixed population of NK and T cells with higher cytotoxic capacity against autologous tumour cells [137, 138]. However, the adoptive transfer of autologous NK cells combined with low doses of IL-2 in cancer patients was safe but did not provide clinical benefits [88, 139, 140].
The versatility of expansion protocols using cytokines has been demonstrated; peripheral blood purified NK cells incubated with IL-15 and hydrocortisone, for 20 days, expanded 23 times their initial number, while NK cells stimulated with IL-2 and IL-15 alone or combined for 84 days produced an expansion of 1000 times their initial number [132, 141]. IL-2 and IL-15 are closely related cytokines, when used in combination increases proliferation, viability and favours the priming of NK cells. Only IL-15, and not IL-2, can maintain the cytolytic functions after the infusion of NK cells [101, 128, 142]. In vitro culture of NK cells with IL-2 and IL-15 induces the expression of activating receptors NKG2D, NKp44, NKp30 and NKp46 [40, 141, 143–146]. We have also shown that ex vivo stimulation of NK cells from AML patients with IL-15 and IL-2 increased the expression of NKp30, NKG2D, and DNAM-1 receptors and improved their cytotoxicity against tumour cell lines [82]. IL-12, also used in expansion protocols, can stimulate the production of IFN-γ by NK cells [147]. The combination of IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 induces cytokine-induced memory-like (CIML) NK cells that are long-lived and highly cytotoxic cells with a high production of IFN-γ. CIML NK cells have been tested in adoptive immunotherapy in mouse tumour models and show promising effects against melanoma and lymphoma in vivo [148, 149].
NK cell expansion with accessory and feeder cells
Despite the activation and robustness of the cytotoxic response, the degree of expansion achieved by NK cells in culture with cytokines seems to be insufficient. The expansion of NK cells requires diverse survival, proliferation and activation signals. Thus, stimuli from accessory cells can be used to enhance the expansion of NK cells to obtain enough cells to be used in adoptive NK cell therapy [139, 150]. It has been described a better expansion of NK cells when the culture starts with the entire PBMCs fraction [151] than when purified NK cells are used, suggesting that other non-NK cells, included in the PBMCs fraction provide additional factors for the proliferation of NK cells. Co-culture of NK cells with autologous accessory non-NK cells or addition of growth-inactivated feeder cells are methodological strategies with pronounced effects on NK cell activation and expansion [152, 153].
Assays in healthy donors and patients with MM using the combination of IL-2 (500 U/ml) and anti-CD3 mAb has shown a wide range of NK cell expansions in PBMCs cultures from 190-fold in healthy donors [151] to 1600-fold in MM patients [154] after 20 days of culture. It should be noted that starting the culture from PBMCs leads to the expansion of unwanted CD3+ T and NKT-like (CD3+CD56+) cells. However, the infusion of this heterogeneous population, containing potentially alloreactive T cells, did not cause side effects such as GvHD in a clinical trial [155]. This is probably due to the loss of T cell-mediated alloreactivity during extended expansion periods [152, 156]. Thus, the risks in allogeneic transplantation have to be considered [129].
Irradiated PBMCs (monocytes and/or autologous or allogenic B-lymphoblastoid cells) have been used as feeder cells in co-cultures of purified NK cells with the addition of IL-2 (1000 U/ml) with good results, from 25-fold to 30-fold increase [157, 158]. A combination of feeder cells (irradiated), IL-2, anti-CD3 mAb and recombinant human fibronectin fragment (RetroNectin) induces a powerful expansion of up to 4720 fold after 21 days, with more than 90% of NK purity [159].
The possibility of using as feeder cells genetically modified cell lines, such as K562-mb15-41BBL that express IL-15 and 41BBL to activate NK cells, is currently being tested with extraordinary results and with relatively low IL-2 concentrations (100 U/ml) with expansions ranging from 152-fold at day 14 to 277-fold increase at day 21 [160, 161]. Besides, they proved their effectiveness by eliminating tumour cells in mouse models of AML and against autologous and allogeneic tumour cells in vitro [161, 162]. Finally, despite the remarkable results in NK cell expansion with genetically modified allogeneic cell lines, these methods of expansion with tumour cell lines require the generation of a Master Cell Bank and certification and approval of strict regulations according to GMP for their safe use in adoptive immunotherapy [161, 163].
CAR-NK cells
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) is an artificial receptor initially designed to enhance T cell activity towards cancerous cells. CAR receptor can bind a wide range of molecules including proteins, carbohydrates and glycolipids. Treatment with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells has been shown successful [164], thus, becoming the most used CAR. It recognizes CD19, an antigen expressed in B cell leukaemia and lymphoma, as well as in B cells. CAR-T cells have shown positive results in haematological cancers in clinical trials [165, 166]. Nevertheless, CAR-T therapy requires to be personalized with autologous blood cells due to the need of the restricted HLA matching, and therefore plausible side effects such as GvHD, neurotoxicity, cytokine release syndrome, etc. Unfortunately, this is an expensive and time-consuming process [167, 168].
On the other hand, the use of CAR-NK overcomes some of the CAR-T cells disadvantages. As NK cells are not HLA restricted, there is no risk of GvHD making possible the production not only of allogenic CAR-NK cell but also CAR-NK cell lines, which will reduce both the cost and time of the treatment. Thus, the NK-92 cell line is being used for the manufacture of CAR-NK cells, as it is a cell line that regenerates easily [125]. NK cells usually do not secrete the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1 and IL-6, which are involved in the initiation of the cytokine release syndrome [167, 169]. Moreover, CAR-NK cells can recognize other ligands different from the CAR receptor-ligand using their activating receptors NKp30, NKp44, NKp46, NKG2D or DNAM-1 [167]. For all these, CAR-NK cells emerge as a promising tool in immunotherapy against cancer.
Currently, CAR-NK cells are being tested in several clinical trials targeting different receptor in haematological and solid cancers, although they are still in early phases (NCT02944162, NCT03824964, NCT03690310, NCT03056339, NCT03692637, and NCT03692663).
Adoptive transfer of NK cells: results from clinical trials
The use of autologous NK cells in cancer immunotherapy was evaluated by Rosenberg et al. [88] when LAK cells were transferred to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and melanomas. Although transferred NK cells persisted for a long time, no significant clinical benefit was observed. Similar results were observed in a posterior clinical study using autologous in vitro activated NK cells (NCT00328861) for the treatment of 8 patients with metastatic solid tumours (7 patients with metastatic melanoma and 1 patient with renal cell carcinoma). The transferred NK cells persisted in the peripheral circulation of patients from 1 to several weeks after infusion [13]. The results of these studies suggest that treatment with autologous NK cells alone is not effective and the role of the KIR-HLA interaction inhibiting the activity of NK cells may be at least partially responsible for these results [13, 124]. The use of combined therapies may open new possibilities for the use of autologous NK cells. A phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02481934) has investigated the safety and efficacy of multiple infusions of activated and expanded autologous NK cells in combination with anti-myeloma drugs in MM patients. NK cells expanded with K562-mb15-41BBL cells were administered to five patients with recurrent or refractory MM. Patients also received four cycles of chemotherapy treatment with two infusions of 7.5 × 106 NK/kg per cycle. Two patients developed chemotherapy-related neutropenia. After NK cell treatment, four of five patients showed stabilization of the disease and two patients showed a reduction in bone marrow infiltration and a long-term response. These results support that ex vivo expansion of highly cytotoxic autologous NK cells is viable and that multiple infusions are well-tolerated [94].
The adoptive transfer of allogeneic NK cells may confer a superior anti-cancer effect than autologous NK cells, due to the possibility of selecting donor NK cells according to KIR-HLA mismatch [124]. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that allogeneic infusions of NK cells are safe and effective in different cancer settings including haematological malignancies and solid tumours [15]. However, there is still poor evidence on the role of adoptive transfer of NK cells to treat cancer and, unfortunately, only a few completed clinical trials have been published so far (Table 1).
Table 1.
Selected clinical trials with published results that use allogeneic NK cells to treat cancer patients
| Disease | Patients | Treatment | NK cell dosage | Outcome | Phase | Clinical Trial Identifier | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relapse AML | 10 children |
Conditioning regimen: Fludarabina, Cyclophosphamide Treatment: Haploidentical KIR-HLA-mismatched NK cell infusion + rhIL-2 |
Range: 5–81 × 106 NK cells/kg | Treatment with KIR-HLA-mismatched NK cells after low-dose immunosuppression is well-tolerated and successful engraftment was observed | 1 | NCT00187096 | Rubnitz et al. [95] |
| Relapse or refractory Leukaemia (ALL/AML) | 15 children not HCT & 14 children relapse after HCT |
Conditioning regimen: Clofarabine, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide Treatment: Haploidentical NK cell infusion + rhIL-2 |
Range: 3.5–103 × 106 NK cells/kg | 26 of 29 KIR-HLA-mismatched. NK cell infusions and IL-2 injections were well-tolerated. OS of patients without prior HCT was 0.36 and OS of patients with prior HCT was 0.25 | 1 | NCT00697671 | Rubnitz et al. [170] |
| High relapsing Multiple Myeloma | 8 |
Conditioning regimen: Bortezomib alone or Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone, Fludarabine, Bortezomib Treatment: Haploidentical or autologous NK cell infusion + rhIL-2 |
Up to 1 × 108 NK cells/kg | Infusion of large numbers of NK cells generated with K562-mb15-41BBL was feasible and safe. Superior expansion and activity of fresh compared to cryopreserved cells. Two patients did not require additional treatment for 6 months, one of them had a partial response and the other showed a decrease in disease progression. In 5 patients, disease progression was not affected by NK cell infusion | 2 |
(IND 14560) |
Szmania et al. [176] |
|
Myeloid malignancies (AML, MDS, CML) |
21 (2 children, 19 adults) |
Conditioning regimen: Fludarabine, Busulfan, Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, GCSF Treatment: Haploidentical NK cell infusion (KIR-HLA mismatch in phase 1) before allogeneic transplant |
Range: 0.02–8.32 × 106/kg |
Adoptive transfer of NK cells before allogeneic transplant is safe and feasible. No toxicity occurred with the maximal cell doses used and efficacy was related to the number of infused NK cells Complete remission was observed in 5 adult patients |
1–2 | Lee et al. [172] | |
| Poor prognosis refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) | 15 |
Conditioning regimen: Cyclophosphamide, Pentostatin, Denileukin Treatment: Haploidentical NK cell infusion + Rituximab + rhIL-2 |
Range: 0.5–3.27 × 107 NK cells/kg | Treatment was well-tolerated and induced remission of 25% of highly refractory NHL patients. A short-term persistence of haploidentical NK cells and 28% overall response rate was observed | 2 | NCT01181258 | Bachanova et al. [177] |
| Liver metastasis of gastrointestinal origin | 9 |
Conditioning regimen: Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide Treatment: Allogeneic NK cell infusion + rhIL-2 + Cetuximab |
3 × 106, 8 × 106 or 12 × 106 NK cells/kg | Combined therapy using allogeneic NK cells administered via intra-hepatic artery, cetuximab and a high dose IL-2 is feasible, well-tolerated and can induce clinical responses. FoxP3+ regulatory T cells and PD-1+ T cells expanded in all patients, related to IL-2 administration | 1 | NCT 02845999 | Adotevi et al. [178] |
| Advanced AML | 42 |
Conditioning regimen: Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide Treatment: Haploidentical NK cell infusion + rhIL-15 |
1.9 × 107/kg (those with rhIL-15 I.V) 1.2 × 107/kg (those with rhIL-15 S.C) |
NK-cell infusions in combination with rhIL-15 induced remission in 32% of patients (rhIL-15 I.V.) and 40% patients (rhIL-15 S.C.). Cytokine release syndrome was observed in 56% of patients given subcutaneous rhIL-15 | 1 | Cooley et al. [175] | |
| Intermediate-risk AML in first complete remission | 21 children |
Conditioning regimen: Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine Treatment: Haploidentical KIR–HLA-mismatched NK cells + rhIL-2 |
Range: 3.6–62.2 × 106 cells/kg | NK cell infusions are well-tolerated, and transient engraftment is observed. Adoptive transfer of NK cells did not improve event-free or overall survival rates in children with intermediate-risk AML | 2 | NCT00703820 | Nguyen et al. [171] |
Many clinical trials with published results are in phase 1 and include a limited number of patients that impede to obtain accurate conclusions on the effect of adoptive transfer of NK cells on patient outcome. Thus, several clinical trials were developed to determine the safety and feasibility of haploidentical NK cell infusions in children with leukaemia. In childhood AML and ALL (clinical trials NCT00187096 and NCT00187096), NK cell infusion was well-tolerated, without GvHD, and successful engraftment of NK cells was observed [95, 170]. In one cohort the 2-year event-free survival estimate was 100%, supporting the feasibility and efficacy of this regimen [95]. However, in a phase 2 study (NCT00703820) designed to assess the efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy with haploidentical and KIR-HLA-mismatched NK cells in children with intermediate-risk AML, no difference was observed in event-free or overall survival. The authors suggest that in future clinical trials, repeated infusions of NK cells either during earlier phases of treatment to control tumour burden or during maintenance therapy could provide ongoing immune surveillance [171].
The effect of infusion of haploidentical NK cells before allogeneic stem cell transplant was analysed in phase 1 (NCT00402558) and phase 2 (NCT01390402) clinical trials that enrolled 21 patients with high-risk AML, MDS, or CML. Haploidentical alloreactive NK cell infusion before HSCT was well-tolerated without interfering with engraftment or affecting the rate of GvHD. Five patients showed durable complete remissions [172].
The results from another phase I/II clinical trial (EudraCT Number: 2011-003181-32), that enrolled patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 40–70 years) with treatment-refractory, high-risk MDS, MDS/AML or de novo AML treated with infusions of haploidentical NK cells, also support that MDS and MDS/AML and de novo AML, are susceptible to NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy [173]. Additionally, the results from a recent clinical trial (NCT02763475) with AML patients under 30 years old, support that the incorporation of NK cells to standard chemotherapy directly reduces the likelihood of relapse in these patients [174]. Together, these studies reinforce the use of NK cell-based immunotherapy strategies as a possible treatment approach both for haematologic malignancies and solid tumours.
Two clinical trials demonstrated that intravenous (NCT01385423) or subcutaneous (NCT02395822) administration of rhIL-15 in combination with haploidentical NK cell infusion demonstrated high rates of in vivo expansion of adoptively transferred donor NK cells after lymphodepleting chemotherapy and peripheral blood NK cells were more cytotoxic against K562 cells compared with those patients who did not receive rhIL-15. Cytokine release syndrome was observed in 56% of patients given subcutaneous rhIL-15 but not was observed with intravenous administration. NK-cell infusions in combination with rhIL-15 induced remission in 32% of patients (rhIL-15 I.V.) and 40% patients (rhIL-15 S.C.) [175].
A phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01313897) analysed the safety, persistence and activity of NK cells expanded and activated in vitro with the K562-mb15-41BBL cell line in high-risk relapsing myeloma. Autologous (5 patients) or haploidentical (3 patients) NK cells were infused after a preparative regimen followed by the administration of IL-2. No serious adverse events related to NK cell infusion were observed. It has been demonstrated superior expansion and activity of fresh NK cell products compared to cryopreserved products. Among the 7 evaluable patients, one had a partial response and in another, a decrease of disease progression was observed and neither patient required further therapy for 6 months. However, in the 5 remaining patients, disease progression was not affected by NK cell transfer [176].
In poor prognosis refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) patients, treatment with haploidentical NK cell infusion together with Rituximab and rhIL-2 was well-tolerated and induced remission of 25% of highly refractory NHL patients (NCT01181258). A short-term persistence of haploidentical NK cells and 28% overall response rate was observed. It should be highlighted that NHL patients have a suppressive environment that is associated with inferior clinical responses after donor NK cell infusions [177].
Compared to haematological malignancies, adoptive transfer of allogeneic NK cell in solid tumours remains elusive. A phase 1 clinical trial using allogeneic NK cells, infused via intra-hepatic artery, combined with anti-EGFR (cetuximab) and high dose IL-2 has enrolled 9 patients with liver metastasis of colorectal or pancreatic cancers. Clinical responses were observed in 3 patients who received donor NK cells with at least one KIR-ligand mismatch. Although the results showed that the combination was feasible, well-tolerated and clinical responses were observed in one-third of the patients, a detrimental expansion of regulatory T cells and PD-1+ T cells related to administration of high dose IL-2 was observed in all patients [178].
Conclusions and perspectives
The development during the last decade of successful cancer immunotherapy strategies has represented a revolution in cancer treatment. The better understanding of the cellular and molecular interactions between the immune system and different types of tumour cells allows the rising number of approaches that are being actively exploited to manipulate cells of the immune system in novel cancer immunotherapy procedures. Since their discovery, NK cells have been proposed as effector cells in immunotherapy of solid tumours and haematological malignancies. NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy aims to selectively manipulate the mechanisms that regulate NK cell function to enhance NK cell cytotoxicity. Several strategies to trigger NK cell cytotoxicity by ADCC using either anti-TAA mAbs or engineered engagers, alone or in combinations with activating cytokines (IL-2 or IL-15) have been tested in clinical trials and proved to be safe and efficient. Besides, the technological advances to isolate, expand and activate NK cells ex vivo in GMP conditions, support the translation to clinics of NK-cell-based therapeutic approaches based on adoptive transfer of NK cells.
Considering the current knowledge on NK cell biology and that the immune system is frequently depressed in cancer patients and is affected by age or latent viral infections, we consider that a previous detailed analysis of NK cells and their activation and inhibitory receptors, should be required to define personalised NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy. This analysis will depend, not only on the immunotherapy protocol designed in each case (solid tumour vs. leukaemia, triggering host NK cells vs. adoptive therapy, etc.), but also on other aspects such as donors’ age and CMV serostatus that affect NK cell subsets and their function.
Abbreviations
- AML
Acute myeloid leukaemia
- ADCC
Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity
- Anti-TAA
Anti-tumour-associated antigens
- APCs
Antigen-presenting cells
- CAR
Chimeric antigen receptor
- CMV
Cytomegalovirus
- EGFR
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- GMP
Good manufacturing practice
- GvHD
Graft-versus-host disease
- HCMV
Human cytomegalovirus
- HLA
Human leukocyte antigen
- HSCT
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- KIR
Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors
- LAG-3
Lymphocyte-activating gene 3
- MHC
Major histocompatibility complex
- MCMV
Murine cytomegalovirus
- MM
Multiple myeloma
- NCRs
Natural cytotoxicity receptors
- NHL
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
- NK
Natural killer
- PD-1
Programmed death-1
- TAA
Tumour-associated antigen
- TIGIT
T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains
- TIM-3
T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3
Author contributions
RT, CA and RS designed the first draft of the manuscript. NL, BG, FH and IV contributed to the writing of different sections, figures and tables. AP, BS, NP and ED discussed the manuscript sections and contributed with updated references. All authors revised and agreed to the final version of the paper.
Funding
This work was supported by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (PI13/02691 to Rafael Solana and PI16/01615 to Rafael Solana and Corona Alonso). Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (SAF2013-46161-R and SAF2017-87538-R to Raquel Tarazona). Consejería de Economía e Infraestructuras, Junta de Extremadura (IB16164 and grants to INPATT (CTS040) research group GR18085 to Raquel Tarazona). Grants were cofinanced by European Regional Development Funds (FEDER) “Una manera de hacer Europa”. Grant TE-0039-18 (to Beatriz Guerrero) from Consejería de Educación y Empleo cofinanced by European Social Fund, Youth Employment Initiative, “El FSE invierte en tu futuro”. Plan Propio Universidad de Córdoba (to Alejandra Pera).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Raquel Tarazona, Email: rtarazon@unex.es.
Corona Alonso, Email: corona_alonso@hotmail.com.
Rafael Solana, Email: rsolana@uco.es.
References
- 1.Imai K, Matsuyama S, Miyake S, Suga K, Nakachi K. Natural cytotoxic activity of peripheral-blood lymphocytes and cancer incidence: an 11-year follow-up study of a general population. Lancet. 2000;356:1795–1799. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03231-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ottinger HD, Beelen DW, Scheulen B, Schaefer UW, Grosse-Wilde H. Improved immune reconstitution after allotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow. Blood. 1996;88:2775–2779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zaghi E, Calvi M, Di VC, Mavilio D. Innate immune responses in the outcome of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to cure hematologic malignancies. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2794. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ullah MA, Hill GR, Tey SK. Functional reconstitution of natural killer cells in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:144. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Minculescu L, Marquart HV, Friis LS, Petersen SL, Schiodt I, Ryder LP, Andersen NS, Sengeloev H. Early natural killer cell reconstitution predicts overall survival in T cell-replete allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:2187–2193. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruggeri L, Mancusi A, Capanni M, Urbani E, Carotti A, Aloisi T, Stern M, Pende D, Perruccio K, Burchielli E, Topini F, Bianchi E, Aversa F, Martelli MF, Velardi A. Donor natural killer cell allorecognition of missing self in haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: challenging its predictive value. Blood. 2007;110:433–440. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-038687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hsu KC, Keever-Taylor CA, Wilton A, Pinto C, Heller G, Arkun K, O’Reilly RJ, Horowitz MM, Dupont B. Improved outcome in HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia predicted by KIR and HLA genotypes. Blood. 2005;105:4878–4884. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tarazona R, Sanchez-Correa B, Casas-Aviles I, Campos C, Pera A, Morgado S, Lopez-Sejas N, Hassouneh F, Bergua JM, Arcos MJ, Banas H, Casado JG, Duran E, Labella F, Solana R. Immunosenescence: limitations of natural killer cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017;66:233–245. doi: 10.1007/s00262-016-1882-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sanchez-Correa B, Campos C, Pera A, Bergua JM, Arcos MJ, Banas H, Casado JG, Morgado S, Duran E, Solana R, Tarazona R. Natural killer cell immunosenescence in acute myeloid leukaemia patients: new targets for immunotherapeutic strategies? Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2016;65:453–463. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1720-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lichtenegger FS, Krupka C, Kohnke T, Subklewe M. Immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2015;52:207–214. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2015.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Servais S, Porcher R, Xhaard A, Robin M, Masson E, Larghero J, Ribaud P, Dhedin N, Abbes S, Sicre F, Socie G, de Peffault LR. Pre-transplant prognostic factors of long-term survival after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with matched related/unrelated donors. Haematologica. 2014;99:519–526. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.089979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rezvani AR, Storer BE, Guthrie KA, Schoch HG, Maloney DG, Sandmaier BM, Storb R. Impact of donor age on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parkhurst MR, Riley JP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive transfer of autologous natural killer cells leads to high levels of circulating natural killer cells but does not mediate tumor regression. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6287–6297. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Veluchamy JP, Kok N, van der Vlet HJ, Verheul HMW, de Gruijl TD, Spanholtz J. The rise of allogeneic natural killer cells as a platform for cancer immunotherapy: recent innovations and future developments. Front Immunol. 2017;8:631. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lupo KB, Matosevic S. Natural killer cells as allogeneic effectors in adoptive cancer immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019 doi: 10.3390/cancers11060769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Del Zotto G, Marcenaro E, Vacca P, Sivori S, Pende D, Della CM, Moretta F, Ingegnere T, Mingari MC, Moretta A, Moretta L. Markers and function of human NK cells in normal and pathological conditions. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2017;92:100–114. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Freud AG, Mundy-Bosse BL, Yu J, Caligiuri MA. The broad spectrum of human natural killer cell diversity. Immunity. 2017;47:820–833. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Horowitz A, Strauss-Albee DM, Leipold M, Kubo J, Nemat-Gorgani N, Dogan OC, Dekker CL, Mackey S, Maecker H, Swan GE, Davis MM, Norman PJ, Guethlein LA, Desai M, Parham P, Blish CA. Genetic and environmental determinants of human NK cell diversity revealed by mass cytometry. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:208ra145. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Di Vito C, Mikulak J, Mavilio D. On the way to become a natural killer cell. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1812. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Morgado S, Sanchez-Correa B, Casado JG, Duran E, Gayoso I, Labella F, Solana R, Tarazona R. NK cell recognition and killing of melanoma cells is controlled by multiple activating receptor-ligand interactions. J Innate Immun. 2011;3:365–373. doi: 10.1159/000328505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Paul S, Lal G. The molecular mechanism of natural killer cells function and its importance in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1124. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, Caligiuri MA, Zitvogel L, Lanier LL, Yokoyama WM, Ugolini S. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science. 2011;331:44–49. doi: 10.1126/science.1198687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanchez-Correa B, Lopez-Sejas N, Duran E, Labella F, Alonso C, Solana R, Tarazona R. Modulation of NK cells with checkpoint inhibitors in the context of cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019;68:861–870. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02336-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sanchez-Correa B, Valhondo I, Hassouneh F, Lopez-Sejas N, Pera A, Bergua JM, Arcos MJ, Banas H, Casas-Aviles I, Duran E, Alonso C, Solana R, Tarazona R. DNAM-1 and the TIGIT/PVRIG/TACTILE axis: novel immune checkpoints for natural killer cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019 doi: 10.3390/cancers11060877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anderson AC, Joller N, Kuchroo VK. Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: co-inhibitory receptors with specialized functions in immune regulation. Immunity. 2016;44:989–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Joller N, Kuchroo VK. Tim-3, Lag-3, and TIGIT. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;410:127–156. doi: 10.1007/82_2017_62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bauer S, Groh V, Wu J, Steinle A, Phillips JH, Lanier LL, Spies T. Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress-inducible MICA. Science. 1999;285:727–729. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5428.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sivori S, Vitale M, Morelli L, Sanseverino L, Augugliaro R, Bottino C, Moretta L, Moretta A. p46, a novel natural killer cell-specific surface molecule that mediates cell activation. J Exp Med. 1997;186:1129–1136. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.7.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pende D, Parolini S, Pessino A, Sivori S, Augugliaro R, Morelli L, Marcenaro E, Accame L, Malaspina A, Biassoni R, Bottino C, Moretta L, Moretta A. Identification and molecular characterization of NKp30, a novel triggering receptor involved in natural cytotoxicity mediated by human natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1505–1516. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.10.1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vitale M, Bottino C, Sivori S, Sanseverino L, Castriconi R, Marcenaro E, Augugliaro R, Moretta L, Moretta A. NKp44, a novel triggering surface molecule specifically expressed by activated natural killer cells, is involved in non-major histocompatibility complex-restricted tumor cell lysis. J Exp Med. 1998;187:2065–2072. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.12.2065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shibuya A, Campbell D, Hannum C, Yssel H, Franz-Bacon K, McClanahan T, Kitamura T, Nicholl J, Sutherland GR, Lanier LL, Phillips JH. DNAM-1, a novel adhesion molecule involved in the cytolytic function of T lymphocytes. Immunity. 1996;4:573–581. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)70060-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Casado JG, Pawelec G, Morgado S, Sanchez-Correa B, Delgado E, Gayoso I, Duran E, Solana R, Tarazona R. Expression of adhesion molecules and ligands for activating and costimulatory receptors involved in cell-mediated cytotoxicity in a large panel of human melanoma cell lines. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58:1517–1526. doi: 10.1007/s00262-009-0682-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sanchez-Correa B, Morgado S, Gayoso I, Bergua JM, Casado JG, Arcos MJ, Bengochea ML, Duran E, Solana R, Tarazona R. Human NK cells in acute myeloid leukaemia patients: analysis of NK cell-activating receptors and their ligands. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;60:1195–1205. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1050-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Solana R, Campos C, Pera A, Tarazona R. Shaping of NK cell subsets by aging. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014;29:56–61. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Campos C, Pera A, Sanchez-Correa B, Alonso C, Lopez-Fernandez I, Morgado S, Tarazona R, Solana R. Effect of age and CMV on NK cell subpopulations. Exp Gerontol. 2014;54:130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chidrawar SM, Khan N, Chan YL, Nayak L, Moss PA. Ageing is associated with a decline in peripheral blood CD56bright NK cells. Immun Ageing. 2006;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1742-4933-3-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fali T, Papagno L, Bayard C, Mouloud Y, Boddaert J, Sauce D, Appay V. New insights into lymphocyte differentiation and aging from telomere length and telomerase activity measurements. J Immunol. 2019;202:1962–1969. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lopez-Verges S, Milush JM, Schwartz BS, Pando MJ, Jarjoura J, York VA, Houchins JP, Miller S, Kang SM, Norris PJ, Nixon DF, Lanier LL. Expansion of a unique CD57(+)NKG2Chi natural killer cell subset during acute human cytomegalovirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:14725–14732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110900108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bjorkstrom NK, Riese P, Heuts F, Andersson S, Fauriat C, Ivarsson MA, Bjorklund AT, Flodstrom-Tullberg M, Michaelsson J, Rottenberg ME, Guzman CA, Ljunggren HG, Malmberg KJ. Expression patterns of NKG2A, KIR, and CD57 define a process of CD56dim NK cell differentiation uncoupled from NK cell education. Blood. 2010;116:3853–3864. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Campos C, Lopez N, Pera A, Gordillo JJ, Hassouneh F, Tarazona R, Solana R. Expression of NKp30, NKp46 and DNAM-1 activating receptors on resting and IL-2 activated NK cells from healthy donors according to CMV-serostatus and age. Biogerontology. 2015;16:671–683. doi: 10.1007/s10522-015-9581-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Foley B, Cooley S, Verneris MR, Pitt M, Curtsinger J, Luo X, Lopez-Verges S, Lanier LL, Weisdorf D, Miller JS. Cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic transplantation promotes a lasting increase in educated NKG2C+ natural killer cells with potent function. Blood. 2012;119:2665–2674. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-386995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Solana R, Tarazona R, Aiello AE, Akbar AN, Appay V, Beswick M, Bosch JA, Campos C, Cantisan S, Cicin-Sain L, Derhovanessian E, Ferrando-Martinez S, Frasca D, Fulop T, Govind S, Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Hill A, Hurme M, Kern F, Larbi A, Lopez-Botet M, Maier AB, McElhaney JE, Moss P, Naumova E, Nikolich-Zugich J, Pera A, Rector JL, Riddell N, Sanchez-Correa B, Sansoni P, Sauce D, van Rene L, Wang GC, Wills MR, Zielinski M, Pawelec G. CMV and immunosenescence: from basics to clinics. Immun Ageing. 2012;9:23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-386995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lopez-Sejas N, Campos C, Hassouneh F, Sanchez-Correa B, Tarazona R, Pera A, Solana R. Effect of CMV and aging on the differential expression of CD300a, CD161, T-bet, and Eomes on NK Cell subsets. Front Immunol. 2016;7:476. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hassouneh F, Lopez-Sejas N, Campos C, Sanchez-Correa B, Tarazona R, Solana R, Pera A. Differential effect of cytomegalovirus infection with age on the expression of CD57, CD300a, and CD161 on T-cell subpopulations. Front Immunol. 2017;8:649. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pera A, Vasudev A, Tan C, Kared H, Solana R, Larbi A. CMV induces expansion of highly polyfunctional CD4+ T cell subset coexpressing CD57 and CD154. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;101:555–566. doi: 10.1189/jlb.4A0316-112R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pera A, Campos C, Corona A, Sanchez-Correa B, Tarazona R, Larbi A, Solana R. CMV latent infection improves CD8+ T response to SEB due to expansion of polyfunctional CD57+ cells in young individuals. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e88538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lanier LL. NK cell recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:225–274. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chiossone L, Chaix J, Fuseri N, Roth C, Vivier E, Walzer T. Maturation of mouse NK cells is a 4-stage developmental program. Blood. 2009;113:5488–5496. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-187179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Loh J, Chu DT, O’Guin AK, Yokoyama WM, Virgin HW. Natural killer cells utilize both perforin and gamma interferon to regulate murine cytomegalovirus infection in the spleen and liver. J Virol. 2005;79:661–667. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.1.661-667.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fang M, Lanier LL, Sigal LJ. A role for NKG2D in NK cell-mediated resistance to poxvirus disease. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e30. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Beli E, Clinthorne JF, Duriancik DM, Hwang I, Kim S, Gardner EM. Natural killer cell function is altered during the primary response of aged mice to influenza infection. Mech Ageing Dev. 2011;132:503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fang M, Roscoe F, Sigal LJ. Age-dependent susceptibility to a viral disease due to decreased natural killer cell numbers and trafficking. J Exp Med. 2010;207:2369–2381. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nogusa S, Ritz BW, Kassim SH, Jennings SR, Gardner EM. Characterization of age-related changes in natural killer cells during primary influenza infection in mice. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129:223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Duan X, Lu J, Wang H, Liu X, Wang J, Zhou K, Jiang W, Wang Y, Fang M. Bidirectional factors impact the migration of NK cells to draining lymph node in aged mice during influenza virus infection. Exp Gerontol. 2017;96:127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Beli E, Duriancik DM, Clinthorne JF, Lee T, Kim S, Gardner EM. Natural killer cell development and maturation in aged mice. Mech Ageing Dev. 2014;135:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shehata HM, Hoebe K, Chougnet CA. The aged nonhematopoietic environment impairs natural killer cell maturation and function. Aging Cell. 2015;14:191–199. doi: 10.1111/acel.12303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chiu BC, Martin BE, Stolberg VR, Chensue SW. The host environment is responsible for aging-related functional NK cell deficiency. J Immunol. 2013;191:4688–4698. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nair S, Fang M, Sigal LJ. The natural killer cell dysfunction of aged mice is due to the bone marrow stroma and is not restored by IL-15/IL-15Ralpha treatment. Aging Cell. 2015;14:180–190. doi: 10.1111/acel.12291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Smith HR, Heusel JW, Mehta IK, Kim S, Dorner BG, Naidenko OV, Iizuka K, Furukawa H, Beckman DL, Pingel JT, Scalzo AA, Fremont DH, Yokoyama WM. Recognition of a virus-encoded ligand by a natural killer cell activation receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:8826–8831. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092258599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Arase H, Mocarski ES, Campbell AE, Hill AB, Lanier LL. Direct recognition of cytomegalovirus by activating and inhibitory NK cell receptors. Science. 2002;296:1323–1326. doi: 10.1126/science.1070884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Orr MT, Sun JC, Hesslein DG, Arase H, Phillips JH, Takai T, Lanier LL. Ly49H signaling through DAP10 is essential for optimal natural killer cell responses to mouse cytomegalovirus infection. J Exp Med. 2009;206:807–817. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sun JC, Madera S, Bezman NA, Beilke JN, Kaplan MH, Lanier LL. Proinflammatory cytokine signaling required for the generation of natural killer cell memory. J Exp Med. 2012;209:947–954. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Guma M, Budt M, Saez A, Brckalo T, Hengel H, Angulo A, Lopez-Botet M. Expansion of CD94/NKG2C+ NK cells in response to human cytomegalovirus-infected fibroblasts. Blood. 2006;107:3624–3631. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lopez-Botet M, Muntasell A, Vilches C. The CD94/NKG2C+ NK-cell subset on the edge of innate and adaptive immunity to human cytomegalovirus infection. Semin Immunol. 2014;26:145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Muntasell A, Vilches C, Angulo A, Lopez-Botet M. Adaptive reconfiguration of the human NK-cell compartment in response to cytomegalovirus: a different perspective of the host-pathogen interaction. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:1133–1141. doi: 10.1002/eji.201243117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bjorkstrom NK, Lindgren T, Stoltz M, Fauriat C, Braun M, Evander M, Michaelsson J, Malmberg KJ, Klingstrom J, Ahlm C, Ljunggren HG. Rapid expansion and long-term persistence of elevated NK cell numbers in humans infected with hantavirus. J Exp Med. 2011;208:13–21. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Petitdemange C, Becquart P, Wauquier N, Beziat V, Debre P, Leroy EM, Vieillard V. Unconventional repertoire profile is imprinted during acute chikungunya infection for natural killer cells polarization toward cytotoxicity. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002268. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hendricks DW, Balfour HH, Jr, Dunmire SK, Schmeling DO, Hogquist KA, Lanier LL. Cutting edge: NKG2C(hi)CD57+ NK cells respond specifically to acute infection with cytomegalovirus and not Epstein-Barr virus. J Immunol. 2014;192:4492–4496. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Merino A, Zhang B, Dougherty P, Luo X, Wang J, Blazar BR, Miller JS, Cichocki F. Chronic stimulation drives human NK cell dysfunction and epigenetic reprograming. J Clin Invest. 2019;130:3770–3785. doi: 10.1172/JCI125916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Paust S, Gill HS, Wang BZ, Flynn MP, Moseman EA, Senman B, Szczepanik M, Telenti A, Askenase PW, Compans RW, von Andrian UH. Critical role for the chemokine receptor CXCR6 in NK cell-mediated antigen-specific memory of haptens and viruses. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:1127–1135. doi: 10.1038/ni.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nikzad R, Angelo LS, Aviles-Padilla K, Le DT, Singh VK, Bimler L, Vukmanovic-Stejic M, Vendrame E, Ranganath T, Simpson L, Haigwood NL, Blish CA, Akbar AN, Paust S. Human natural killer cells mediate adaptive immunity to viral antigens. Sci Immunol. 2019;4:eaat8116. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aat8116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hydes T, Abuhilal M, Armstrong T, Primrose J, Takhar A, Khakoo S. Natural killer cell maturation markers in the human liver and expansion of an NKG2C+ KIR+ population. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 1):S45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60360-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sivori S, Meazza R, Quintarelli C, Carlomagno S, Della CM, Falco M, Moretta L, Locatelli F, Pende D. NK Cell-based immunotherapy for hematological malignancies. J Clin Med. 2019 doi: 10.3390/jcm8101702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Verheyden S, Bernier M, Demanet C. Identification of natural killer cell receptor phenotypes associated with leukemia. Leukemia. 2004;18:2002–2007. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhang Y, Wang B, Ye S, Liu S, Liu M, Shen C, Teng Y, Qi J. Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor gene polymorphisms in patients with leukemia: possible association with susceptibility to the disease. Leuk Res. 2010;34:55–58. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2009.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.He Y, Bunn PA, Zhou C, Chan D. KIR 2D (L1, L3, L4, S4) and KIR 3DL1 protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:82104–82111. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fauriat C, Just-Landi S, Mallet F, Arnoulet C, Sainty D, Olive D, Costello RT. Deficient expression of NCR in NK cells from acute myeloid leukemia: evolution during leukemia treatment and impact of leukemia cells in NCRdull phenotype induction. Blood. 2007;109:323–330. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-027979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Stringaris K, Sekine T, Khoder A, Alsuliman A, Razzaghi B, Sargeant R, Pavlu J, Brisley G, de Lavallade H, Sarvaria A, Marin D, Mielke S, Apperley JF, Shpall EJ, Barrett AJ, Rezvani K. Leukemia-induced phenotypic and functional defects in natural killer cells predict failure to achieve remission in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2014;99:836–847. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.087536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Pasero C, Gravis G, Granjeaud S, Guerin M, Thomassin-Piana J, Rocchi P, Salem N, Walz J, Moretta A, Olive D. Highly effective NK cells are associated with good prognosis in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6:14360–14373. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sun C, Xu J, Huang Q, Huang M, Wen H, Zhang C, Wang J, Song J, Zheng M, Sun H, Wei H, Xiao W, Sun R, Tian Z. High NKG2A expression contributes to NK cell exhaustion and predicts a poor prognosis of patients with liver cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1264562. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1264562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sanchez-Correa B, Gayoso I, Bergua JM, Casado JG, Morgado S, Solana R, Tarazona R. Decreased expression of DNAM-1 on NK cells from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Immunol Cell Biol. 2012;90:109–115. doi: 10.1038/icb.2011.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sanchez-Correa B, Bergua JM, Pera A, Campos C, Arcos MJ, Banas H, Duran E, Solana R, Tarazona R. In vitro culture with interleukin-15 leads to expression of activating receptors and recovery of natural killer cell function in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Front Immunol. 2017;8:931. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Almeida-Oliveira A, Smith-Carvalho M, Porto LC, Cardoso-Oliveira J, Ribeiro AS, Falcao RR, Abdelhay E, Bouzas LF, Thuler LC, Ornellas MH, Diamond HR. Age-related changes in natural killer cell receptors from childhood through old age. Hum Immunol. 2011;72:319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2011.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liu H, Wang S, Xin J, Wang J, Yao C, Zhang Z. Role of NKG2D and its ligands in cancer immunotherapy. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9:2064–2078. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kaifu T, Nakamura A. Polymorphisms of immunoglobulin receptors and the effects on clinical outcome in cancer immunotherapy and other immune diseases: a general review. Int Immunol. 2017;29:319–325. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxx041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tarazona R, Casado JG, Soto R, DelaRosa O, Peralbo E, Rioja L, Pena J, Solana R. Expression of NK-associated receptors on cytotoxic T cells from melanoma patients: a two-edged sword? Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004;53:911–924. doi: 10.1007/s00262-004-0507-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hofer E, Koehl U. Natural killer cell-based cancer immunotherapies: from immune evasion to promising targeted cellular therapies. Front Immunol. 2017;8:745. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rosenberg SA, Lotze MT, Muul LM, Leitman S, Chang AE, Ettinghausen SE, Matory YL, Skibber JM, Shiloni E, Vetto JT. Observations on the systemic administration of autologous lymphokine-activated killer cells and recombinant interleukin-2 to patients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1485–1492. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198512053132327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Pangrazzi L, Meryk A, Naismith E, Koziel R, Lair J, Krismer M, Trieb K, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. “Inflamm-aging” influences immune cell survival factors in human bone marrow. Eur J Immunol. 2017;47:481–492. doi: 10.1002/eji.201646570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Yalcin A, Silay K, Balik AR, Avcioglu G, Aydin AS. The relationship between plasma interleukin-15 levels and sarcopenia in outpatient older people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30:783–790. doi: 10.1007/s40520-017-0848-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Al-Attar A, Presnell SR, Clasey JL, Long DE, Walton RG, Sexton M, Starr ME, Kern PA, Peterson CA, Lutz CT. Human body composition and immunity: visceral adipose tissue produces IL-15 and muscle strength inversely correlates with NK cell function in elderly humans. Front Immunol. 2018;9:440. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Ochoa MC, Minute L, Rodriguez I, Garasa S, Perez-Ruiz E, Inoges S, Melero I, Berraondo P. Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity: immunotherapy strategies enhancing effector NK cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2017;95:347–355. doi: 10.1038/icb.2017.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gluck WL, Hurst D, Yuen A, Levine AM, Dayton MA, Gockerman JP, Lucas J, Denis-Mize K, Tong B, Navis D, Difrancesco A, Milan S, Wilson SE, Wolin M. Phase I studies of interleukin (IL)-2 and rituximab in B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: IL-2 mediated natural killer cell expansion correlations with clinical response. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2253–2264. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1087-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Leivas A, Perez-Martinez A, Blanchard MJ, Martin-Clavero E, Fernandez L, Lahuerta JJ, Martinez-Lopez J. Novel treatment strategy with autologous activated and expanded natural killer cells plus anti-myeloma drugs for multiple myeloma. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1250051. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1250051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Ribeiro RC, Pounds S, Rooney B, Bell T, Pui CH, Leung W. NKAML: a pilot study to determine the safety and feasibility of haploidentical natural killer cell transplantation in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:955–959. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ansell SM, Geyer SM, Maurer MJ, Kurtin PJ, Micallef IN, Stella P, Etzell P, Novak AJ, Erlichman C, Witzig TE. Randomized phase II study of interleukin-12 in combination with rituximab in previously treated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6056–6063. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Parihar R, Nadella P, Lewis A, Jensen R, De HC, Dierksheide JE, VanBuskirk AM, Magro CM, Young DC, Shapiro CL, Carson WE., III A phase I study of interleukin 12 with trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-overexpressing malignancies: analysis of sustained interferon gamma production in a subset of patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5027–5037. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Charych DH, Hoch U, Langowski JL, Lee SR, Addepalli MK, Kirk PB, Sheng D, Liu X, Sims PW, VanderVeen LA, Ali CF, Chang TK, Konakova M, Pena RL, Kanhere RS, Kirksey YM, Ji C, Wang Y, Huang J, Sweeney TD, Kantak SS, Doberstein SK. NKTR-214, an engineered cytokine with biased IL2 receptor binding, increased tumor exposure, and marked efficacy in mouse tumor models. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:680–690. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Bentebibel SE, Hurwitz ME, Bernatchez C, Haymaker C, Hudgens CW, Kluger HM, Tetzlaff MT, Tagliaferri MA, Zalevsky J, Hoch U, Fanton C, Aung S, Hwu P, Curti BD, Tannir NM, Sznol M, Diab A. A first-in-human study and biomarker analysis of NKTR-214, a novel IL2Rbetagamma-biased cytokine, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:711–721. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Croce M, Rigo V, Ferrini S. IL-21: a pleiotropic cytokine with potential applications in oncology. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:696578. doi: 10.1155/2015/696578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wu Y, Tian Z, Wei H. Developmental and functional control of natural killer cells by cytokines. Front Immunol. 2017;8:930. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gleason MK, Ross JA, Warlick ED, Lund TC, Verneris MR, Wiernik A, Spellman S, Haagenson MD, Lenvik AJ, Litzow MR, Epling-Burnette PK, Blazar BR, Weiner LM, Weisdorf DJ, Vallera DA, Miller JS. CD16xCD33 bispecific killer cell engager (BiKE) activates NK cells against primary MDS and MDSC CD33+ targets. Blood. 2014;123:3016–3026. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-533398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Davis ZB, Vallera DA, Miller JS, Felices M. Natural killer cells unleashed: checkpoint receptor blockade and BiKE/TriKE utilization in NK-mediated anti-tumor immunotherapy. Semin Immunol. 2017;31:64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Wang LX, Tong X, Li C, Giddens JP, Li T. Glycoengineering of antibodies for modulating functions. Annu Rev Biochem. 2019;88:433–459. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kim N, Kim HS. Targeting checkpoint receptors and molecules for therapeutic modulation of natural killer cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9(2041):2041. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Pesce S, Greppi M, Grossi F, Del ZG, Moretta L, Sivori S, Genova C, Marcenaro E. PD/1-PD-Ls checkpoint: insight on the potential role of NK cells. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1242. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Andre P, Denis C, Soulas C, Bourbon-Caillet C, Lopez J, Arnoux T, Blery M, Bonnafous C, Gauthier L, Morel A, Rossi B, Remark R, Breso V, Bonnet E, Habif G, Guia S, Lalanne AI, Hoffmann C, Lantz O, Fayette J, Boyer-Chammard A, Zerbib R, Dodion P, Ghadially H, Jure-Kunkel M, Morel Y, Herbst R, Narni-Mancinelli E, Cohen RB, Vivier E. Anti-NKG2A mAb is a checkpoint inhibitor that promotes anti-tumor immunity by unleashing both T and NK cells. Cell. 2018;175:1731–1743. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Vey N, Karlin L, Sadot-Lebouvier S, Broussais F, Berton-Rigaud D, Rey J, Charbonnier A, Marie D, Andre P, Paturel C, Zerbib R, Bennouna J, Salles G, Goncalves A. A phase 1 study of lirilumab (antibody against killer immunoglobulin-like receptor antibody KIR2D; IPH2102) in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Oncotarget. 2018;9:17675–17688. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Romagne F, Andre P, Spee P, Zahn S, Anfossi N, Gauthier L, Capanni M, Ruggeri L, Benson DM, Jr, Blaser BW, Della CM, Moretta A, Vivier E, Caligiuri MA, Velardi A, Wagtmann N. Preclinical characterization of 1-7F9, a novel human anti-KIR receptor therapeutic antibody that augments natural killer-mediated killing of tumor cells. Blood. 2009;114:2667–2677. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-206532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Carlsten M, Korde N, Kotecha R, Reger R, Bor S, Kazandjian D, Landgren O, Childs RW. Checkpoint Inhibition of KIR2D with the monoclonal antibody IPH2101 induces contraction and hyporesponsiveness of NK cells in patients with myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5211–5222. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Felices M, Miller JS. Targeting KIR blockade in multiple myeloma: trouble in checkpoint paradise? Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5161–5163. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.da Silva I, Gallois A, Jimenez-Baranda S, Khan S, Anderson AC, Kuchroo VK, Osman I, Bhardwaj N. Reversal of NK-cell exhaustion in advanced melanoma by Tim-3 blockade. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:410–422. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Xu L, Huang Y, Tan L, Yu W, Chen D, Lu C, He J, Wu G, Liu X, Zhang Y. Increased Tim-3 expression in peripheral NK cells predicts a poorer prognosis and Tim-3 blockade improves NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in human lung adenocarcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;29:635–641. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Stanietsky N, Simic H, Arapovic J, Toporik A, Levy O, Novik A, Levine Z, Beiman M, Dassa L, Achdout H, Stern-Ginossar N, Tsukerman P, Jonjic S, Mandelboim O. The interaction of TIGIT with PVR and PVRL2 inhibits human NK cell cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:17858–17863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903474106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Xu F, Sunderland A, Zhou Y, Schulick RD, Edil BH, Zhu Y. Blockade of CD112R and TIGIT signaling sensitizes human natural killer cell functions. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017;66:1367–1375. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-2031-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Suzuki H, Duncan GS, Takimoto H, Mak TW. Abnormal development of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes and peripheral natural killer cells in mice lacking the IL-2 receptor beta chain. J Exp Med. 1997;185:499–505. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.3.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Choucair K, Duff JR, Cassidy CS, Albrethsen MT, Kelso JD, Lenhard A, Staats H, Patel R, Brunicardi FC, Dworkin L, Nemunaitis J. Natural killer cells: a review of biology, therapeutic potential and challenges in treatment of solid tumors. Future Oncol. 2019;15:3053–3069. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.McKenna DH, Jr, Sumstad D, Bostrom N, Kadidlo DM, Fautsch S, McNearney S, Dewaard R, McGlave PB, Weisdorf DJ, Wagner JE, McCullough J, Miller JS. Good manufacturing practices production of natural killer cells for immunotherapy: a six-year single-institution experience. Transfusion. 2007;47:520–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01145.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Masuyama J, Murakami T, Iwamoto S, Fujita S. Ex vivo expansion of natural killer cells from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells co-stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Bachanova V, Burns LJ, McKenna DH, Curtsinger J, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Lindgren BR, Cooley S, Weisdorf D, Miller JS. Allogeneic natural killer cells for refractory lymphoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59:1739–1744. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0896-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Lapteva N, Durett AG, Sun J, Rollins LA, Huye LL, Fang J, Dandekar V, Mei Z, Jackson K, Vera J, Ando J, Ngo MC, Coustan-Smith E, Campana D, Szmania S, Garg T, Moreno-Bost A, Vanrhee F, Gee AP, Rooney CM. Large-scale ex vivo expansion and characterization of natural killer cells for clinical applications. Cytotherapy. 2012;14:1131–1143. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2012.700767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Cany J, Dolstra H, Shah N. Umbilical cord blood-derived cellular products for cancer immunotherapy. Cytotherapy. 2015;17:739–748. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Eguizabal C, Zenarruzabeitia O, Monge J, Santos S, Vesga MA, Maruri N, Arrieta A, Rinon M, Tamayo-Orbegozo E, Amo L, Larrucea S, Borrego F. Natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: pluripotent stem cells-derived NK cells as an immunotherapeutic perspective. Front Immunol. 2014;5:439. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Nayyar G, Chu Y, Cairo MS. Overcoming resistance to natural killer cell based immunotherapies for solid tumors. Front Oncol. 2019;9:51. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Suck G, Odendahl M, Nowakowska P, Seidl C, Wels WS, Klingemann HG, Tonn T. NK-92: an ‘off-the-shelf therapeutic’ for adoptive natural killer cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2016;65:485–492. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1761-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Koepsell SA, Miller JS, McKenna DH., Jr Natural killer cells: a review of manufacturing and clinical utility. Transfusion. 2013;53:404–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03724.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Dykes JH, Toporski J, Juliusson G, Bekassy AN, Lenhoff S, Lindmark A, Scheding S. Rapid and effective CD3 T-cell depletion with a magnetic cell sorting program to produce peripheral blood progenitor cell products for haploidentical transplantation in children and adults. Transfusion. 2007;47:2134–2142. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Koehl U, Brehm C, Huenecke S, Zimmermann SY, Kloess S, Bremm M, Ullrich E, Soerensen J, Quaiser A, Erben S, Wunram C, Gardlowski T, Auth E, Tonn T, Seidl C, Meyer-Monard S, Stern M, Passweg J, Klingebiel T, Bader P, Schwabe D, Esser R. Clinical grade purification and expansion of NK cell products for an optimized manufacturing protocol. Front Oncol. 2013;3:118. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Ferrara JL, Levine JE, Reddy P, Holler E. Graft-versus-host disease. Lancet. 2009;373:1550–1561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60237-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Chan YLT, Zuo J, Inman C, Croft W, Begum J, Croudace J, Kinsella F, Maggs L, Nagra S, Nunnick J, Abbotts B, Craddock C, Malladi R, Moss P. NK cells produce high levels of IL-10 early after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and suppress development of acute GVHD. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48:316–329. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Oyer JL, Igarashi RY, Kulikowski AR, Colosimo DA, Solh MM, Zakari A, Khaled YA, Altomare DA, Copik AJ. Generation of highly cytotoxic natural killer cells for treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia using a feeder-free, particle-based approach. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:632–639. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Lapteva N, Szmania SM, van Rhee F, Rooney CM. Clinical grade purification and expansion of natural killer cells. Crit Rev Oncog. 2014;19:121–132. doi: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.2014010931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Zwirner NW, Domaica CI. Cytokine regulation of natural killer cell effector functions. BioFactors. 2010;36:274–288. doi: 10.1002/biof.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Freund-Brown J, Chirino L, Kambayashi T. Strategies to enhance NK cell function for the treatment of tumors and infections. Crit Rev Immunol. 2018;38:105–130. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2018025248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Romee R, Leong JW, Fehniger TA. Utilizing cytokines to function-enable human NK cells for the immunotherapy of cancer. Scientifica (Cairo) 2014;2014:205796. doi: 10.1155/2014/205796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Swann JB, Hayakawa Y, Zerafa N, Sheehan KC, Scott B, Schreiber RD, Hertzog P, Smyth MJ. Type I IFN contributes to NK cell homeostasis, activation, and antitumor function. J Immunol. 2007;178:7540–7549. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Cho D, Campana D. Expansion and activation of natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy. Korean J Lab Med. 2009;29:89–96. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.2.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Grimm EA, Mazumder A, Zhang HZ, Rosenberg SA. Lymphokine-activated killer cell phenomenon. Lysis of natural killer-resistant fresh solid tumor cells by interleukin 2-activated autologous human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1982;155:1823–1841. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.6.1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Miller JS, Soignier Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, McNearney SA, Yun GH, Fautsch SK, McKenna D, Le C, DeFor TE, Burns LJ, Orchard PJ, Blazar BR, Wagner JE, Slungaard A, Weisdorf DJ, Okazaki IJ, McGlave PB. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood. 2005;105:3051–3057. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Burns LJ, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, Vesole DH, Repka TL, Blazar BR, Burger SR, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Keever-Taylor CA, Zhang MJ, Miller JS. IL-2-based immunotherapy after autologous transplantation for lymphoma and breast cancer induces immune activation and cytokine release: a phase I/II trial. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;32:177–186. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Iliopoulou EG, Kountourakis P, Karamouzis MV, Doufexis D, Ardavanis A, Baxevanis CN, Rigatos G, Papamichail M, Perez SA. A phase I trial of adoptive transfer of allogeneic natural killer cells in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59:1781–1789. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0904-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Mao Y, van Hoef V, Zhang X, Wennerberg E, Lorent J, Witt K, Masvidal L, Liang S, Murray S, Larsson O, Kiessling R, Lundqvist A. IL-15 activates mTOR and primes stress-activated gene expression leading to prolonged antitumor capacity of NK cells. Blood. 2016;128:1475–1489. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-02-698027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Pillet AH, Bugault F, Theze J, Chakrabarti LA, Rose T. A programmed switch from IL-15- to IL-2-dependent activation in human NK cells. J Immunol. 2009;182:6267–6277. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Skak K, Frederiksen KS, Lundsgaard D. Interleukin-21 activates human natural killer cells and modulates their surface receptor expression. Immunology. 2008;123:575–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02730.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Boyiadzis M, Memon S, Carson J, Allen K, Szczepanski MJ, Vance BA, Dean R, Bishop MR, Gress RE, Hakim FT. Up-regulation of NK cell activating receptors following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation under a lymphodepleting reduced intensity regimen is associated with elevated IL-15 levels. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:290–300. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.12.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.van Ostaijen-ten Dam MM, Prins HJ, Boerman GH, Vervat C, Pende D, Putter H, Lankester A, van Tol MJ, Zwaginga JJ, Schilham MW. Preparation of cytokine-activated nk cells for use in adoptive cell therapy in cancer patients: protocol optimization and therapeutic potential. J Immunother. 2016;39:90–100. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kobayashi M, Fitz L, Ryan M, Hewick RM, Clark SC, Chan S, Loudon R, Sherman F, Perussia B, Trinchieri G. Identification and purification of natural killer cell stimulatory factor (NKSF), a cytokine with multiple biologic effects on human lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1989;170:827–845. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.3.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ni J, Miller M, Stojanovic A, Garbi N, Cerwenka A. Sustained effector function of IL-12/15/18-preactivated NK cells against established tumors. J Exp Med. 2012;209:2351–2365. doi: 10.1084/jem.20120944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Ni J, Holsken O, Miller M, Hammer Q, Luetke-Eversloh M, Romagnani C, Cerwenka A. Adoptively transferred natural killer cells maintain long-term antitumor activity by epigenetic imprinting and CD4(+) T cell help. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1219009. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1219009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Ahn YO, Kim S, Kim TM, Song EY, Park MH, Heo DS. Irradiated and activated autologous PBMCs induce expansion of highly cytotoxic human NK cells in vitro. J Immunother. 2013;36:373–381. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3182a3430f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Carlens S, Gilljam M, Chambers BJ, Aschan J, Guven H, Ljunggren HG, Christensson B, Dilber MS. A new method for in vitro expansion of cytotoxic human CD3− CD56+ natural killer cells. Hum Immunol. 2001;62:1092–1098. doi: 10.1016/S0198-8859(01)00313-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Granzin M, Wagner J, Kohl U, Cerwenka A, Huppert V, Ullrich E. Shaping of natural killer cell antitumor activity by ex vivo cultivation. Front Immunol. 2017;8:458. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Bae DS, Lee JK. Development of NK cell expansion methods using feeder cells from human myelogenous leukemia cell line. Blood Res. 2014;49:154–161. doi: 10.5045/br.2014.49.3.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Alici E, Sutlu T, Bjorkstrand B, Gilljam M, Stellan B, Nahi H, Quezada HC, Gahrton G, Ljunggren HG, Dilber MS. Autologous antitumor activity by NK cells expanded from myeloma patients using GMP-compliant components. Blood. 2008;111:3155–3162. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-110312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Barkholt L, Alici E, Conrad R, Sutlu T, Gilljam M, Stellan B, Christensson B, Guven H, Bjorkstrom NK, Soderdahl G, Cederlund K, Kimby E, Aschan J, Ringden O, Ljunggren HG, Dilber MS. Safety analysis of ex vivo-expanded NK and NK-like T cells administered to cancer patients: a phase I clinical study. Immunotherapy. 2009;1:753–764. doi: 10.2217/imt.09.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Sutlu T, Alici E. Ex vivo expansion of natural killer cells: a question of function. Cytotherapy. 2011;13:767–768. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2011.563295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Miller JS, Oelkers S, Verfaillie C, McGlave P. Role of monocytes in the expansion of human activated natural killer cells. Blood. 1992;80:2221–2229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Perussia B, Ramoni C, Anegon I, Cuturi MC, Faust J, Trinchieri G. Preferential proliferation of natural killer cells among peripheral blood mononuclear cells cocultured with B lymphoblastoid cell lines. Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul. 1987;6:171–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Sakamoto N, Ishikawa T, Kokura S, Okayama T, Oka K, Ideno M, Sakai F, Kato A, Tanabe M, Enoki T, Mineno J, Naito Y, Itoh Y, Yoshikawa T. Phase I clinical trial of autologous NK cell therapy using novel expansion method in patients with advanced digestive cancer. J Transl Med. 2015;13:277. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0632-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Imai C, Iwamoto S, Campana D. Genetic modification of primary natural killer cells overcomes inhibitory signals and induces specific killing of leukemic cells. Blood. 2005;106:376–383. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Fujisaki H, Kakuda H, Shimasaki N, Imai C, Ma J, Lockey T, Eldridge P, Leung WH, Campana D. Expansion of highly cytotoxic human natural killer cells for cancer cell therapy. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4010–4017. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Voskens CJ, Watanabe R, Rollins S, Campana D, Hasumi K, Mann DL. Ex-vivo expanded human NK cells express activating receptors that mediate cytotoxicity of allogeneic and autologous cancer cell lines by direct recognition and antibody directed cellular cytotoxicity. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:134. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Caunday O, Bensoussan D, Decot V, Bordigoni P, Stoltz JF. Regulatory aspects of cellular therapy product in Europe: JACIE accreditation in a processing facility. Biomed Mater Eng. 2009;19:373–379. doi: 10.3233/BME-2009-0602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Sadelain M, Brentjens R, Riviere I. The basic principles of chimeric antigen receptor design. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:388–398. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Kohl U, Arsenieva S, Holzinger A, Abken H. CAR T cells in trials: recent achievements and challenges that remain in the production of modified T cells for clinical applications. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29:559–568. doi: 10.1089/hum.2017.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Kalos M, Levine BL, Porter DL, Katz S, Grupp SA, Bagg A, June CH. T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:95ra73. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Hu Y, Tian Z, Zhang C. Natural killer cell-based immunotherapy for cancer: advances and prospects. Engineering. 2019;5:106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Bonifant CL, Jackson HJ, Brentjens RJ, Curran KJ. Toxicity and management in CAR T-cell therapy. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2016;3:16011. doi: 10.1038/mto.2016.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Godel P, Subklewe M, Stemmler HJ, Schlosser HA, Schlaak M, Kochanek M, Boll B, von Bergwelt-Baildon MS. Cytokine release syndrome. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:56. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0343-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Kang G, Gan K, Hartford C, Triplett BM, Dallas M, Shook D, Gruber T, Pui CH, Leung W. Natural killer cell therapy in children with relapsed leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62:1468–1472. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Nguyen R, Wu H, Pounds S, Inaba H, Ribeiro RC, Cullins D, Rooney B, Bell T, Lacayo NJ, Heym K, Degar B, Schiff D, Janssen WE, Triplett B, Pui CH, Leung W, Rubnitz JE. A phase II clinical trial of adoptive transfer of haploidentical natural killer cells for consolidation therapy of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:81. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0564-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Lee DA, Denman CJ, Rondon G, Woodworth G, Chen J, Fisher T, Kaur I, Fernandez-Vina M, Cao K, Ciurea S, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE. Haploidentical natural killer cells infused before allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies: a phase I trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:1290–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Bjorklund AT, Carlsten M, Sohlberg E, Liu LL, Clancy T, Karimi M, Cooley S, Miller JS, Klimkowska M, Schaffer M, Watz E, Wikstrom K, Blomberg P, Wahlin BE, Palma M, Hansson L, Ljungman P, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Ljunggren HG, Malmberg KJ. Complete remission with reduction of high-risk clones following haploidentical NK-cell therapy against MDS and AML. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:1834–1844. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Munoz BM, Vela CM, Fuster Soler JL, Astigarraga I, Pascual MA, Vagace Valero JM, Tong HY, Valentin QJ, Fernandez CL, Escudero LA, Sisinni L, Blanquer M, Mirones AI, Gonzalez MB, Borobia AM, Perez-Martinez A. Study protocol for a phase II, multicentre, prospective, non-randomised clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of infusing allogeneic activated and expanded natural killer cells as consolidation therapy for paediatric acute myeloblastic leukaemia. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e029642. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Cooley S, He F, Bachanova V, Vercellotti GM, DeFor TE, Curtsinger JM, Robertson P, Grzywacz B, Conlon KC, Waldmann TA, McKenna DH, Blazar BR, Weisdorf DJ, Miller JS. First-in-human trial of rhIL-15 and haploidentical natural killer cell therapy for advanced acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2019;3:1970–1980. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018028332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Szmania S, Lapteva N, Garg T, Greenway A, Lingo J, Nair B, Stone K, Woods E, Khan J, Stivers J, Panozzo S, Campana D, Bellamy WT, Robbins M, Epstein J, Yaccoby S, Waheed S, Gee A, Cottler-Fox M, Rooney C, Barlogie B, van Rhee F. Ex vivo-expanded natural killer cells demonstrate robust proliferation in vivo in high-risk relapsed multiple myeloma patients. J Immunother. 2015;38:24–36. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Bachanova V, Sarhan D, DeFor TE, Cooley S, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Blazar BR, Curtsinger JM, Burns L, Weisdorf DJ, Miller JS. Haploidentical natural killer cells induce remissions in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients with low levels of immune-suppressor cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018;67:483–494. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-2100-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Adotevi O, Godet Y, Galaine J, Lakkis Z, Idirene I, Certoux JM, Jary M, Loyon R, Laheurte C, Kim S, Dormoy A, Pouthier F, Barisien C, Fein F, Tiberghien P, Pivot X, Valmary-Degano S, Ferrand C, Morel P, Delabrousse E, Borg C. In situ delivery of allogeneic natural killer cell (NK) combined with Cetuximab in liver metastases of gastrointestinal carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7:e1424673. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1424673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



