Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 3;68(9):1547–1559. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02383-z

Table 1.

Patients’ demography and characteristics

Arm 1 Arm 2 Arm 3
Enrolled (n = 69) 23 (33.3%) 22 (31.9%) 24 (34.8%)
Safety evaluable (n = 67) 22 (32.8%) 22 (32.8%) 23 (34.4%)
Efficacy evaluable (n = 60) 17 (28.3%) 21 (35.0%) 22 (36.7%)
Sexa
 Female 9 (40.9%) 14 (63.6%) 10 (43.5%)
 Male 13 (59.1%) 8 (36.4%) 13 (56.5%)
Patient with baseline LDH,U/la
 0 < LDH < 250 17 (77.3%) 20 (90.9%) 20 (87.0%)
 LDH > 250 5 (22.7%) 2 (9.1%) 3 (13.0%)
ECOGa
 0 19 (86.4%) 17 (77.3%) 20 (87.0%)
 1 3 (13.6%) 5 (22.7%) 3 (13.0%)
Stage of metastatic disease at baselinea
 IV M1a 5 (22.7%) 5 (22.7%) 6 (26.1%)
 IV M1b 9 (40.9%) 11 (50.0%) 5 (21.7%)
 IV M1c 8 (36.4%) 6 (27.3%) 12 (52.2%)
Prior systemic antineoplastica
 Chemotherapy 9 (40.9%) 11 (50.0%) 11 (47.8%)
 Radiotherapy 4 (18.2%) 2 (9.1%) 4 (17.4%)

aPercent based on safety evaluable population