Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 8;65(8):941–949. doi: 10.1007/s00262-016-1854-1

Table 4.

Survival outcomes stratified by post-HDIL-2 treatment with VEGFR-TKI or mTORi and response to HDIL-2: 2-month landmark analysis

Best response and survival outcomes from HDIL-2 Median OS (months) HR (95 % CI) p value*
No VEGFR-TKI or mTORi post-HDIL-2, n = 204 24.9
Objective response to HDIL-2
 Yes versus No 103.7 versus 19.5 0.18 (0.10–0.30) <0.0001
Clinical benefit to HDIL-2
 Yes versus No 38.4 versus 12.2 0.27 (0.19–0.40) <0.0001
Best response to HDIL-2
 CR versus PR 156.7 versus 34.2 0.17 (0.06–0.45) 0.0004
 CR versus SD 156.7 versus 24.1 0.13 (0.05–0.28) <0.0001
 CR versus PD/NE 156.7 versus 12.2 0.06 (0.02–0.13) <0.0001
 PR versus SD 34.2 versus 24.1 0.76 (0.36–1.44) 0.43
 PR versus PD/NE 34.2 versus 12.2 0.35 (0.17–0.66) 0.0008
 SD versus PD/NE 24.1 versus 12.2 0.46 (0.31–0.69) 0.0001
VEGFR-TKI or mTORi post-HDIL-2, n = 81 53.1
Objective response to HDIL-2
 Yes versus No 83.5 versus 50.0 0.44 (0.20–0.90) 0.0235
Clinical benefit to HDIL-2
 Yes versus No 57.4 versus 27.2 0.29 (0.15–0.55) 0.0003
Best response to HDIL-2
 CR versus PR NR versus 83.5 0.56 (0.03–3.07) 0.55
 CR versus SD NR versus 57.4 0.36 (0.02–1.75 0.24
 CR versus PD/NE NR versus 27.2 0.12 (0.01–0.62) 0.0073
 PR versus SD 83.5 versus 57.4 0.64 (0.26–1.41) 0.27
 PR versus PD/NE 83.5 versus 27.2 0.21 (0.08–0.51) 0.0004
 SD versus PD/NE 57.4 versus 27.2 0.33 (0.17–0.65) 0.0016

VEGFR-TKI vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor, mTORi mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, and NR not reached

* Log-rank