Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 16;62(3):529–539. doi: 10.1007/s00262-012-1360-z

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for overall survival from enrollment

Univariate Multivariate
HR 95 % CI p HR 95 % CI p
Proliferating CD8+ T cells (%), high/low 2.86 1.26–6.50 0.012 2.58 1.01–6.61 0.049
Effector CD8+ T cells (%), high/low 1.69 0.83–3.42 0.146
Treg (%), high/low 3.81 1.69–8.57 0.001 2.40 0.94–6.17 0.069
Proliferating Treg (%), high/low 0.73 0.36–1.48 0.377
Gender, male/female 0.48 0.18–1.25 0.132 0.70 0.18–2.65 0.594
Age (years), above/below median 1.22 0.60–2.47 0.586 0.84 0.38–1.89 0.662
ECOG status (0, 1 or 2–3) 2 .24 1.14–4.43 0.020 1.69 0.76–3.78 0.200
WBC (x109/L), high/low 2.09 1.02–4.29 0.045 2.41 0.92–6.32 0.075
Hemoglobin (g/L), high/low 0.7 0.35–1.40 0.309 0.62 0.26–1.48 0.284
Platelets (x109/L), high/low 1.04 0.51–2.11 0.912 0.73 0.31–1.69 0.457
Diagnosis, MM/NSCLC 0.85 0.41–1.78 0.673 1.55 0.63–3.85 0.344

All categorical covariates were transformed into numeric codes before entering into the model. Immunological variables were divided into high and low at the point demonstrating the strongest association with survival in univariate analysis (data-driven dichotomization) or the median if no significant association was found. Only those significant in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. Clinical variables were dichotomized at the median

Bold values denote significant associations (p < 0.05)

CI confidence interval, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, HR hazard ratio, WBC white blood cell count